Accjc gone wild


Accreditation Agency Sanctions 2013



Download 2.61 Mb.
Page15/121
Date13.06.2017
Size2.61 Mb.
#20740
1   ...   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   ...   121

Accreditation Agency Sanctions 2013





Accreditation Results 2013



















 

Granted

Probation

Warning

Show

Removal

Total

sanctioned

 

 

 

 

Cause

 

 

 

Middle States

119

3

5

 

 

127

6.3%

New England

26

 

 

 

 

26

0.0%

North Central

14

2

 

 

 

16

12.5%

Northwest

35

 

2

 

 

37

5.4%

Southern

97

4

20

 

1

122

20.5%

ACCJC

24

5

13

1

1

44

45.5%

Total

315

14

40

1

2

372

15.3%

Percent ACCJC

7.6%

35.7%

32.5%

100.0%

50.0%

 

 


The above numbers were derived from reports listed on the various websites of the accreditation agencies. As in the past, ACCJC exceeded other agencies by a wide margin in the number of sanctions levied. In short, ACCJC continues to be out of control.

January 2014 Common Deficiencies





Common Deficiencies Leading to Sanctions










For the 16 colleges on sanction as of January 2014










Source: ACCJC News, Spring 2014













Colleges on Sanction

Program Review

Planning Using Assessment Results

Internal Governance

Board Rules and Responsibilities

Financial Management of Stability

Student Learning Outcomes Implementation

Employee Evaluation

16

6

14

5

6

8

12

10

Percent

37.5%

87.5%

31.3%

37.5%

50.0%

75.0%

62.5%





























Download 2.61 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   ...   121



The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message
    Main page
evaluation team
academic senate