Chapter 19
Renewing the Sectional Struggle
The Popular Sovereignty Panacea
The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the Mexican-American War, but it started a whole new debate about the extension of slavery, with Northerners rallying around the Wilmot Proviso (which proposed that the Mexican Cession lands be free soil); however, the Southerners shot it down.
Before, the two national parties, the Democrats and the Whigs, had had strong support from all over the nation; now, that was in jeopardy.
In 1848, Polk, due to tremendous overworking and chronic diarrhea, did not seek a second term, and the Democrats nominated General Lewis Cass, a veteran of the War of 1812, a senator and diplomat of wide experience and considerable ability, and the originator of popular sovereignty, the idea that issues should be decided upon by the people (specifically, it applied to slavery, stating that the people in the territories should decide to legalize it or not).
It was good (and liked by politicians) because it was a compromise between the extremes of the North and the South, and it stuck with the idea of self-determination, but it could spread slavery.
Political Triumphs for General Taylor
The Whigs nominated General Zachary Taylor, the hero of Buena Vista in the Mexican War, a man with no political experience, but a popular man, and they avoided all picky issues in his campaign.
Disgusted antislavery Northerners organized the Free Soil Party, a party committed against the extension of slavery in the territories and one that also advocated federal aid for internal improvements and urged free government homesteads for settlers.
This party appealed to people angry over the half-acquisition of Oregon, people who didn’t like Blacks in the new territory, as well as “conscience Whigs” who condemned slavery on moral grounds.
The Free-Soilers nominated Martin Van Buren.
Neither major party talked about the slavery issue, but Taylor won narrowly.
“Californy Gold”
In 1848, gold was discovered in California, and thousands flooded into the state, thus blowing the lid off off the slavery issue.
Most people didn’t “strike it rich,” but there were many lawless men and women.
As a result, California (privately encouraged by the president) drafted a constitution and then applied for free statehood, thus bypassing the usual territorial stage and avoiding becoming a slave state.
Sectional Balance and the Underground Railroad.
In 1850, the South was very well off, with a Southerner as president (Taylor), a majority in the cabinet and on the Supreme Court, and equality in the Senate meaning that its 15 states could block any proposed amendment that would outlaw slavery. Still, the South was worried.
The balance of 15 free states and 15 slave states was in danger with the admission of free California (which would indeed destroy the equilibrium forever) and other states might follow California as free states.
The South was also agitated about Texas’ claims on disputed territory and the prospect of no slavery in Washington D.C., thus putting a piece of non-slavery land right in the middle of slave-holding Virginia and Maryland.
Finally the Underground Railroad, a secret organization that took runaway states north to Canada, was taking more and more slaves from the South.
Harriet Tubman freed more than 300 slaves during 19 trips to the South.
The South was also demanded a stricter fugitive slave law.
Twilight of the Senatorial Giants
In 1850, the South was confronted with catastrophe, with California demanding admission as a free state.
Thus, the three giants met together for the last time to engineer a compromise.
Henry Clay, AKA “The Great Compromiser,” now 73 years old, urged concession from both the North and the South (the North for a fugitive slave law, the South for others) and was seconded by Stephen Douglas, the “Little Giant” and fine senator.
Southern spokesman John C. Calhoun, dying of tuberculosis, pleaded for states’ rights, for slavery to be left alone, for the return of runaway slaves, the restoration of the rights of the South as a minority, and the return for political balance.
Northerner Daniel Webster proclaimed that the new land could not hold slaves anyway, since it couldn’t cultivate cotton, etc… and his Seventh of March speech helped move the North into compromise.
As a result of the popular speech, though, Webster was also proclaimed a traitor to the North, since he had called for ignoring the slavery subject.
Deadlock and Danger on Capitol Hill
A new group of politicians, the “Young Guard,” seemed more interested in purifying the Union rather than patching it up.
William H. Seward, a young senator from New York, was flatly against concession and hated slavery, but he didn’t seem to realize that the Union was built on compromise, and he said that Christian legislators must adhere to a “higher law” and not allow slavery to exist; this might have cost him the 1860 presidential election.
President Taylor also appeared to have fallen under the influence of the “higher law,” vetoing every compromise sent to him by Congress.
Breaking the Congressional Logjam
Then, in 1850, Zachary Taylor suddenly died of an acute intestinal disorder, and portly Millard Fillmore took over the reigns.
Impressed by arguments of conciliation, he signed a series of agreements that came to be known as the Compromise of 1850.
Clay, Webster, and Douglas orated on behalf of the compromise for the North, but the South hated it; fortunately, they finally accepted it after much debate.
Balancing the Compromise Scales
What the North got… (the North got the better deal in the Compromise of 1850)
California was admitted as a free state, permanently tipping the balance.
Texas lost its disputed territory to New Mexico and (now) Oklahoma.
The District of Columbia could not have slave trade, but slavery was still legal. This was symbolic only. It was symbolic in that the nation’s capital “took a stance” against the trade. However, it was impractical because the trade only was illegal, not slavery and because a person could easily buy a slave in next-door Virginia.
What the South got…
Popular sovereignty in the Mexican Cession lands. This was good for the South because prior to this, there was to be no new slave lands (the 3630’ Missouri Compromise line had drawn that). On paper, this opened a lot of land to slavery, possibly. This was bad for the South because those lands were too dry to raise cotton anyway and therefore would never see slaves.
Texas was paid $10 million for the land lost to New Mexico.
A new, tougher Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 was drastic, and it stated that (1) fleeing slaves couldn’t testify on their own behalf, (2) the federal commissioner who handled the case got $5 if the slave was free and $10 if not, and (3) people who were ordered to help catch slaves had to do so, even if they didn’t want to.
Angry Northerners pledged not to follow the new law, and the Underground Railroad stepped up its timetable.
It turns out that the new Fugitive Slave Law was a blunder on behalf of the South, since it inflamed both sides, but a civil war didn’t occur, and this was better for the North, since with each moment, it was growing ahead of the South in population and wealth—in crops, factories, foundries, ships, and railroads.
Defeat and Doom for the Whigs
In 1852, the Democrats, unable to agree, finally nominated dark horse Franklin Pierce, a man who was unknown and enemyless.
The Whigs nominated “Old Fuss and Feathers,” Winfield Scott, the old veteran of the War of 1812 and the Mexican-American War.
Both parties boasted about the Compromise of 1850, though the Democrats did more.
The Whigs were hopelessly split, and thus, Pierce won in a landslide; the death of the Whigs ended the national political arguments and gave rise to sectional political alignments.
President Pierce the Expansionist
Pierce tried to be another Polk, and he impressed followers by reciting his inaugural address from memory, but his cabinet was filled with Southerners like Jefferson Davis and he was prepared to be a Southerners’ tool.
In July of 1856, a brazen American adventurer, William Walker, grabbed control in Nicaragua and proclaimed himself president, then legalized slavery, but a coalition of Latin American states overthrew him. This threw some fuel on the “Slavocracy” theory (a conspiracy theory where the South was always seeking new slave land).
Over on the Pacific, America was ready to open up Asia, and it opened up Japan when Commodore Matthew C. Perry steamed into the harbor of Tokyo in 1854 and asked/coerced/forced them to open up.
Coveted Cuba: Pearl of the Antilles
America wanted Cuba, but Spain wouldn’t sell it to the U.S. at any price, so after two bad attempts to take Cuba failed and after Spain captured the American steamer Black Warrior on a technicality, three U.S. foreign ministers met in Ostend, Belgium and drew up the Ostend Manifesto which stated that the U.S. was to offer $120 million to Spain for Cuba, and if it refused and Spain’s ownership of Cuba continued to endanger the U.S., then America would be justified in seizing the island.
Northerners were outraged once this “secret” document was leaked, and the South could not get Cuba (and obtain another slave state). More fuel thrown on the Slavocracy theory.
Also, since the North wanted Canada and the South did not, the North failed in obtaining Canada (sectional interests cancelled each other out).
Pacific Railroad Promoters and the Gadsden Purchase
Though the U.S. owned California and Oregon, getting out there was very difficult, since the sea routes were too long and the wagon route overland was dangerous, so the only real feasible solution lay in a transcontinental railroad.
The Southerners wanted a route through the South, but the best one would go through Mexico, so Secretary of War Jefferson Davis arranged to have James Gadsden appointed minister to Mexico.
Two reasons this was the best route: (1) the land was organized meaning any Indian attacks could be repelled by the U.S. Army and (2) geography—the plan was to skirt south of the Rocky Mtns.
Finding Santa Anna in power again, he bought the Gadsden Purchase for $10 million, and despite clamor about the “rip-off,” Congress passed the sale.
The South now appeared to have control of the location of the transcontinental railroad, but the North said that if the organization of territories was the problem, then Nebraska should be organized.
Douglas’s Kansas-Nebraska Scheme
To do this, Senator Stephen Douglas proposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which would let slavery in Kansas and Nebraska be decided upon by popular sovereignty (a concession to the South in return for giving up the railroad).
The problem was that the Missouri Compromise had banned any slavery north of the 3630’ line, so the act would have to repeal it.
Southerners had never thought of Kansas as a possible slave state, and thus backed the bill, but Northerners rallied against it.
Nevertheless, Douglass rammed the bill through Congress, and it was passed, repealing the Missouri Compromise.
Congress Legislates a Civil War
The Kansas-Nebraska Act directly wrecked the Missouri Compromise of 1820 (by opening slavery up above the 3630’ line) and indirectly wrecked the Compromise of 1850 (when everyone thought the issue was settled and done).
Northerners no longer enforced the Fugitive Slave Law at all, and Southerners were still angry.
The Democratic Party was hopelessly split into two, and after 1856, it would not have a president elected for 28 years.
Chapter 19 Vocabulary
Lewis Cass – Cass was named father of "popular sovereignty." He ran for president in 1848, but Gen. Taylor won. The north was against Cass because popular sovereignty made it possible for slavery to spread.
Stephen Douglas -- Stephen Douglas took over for Henry Clay in the Compromise of 1850. Clay could not get the compromise passed because neither party wanted to pass it as a whole since they would be passing things for the opposite party as well as their own. Douglas split the compromise up to get it passed. He later drew up the Kansas-Nebraska Act.
Franklin Pierce -- Franklin Pierce was elected president in the 1852 election as the second Democratic "dark horse." He was a pro-southern northerner who supported the Compromise of 1850 and especially the Fugitive Slave Law. He also tried to gain Cuba for the South as a slave state, but was stopped because of Northern public opinion after the incident in Ostend, Belgium. He also supported the dangerous Kansas-Nebraska Act pushed for by Senator Douglas. He was succeeded in 1856 by James Buchanan.
Zachary Taylor -- Taylor was a general and hero of the Mexican-American War. He was elected to the presidency in 1848, representing the Whig party. He was a good soldier but a poor administrator. He was in office during the crisis of California's admittance to the Union but died in office before a compromise could be worked out, and left Vice President Filmore to finalize a deal between the hostile north and south.
John C. Calhoun – Calhoun was a sixty-eight year old South Carolina senator when he died in 1850 of tuberculosis. The tension between the North and South had begun to build and become unbearable. An associate delivered a speech that he wrote which declared slavery okay. He proposed to leave slavery as it was and return runaway slaves to their owners. He wanted to preserve the Union and he believed in the Constitution.
Winfield Scott -- He was the old general-figure that the Whigs used to symbolize them. Scott, however, did not win the election of 1852. His personality did not fit with the masses which cost him the election. Pierce won the election of 1852.
Matthew C. Perry -- He was the naval leader who convinced the Japanese to sign a treaty in 1853 with the U.S. The treaty allowed for a commercial foothold in Japan which was helpful with furthering a relationship with Japan.
Henry Clay – Clay should have been nominated by the Whigs in the 1848 election because he was the ideal Whig. However, he’d made too many speeches which created too many enemies. He also came up with the Compromise of 1850.
Free-Soil Party -- The Free-Soil Party was organized by anti-slavery men in the north, Democrats who were resentful of Polk's actions, and some conscientious Whigs. The Free-Soil Party was against slavery in the new territories. They also advocated federal aid for internal improvements and urged free government homesteads for settlers. This Free-Soil Party foreshadowed the emergence of the Republican Party.
Fugitive Slave Law -- This law was passed just before the Civil War and also called the "Bloodhound Bill.” Slaves who escaped could not testify in their behalf and were not allowed a trial by jury. If the judge in the case freed the slave, the judge would receive five dollars, if not he would get ten dollars. Officers were expected to help catch runaway slaves. Those found helping slaves would be fined or jailed. This added to the rage in the North.
Underground Railroad – The railroad was a secret chain of anti-slavery homes at which slaves were hidden and taken to the north.
Harriet Tubman – Tubman was the “conductor” on the Underground Railroad. She repeatedly snuck down South to lead groups of slaves northward.
Compromise of 1850 -- This compromise signed, by Millard Fillmore, dealt with the controversy of whether California should join as a free state. The results were that California joined as a free state, and what was left of the Mexican Cession land became New Mexico and Utah, and did not restrict slavery. The South got the Mexican Cession lands opened to popular sovereignty and a tougher Fugitive Slave Law. The compromise benefited the North more than the South.
Ostend Manifesto -- The Ostend Manifesto took place in 1854. A group of Southerners met with Spanish officials in Belgium to attempt to get more slave territory. They felt this would balance out Congress. They tried to buy Cuba but the Spanish would not sell it. Southerners wanted to take it by force and the Northerners were outraged by this thought of the Slavocracy expanding. The scheme fell apart when the plan went public.
Kansas-Nebraska Act -- The Kansas-Nebraska Act, set forth in 1854, said that Kansas and Nebraska should come into the Union under popular sovereignty. This new law repealed the Missouri Compromise. Senator Stephen A. Douglas introduced it, and it pushed the country even closer the Civil War by muddling the slavery issue.
Chapter 20
Drifting Toward Disunion
Stowe and Helper: Literary Incendiaries
In 1852, Harriet Beecher Stowe published Uncle Tom’s Cabin, a popular book that awakened the passions of the North toward the evils of slavery.
In one line, it’s about the splitting up of a slave family and the cruel mistreatment of likeable Uncle Tom by a cruel slave master.
The book sold millions of copies, and overseas, British people were charmed by it.
The South cried foul saying Stowe’s portrayal of slavery was wrong and unfair.
The book helped Britain stay out of the Civil War because its people, who had read the book and had now denounced slavery because they sympathized with Uncle Tom, wouldn’t allow intervention on behalf of the South.
Another book, The Impending Crisis of the South, written by Hinton R. Helper, a non-aristocratic white North Carolinian who tried to prove, by an array of statistics, that the non-slave-holding Southern whites were really the ones most hurt by slavery.
Published in the North, this book and Uncle Tom’s Cabin were both banned in the South, but widely read in the North. They drove the North—South wedge deeper.
The North-South Contest for Kansas
Northerners began to pour into Kansas, and Southerners were outraged, since they had supported the Compromise of 1850 under the impression that Kansas would become a slave state.
Thus, on election day in 1855, hordes of Southerners “border ruffians” from Missouri flooded the polls and elected Kansas to be a slave state; free-soilers were unable to stomach this and set up their own government in Topeka.
Thus, confused Kansans had to chose between two governments: one illegal (free government in Topeka) and the other fraudulent (slavery government in Shawnee).
In 1856, a group of pro-slavery raiders shot up and burnt part of Lawrence, thus starting violence.
Kansas in Convulsion
John Brown, a crazy man (literally), led a band of followers to Pottawatomie Creek in May of 1856 and hacked to death five presumable pro-slaveryites.
This brutal violence surprised even the most ardent abolitionists and brought swift retaliation from pro-slaveryites. “Bleeding Kansas” was earning its name.
By 1857, Kansas had enough people to apply for statehood, and those for slavery devised the Lecompton Constitution, which provided that the people were only allowed to vote for the constitution “with slavery” or “without slavery.”
However, even if the constitution was passed “without slavery,” those slaveholders already in the state would still be protected. So, slaves would be in Kansas, despite the vote.
Angry free-soilers boycotted the polls and Kansas approved the constitution with slavery.
In Washington, James Buchanan had succeeded Franklin Pierce, but like the former president, Buchanan was more towards the South, and firmly supported the Lecompton Constitution.
Senator Stephen Douglas, refusing to have this fraudulent vote by saying this wasn’t true popular sovereignty, threw away his Southern support and called for a fair re-vote.
Thus, the Democratic Party was hopelessly divided, ending the last remaining national party for years to come (the Whigs were dead and the Republicans were a sectional party).
“Bully” Brooks and His Bludgeon
“Bleeding Kansas” was an issue that spilled into Congress: Senator Charles Sumner was a vocal anti-slaveryite, and his blistering speeches condemned all slavery supporters.
Congressman Preston S. Brooks decided that since Sumner was no gentleman he couldn’t challenge him to a duel, so Brooks beat the Sumner with a cane like a dog, which is just what he did until his cane broke; nearby Senators did nothing but watched, and Brooks was cheered on by the South.
However, the incident touched off fireworks, as Sumner’s “The Crime Against Kansas” speech was reprinted by the thousands, and it put Brooks and the South in the wrong.
“Old Buck” versus “The Pathfinder”
In 1856, the Democrats chose James Buchanan, someone untainted by the Kansas-Nebraska Act and a person with lots of political experience, to be their nomination for presidency against Republican John C. Fremont, a fighter in the Mexican-American War.
Another party, the American Party, also called the “Know-Nothing Party” because of its secrecy, was organized by “nativists,” old-stock Protestants against immigrants, who nominated Millard Fillmore.
These people were anti-Catholic and anti-foreign and also included old Whigs.
The campaign was full of mudslinging, which included allegations of scandal and conspiracy.
Fremont was hurt by the rumor that he was a Roman-Catholic.
The Electoral Fruits of 1856
Buchanan won because there were doubts about Fremont’s honesty, capacity, and sound judgment.
Perhaps it was better that Buchanan won, since Fremont was not as strong as Lincoln, and in 1856, many people were still apathetic about slavery, and the South could have seceded more easily.
The Dred Scott Bombshell
On March 6, 1857, the Dred Scott decision was handed down by the Supreme Court.
Dred Scott was a slave whose master took him north into free states where he lived for many years. After his master’s death, he sued for his freedom from his new master, claiming that he had been in free territory and was therefore free. The Missouri Supreme Court agreed, freeing him, but his new master appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which overruled the decision.
Outcomes or decisions of the case…
Share with your friends: |