Annex 1 to the Interim Report


Potential for long-range transport



Download 172.3 Kb.
Page8/9
Date18.10.2016
Size172.3 Kb.
#2518
TypeReport
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9

Potential for long-range transport


The vapour pressure of -endosulfan is 1.9 x 10-3 Pa, of -endosulfan 9.2 x 10-5 Pa (1). The value of Henry's Law Constant indicates a potential for volatilisation from moist surfaces, being 1.1 Pa x m3 x mol-1 for -endosulfan and 0.2 Pa x m3 x mol-1 for -endosulfan (2). Studies on leaf surfaces and soil also show a high loss rate to the atmosphere, and a higher loss of - than of -endosulfan (2). The half-life in air has been calculated to 8.5-27 days (2). Endosulfan has been detected in samples of Arctic air (1,2) and Arctic sea water (1). Reported mean concentrations in Arctic air are 3.0-8.3 pg/m3 (1). From this information, the criterion for long-range transport is considered to be met.
In European rivers, the - and -isomers as well as the breakdown product endosulfan sulfate been detected (1). The concentrations are low but considering the high toxicity to aquatic organisms they are not negligible. In addition, the presence in river water points to a route of transport from the areas of use to, e.g., sea water.
Endosulfan is included in The list of priority substances in the field of water policy, established under Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (3). In the context of the Water Framework Directive, the following mean concentrations have been reported for European surface waters (4):

-isomer:

0.017 µg/l

(191 samples from 27 stations; 93 above determination limit)

-isomer:

0.0088 µg/l

(180 samples from 25 stations; 82 above determination limit)

endosulfan sulfate:

0.0094 µg/l

(246 samples from 37 stations; 126 above determination limit)

For the sediment phase, the following mean concentrations were reported (4):



-isomer:

37.8 µg/kg

(75 samples from 20 stations; 45 above determination limit)



Consequences


The reported reduction of European consumption, mainly achieved in northern countries (see above), points to a possibility to reduce the usage also globally without too severe impacts on agriculture, horticulture and forestry. However, it is most likely that countries suffering from a higher insect pest pressure would encounter significantly larger difficulties. In comparison with potential chemical substitutes for endosulfan, it is important to consider also that target organisms are less likely to develop resistance against endosulfan, and also that endosulfan show lower toxicity to beneficial insects than some of the alternatives (1).
Within the work under the OSPAR Convention, endosulfan has been included in the List of Chemicals for Priority Action under the OSPAR Strategy with regard to Hazardous Substances, with the ultimate aim to achieve concentrations in the marine environment close to zero.

References

  1. Final Draft OSPAR Background Document on Hazardous Substances Identified for Priority Action - Endosulphan - Presented by Germany. OSPAR 02/7/9-E. To Meeting of the OSPAR Commission, Amsterdam, 24-28 June 2002. OSPAR Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic.

  2. - European Commission Peer Review Programme. Draft assessment report prepared in the context of the possible inclusion of the following active substance in Annex I of Council Directive 91/414/EEC: Endosulfan. Volumes 1 and 3, December 1999. Addendum to Volume 3, May 2001, October 2001 and January 2002, respectively. Rapporteur Member State: Spain.
    - European Commission Co-Operation. Concise outline Reports of ECCO meetings 102, 103 and 105, 2001: Endosulfan.

  3. Decision No 2455/2001/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2001 establishing the list of priority substances in the field of water policy and amending directive 2000/60/EC. Official Journal of the European Communities L331/1, 15.12.2001.

  4. Fraunhofer-Institut (1999) Revised Proposal for a List of Priority Substances in the Context of the Water Framework Directive (COMMPS Procedure). Draft Final Report. Declaration ref.: 98/788/3040/DEB/E1. Schmallenberg, Fraunhofer Institut Umweltchemie und Ökotoxikologie.

  5. Svenska Naturvårdsverket. Redovisning från nationell miljöövervakning 2002. Endosulfan. C Esbjörnson, examensarbete vid Karolinska Institutet.


Methoxychlor

1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)ethane

CAS No. 72-43-5
Metoxychlor has been used as a pesticide (insecticide), as a biocide and as a veterinary product. There are some structural similarities to DDT. Based on information in the draft OSPAR background document on methoxychlor, produced by Finland (3), there is no current production or use of metoxychlor in the OSPAR countries (note that the situation in Spain is unclear because of missing information, and that there are some EU-countries which are not contracting parties to the OSPAR convention). The production of methoxychlor in the USA was in the beginning of 1990 about 150 to 300 tonnes. The substance has been used in 19 different products in Sweden but since 1991 it is not allowed as a pesticide anymore.
Persistence

The degradation of methoxychlor is slow during aerobic conditions but much faster during anaerobic conditions. The half-life has been measured to < 30 days for anaerobic degradation in sediment and > 100 days during aerobic degradation in sediment. This degradation pattern is the same in soil. The half-life has been measured to 46 days, which indicate that methoxychlor is less persistent than DDT. The degradation products of methoxychlor are suspected to be endocrine disruptors (7). It is unclear if methoxychlor meets the criterion for persistency.



Bioaccumulation

Log Kow is 4.7 – 5.1. Bioconcentration factors (BCFs) in three different fish species are (1): 113-264 (sheepshead minnow), 1 500 (western mosquito fish, test duration only 72 hours), and 8 300 (fathead minnow, flow-through system). Methoxychlor seems to meet the criterion for bioaccumulation.



Toxicity


Methoxychlor is extremely toxic to aquatic organisms. The acute toxicity (LC50) for fish is 52 µg/l and 67 µg/l for rainbow trout and bluegill sunfish, respectively. The acute toxicity (LC50) for daphnids is as low as 0.8 µg/l. Methoxychlor is an endocrine disrupting chemical (2). The criterion for adverse effects is considered to be met.
Potential for long-range transport

Methoxychlor has a low vapour pressure (1.9 x 10-4 Pa) but Henry's Law Constant is 1.6 Pa x m3 x mol-1 which indicates a potential for volatilisation. The half-life in air is reported to be only 4 to 6.8 hours, which does not meet the criterion for long-range transport. However, methoxychlor has been detected in rain and snow from remote areas in Canada, which indicate that methoxychlor may be persistent in the atmosphere and undergo long-range transport. (4)





Download 172.3 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page