Associations of shrimp with gobies are widespread across the tropics. Most of the work on these goby-shrimp relationships has been done in the Red Sea/Indian Ocean Luther 1958; Magnus 1967; Karplus 1981



Download 0.76 Mb.
Page5/5
Date31.03.2018
Size0.76 Mb.
#43974
1   2   3   4   5



Table 4. Results from two-way ANOVA of numerical density of gobies (all sizes combined) for exclosure treatment and time.






Small Gobies

Medium Gobies

Large Gobies




ID#

Treatment

No. per plot (mean and S.D. of 18 plots)

Total count (18 plots)

No. per plot (mean and S.D. of 18 plots)

Total count (18 plots)

No. per plot (mean and S.D. of 18 plots)

Total count (18 plots)

Total of All Sizes combined (mean and S.D.)

0

None

6.28 + 1.41

113

7.56 + 0.98

136

4.11 + 1.02

70

17.94 + 1.55


































Small




Med




Large




Total

2

Full

7.11 + 1.68

128

13.28 + 2.14

239

4.06 + 1.11

73

24.44 + 2.38

2

Part

12.06 + 1.70

199

9.17 + 1.69

181

1.94 + 1.11

31

23.17 + 2.64

2

None

11.06 + 1.47

217

10.06 + 1.86

165

1.72 + 1.13

35

22.83 + 2.01


































Small




Med




Large




Total

3

Full

6.17 + 1.38

111

14.06 + 1.89

253

4.33 + 0.97

78

24.56 + 3.20

3

Part

11.61 + 1.97

215

10.06 + 2.24

185

2.50 + 1.29

37

24.17 + 3.00

3

None

11.94 + 1.26

209

10.28 + 1.96

181

2.06 + 1.00

45

24.28 + 2.37


































Small




Med




Large




Total

4

Full

5.50 + 1.58

99

13.94 + 1.47

251

3.72 + 1.07

67

23.17 + 2.83

4

Part

9.83 + 1.94

182

10.88 + 2.14

198

2.33 + 0.91

38

23.06 + 2.65

4

None

10.11 + 1.67

177

11.00 + 2.03

196

2.11 + 0.83

42

23.22 + 2.73


































Small




Med




Large




Total

5

Full

6.28 + 1.32

113

11.56 + 1.38

208

4.06 + 0.94

73

21.89 + 2.30

5

Part

8.17 + 1.42

151

11.00 + 1.94

202

2.33 + 0.97

35

21.56 + 2.30

5

None

8.39 + 1.50

147

11.22 + 2.16

198

1.94 + 0.87

42

21.56 + 2.94


































Small




Med




Large




Total

6

Full

7.44+ 1.76

134

11.56 + 1.38

208

3.06 + 0.87

55

22.06 + 2.67

6

Part

8.50 + 1.92

148

9.72 + 1.84

201

2.61 + 0.98

43

20.83 + 3.20

6

None

8.22 + 1.44

153

11.17 + 2.07

175

2.39 + 0.92

47

21.78 + 2.65


































Small




Med




Large




Total

7

Full

8.22 + 1.83

148

10.22 + 1.80

184

2.72 + 1.02

49

21.17 + 2.23

7

Part

8.50 + 1.89

147

9.22 + 1.59

181

2.39 + 1.04

49

20.11 + 2.87

7

None

8.17 + 1.65

153

10.06 + 2.01

166

2.72 + 0.89

43

20.94 + 2.35


Table 5. Mean numerical densities of gobies per plot, divided into three size classes, for each of seven data collection dates and three exclosure treatments (full, partial, none). (For ID#s, refer to Table 1.)


Source

df

SS

MS

F

P

Treatment

2

175.44

87.72

76.61

< 0.001

Month

5

12.22

2.04

1.78

0.102

Interaction

12

48.89

4.07

3.56

< 0.001

Error

357

408.78

1.15







Total

377

645.33











Table 6. Results from two-way ANOVA of numerical density of large gobies for exclosure treatment and time.
Appendix A. Mean number (+ S.D.) of large, medium and small gobies (separately) recorded per plot for each of three treatments from February to October 2004. Exclosures were in place and functional just after ID#0 and were taken down immediately after ID#5.





Download 0.76 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page