Base Engineering Assessment Program Stormwater Systems



Download 336.97 Kb.
Page5/8
Date05.05.2018
Size336.97 Kb.
#47801
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8

Compliance Assessment

  1. Stormwater Pipes and Pits


  1. Compliance is assessed against the following standards and guidelines:

  • Engineering Development Standards prepared by the local government in which the base is located

  • AS3500.3 Stormwater Drainage

  • Standard Clauses on Civil Engineering for Inclusion in Functional Design Briefs, Department of Defence (http://www.defence.gov.au/im/policy/technical/standard_inclusions/civil_feb06.doc

  1. The capacity and compliance of piped drainage systems are intrinsically linked. Pipes and pits are considered non-compliant if they cannot adequately convey the 1 in 10 year ARI.

  2. Pits should also be assessed for compliance with AS3500 requirements regarding safety and access. AS3500 notes minimum pit cover sizes and minimum internal dimension for man access into the pit for cleaning and maintenance. The cover, internal dimensions and the arrangement of step irons should be assessed as part of the investigations.
  1. Flood Immunity

    1. Description


  1. The pit and pipe stormwater network is required to accommodate a 1 in 10 year ARI storm event. Overland flow paths (which usually consist of roads, car parks and open channels) are designed to appropriately convey overland flows in excess of this event. The 100 year ARI storm event is an accepted design limit for overland flow paths (and is used by the local authority in this instance and the governing criteria).
    1. Data Collection


  1. The stormwater system data collection questionnaire (Appendix E) includes specific questions relating to the stormwater network. Data collection forms (Appendix D) also include prompts for specific data requirements that are needed to undertake the assessment.

  2. Data require for the flood immunity assessments includes site surface levels, layout plans for the site, details of any detention basins, ponds, weirs etc., previous hydraulic modelling studies and any flood hazard studies. Projections of future sea level rises will be required for coastal bases.

  3. The extent of available data should be confirmed during Phase One to establish what studies have already been undertaken, what data is available and where data gaps exist.

  4. Discussions with base staff will provide some indication of recent flood events.

  5. Accurate ground level data is required for flood modelling. The availability of LiDAR data for each site should be verified during Phase One, as historical survey information may be sufficient to complete the assessment.
    1. Capacity Assessment


  1. Where recent flood studies have been undertaken, these will be reviewed and used as a basis for assigning a capacity grade.

  2. If previous studies are limited, do not exist, or do not address the relevant design criteria, then hydraulic modelling will be undertaken using an appropriate software package for the 10, 50 and 100 year ARI design storm events. The analysis will identify areas of localised ponding and flood inundation.
    1. Condition Assessment


  1. Condition assessments will be undertaken on flow paths within stormwater catchments and will assess whether barriers or obstructions to stormwater flow exist. A serviceability grading will be assigned to each major flow path or catchment. This will be undertaken at a high level as the response will typically involve maintenance activities such as vegetation clearing, which is relatively low cost.




  1. The condition assessment criteria are shown in Table 1.1.

              1. Serviceability condition for flow paths

Serviceability - Vegetation

1

3

5



Vegetation has no effect on open conduit

Remediation expected to be required within 3 months

Overgrown, appears choked with weedy vegetation, waterway affected by thick plants and shrubs within channel – Remediation required


Serviceability - Debris

1

3

5



No significant debris in flow path

The extent of debris/ barriers may have limited impact on overland flow



Debris or barriers exists within the flow path which will significantly impact on run-off - remediation required


    1. Compliance Assessment


  1. The Defence Clauses for Function Design Briefs (Design Brief) provide a benchmark for the capacity and compliance of the stormwater system. An extract is included in Table 1.1.

  2. Compliance is assessed by undertaking hydraulic modelling for the 10, 50 and 100 year ARI events.

              1. Defence Clauses for Function Design Briefs

Location

Criteria

Operational Buildings

Floor level 0.3m above the 100 year ARI flood level.

Other buildings

Floor level 0.2m above the 50 year ARI flood level.

Main access road

Depth of flooding during a 50 year storm should be less than 0.1m.

Other roads, car parks, etc.

Depth of flooding during 10 year ARI storm should not exceed 0.1m for roads and 0.03m for car parks.

  1. Flood Hazard Classes, as outlined in Table 1.2 (Melbourne Water) should also be used to evaluate flood hazard within the study area. A risk class of moderate (2) or above is indicative of the point at which operations by able bodied adults would become impeded. This is also the approximate threshold at which normal passenger cars begin to float.

              1. Melbourne water hazard classes and criteria

Hazard Class

Hazard Criteria

Grade

Low

Depth * Velocity < 0.2 m/s2 and Depth < 0.2 m

1

Low-Moderate

Depth * Velocity < 0.4 or Depth < 0.4 m

2

Moderate

Depth * Velocity < 0.6or Depth < 0.6 m

3

Moderate-High

Depth * Velocity < 0.84 or Depth < 0.84 m

4

High

Depth * Velocity > 0.84 or Depth > 0.84 m

5



  1. Download 336.97 Kb.

    Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page