Base Engineering Assessment Program Stormwater Systems


Water Quality Description



Download 336.97 Kb.
Page6/8
Date05.05.2018
Size336.97 Kb.
#47801
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8

Water Quality

  1. Description


  1. Stormwater can be a major source of contaminants into water courses including nutrients, heavy metals and pathogens. Over recent years local governments have required the installation of water quality improvement devices in new developments. These typically include:

  • Trash racks

  • Gross pollutant traps (GPTs)

  • Constructed (artificial) wetlands

  • Gully Pit Baskets and Nets.

  1. The water quality assessment should be based on the requirements of:

  • State Government environmental protection policies

  • Engineering Development Standards prepared by the local government in which the base is located

  • Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) Principles

  • Standard Clauses on Civil Engineering for Inclusion in Functional Design Briefs, Department of Defence (http://www.defence.gov.au/im/policy/technical/standard_inclusions/civil_feb06.doc)

  • Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act

  • ANZECC: Australia and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council, Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality, October 2000.
    1. Data Collection


  1. The stormwater system data collection questionnaire (Appendix E) includes specific questions relating to the stormwater network. Data collection forms (Appendix D) also include prompts for specific data requirements that are needed to undertake the assessment.

  2. Data required for water quality assessments includes details of any water quality improvement devices including type, flow, function, age, by-pass facilities, manufacturer, model, dimensions, design capacities, maintenance practices. Other data will include water quality management plans, reports/ studies into stormwater quality and receiving waters, monitoring results, maintenance records
    1. Capacity Assessment


  1. The capacity will assessment will include:

    • Assessing the performance of existing water quality improvement devices based on any monitoring data

    • Comparing actual loading against the design or rated capacity.

  1. The capacity assessment is only relevant to installed water quality treatment devices. If no devices are installed (i.e. direct outflow), then the capacity assessment is not relevant.
    1. Condition Assessment


  1. Water quality improvement devices are graded on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 representing ‘As new’ condition and 5 representing an ‘unserviceable’ condition as outlined in Error: Reference source not foundTable 1.1 (structural) and Table 1.2 (serviceability).

              1. Structural condition - water quality improvement devices

Asset

Grade

Description

Gross Pollution Trap (GPT)

1

As new

2

Good - Minor erosion/hairline cracks but no effect on structure

3

Fair - Significant erosion, small amounts of concrete loose or missing, or cracks less than 5 mm – minor repair required, but structural integrity not compromised

4

Poor - Severe erosion/significant amounts of concrete loose or missing, or cracks between 5 and 15 mm– requires replacement or major repair, but not immediately

5

Very poor - Structure unsafe, major amounts of concrete loose or missing, or cracks greater than 15 mm – requires replacement as soon as possible

Trash racks/ Gully Pit Baskets

1

As new

2

Good - Minor wear but no effect on cover structure.

3

Fair - Significant erosion/wear or slight deformity – minor repair required, but structural integrity not compromised. Presents no appreciable health and safety risk.

4

Poor - Severe wearing/corrosion or major deformity, or poses minor health and safety risk – requires replacement or major repair

5

Very poor - Cover missing, requires major repair/replacement as soon as possible due to structural integrity loss or significant health and safety risk

Artificial Wetlands

1

As new

2

Good - Minor erosion/ no effect on structure

3

Fair - Significant erosion, small amounts of lining loose or missing, or cracks less than 5 mm – minor repair required, but structural integrity not compromised

4

Poor - Severe erosion/significant amounts of lining loose or missing, or cracks between 5 and 15 mm, – requires replacement or major repair within 3-5 years

5

Very poor – Unlined sides of structure are un-formed, structure unsafe, major amounts of lining loose or missing, or cracks greater than 15 mm – requires replacement within next 3 years




              1. Serviceability condition – water quality improvement devices

Asset

Grade

Description

GPT/

artificial wetlands



1

Very good condition – no cleaning required

3

Fair condition

Some debris has accumulated - cleaning expected within 3 months

Vegetation becoming overgrown – some harvesting required within 3 months


5

Unserviceable

Structure is not providing its function as excessive debris has accumulated – cleaning required

Overgrown vegetation and/or a number of dead plants. Limited hydraulic capacity and/or treatment capability – remediation required


  1. The condition assessment is only relevant to installed water quality treatment devices. If no devices are installed (i.e. direct outflow), then the condition assessment is not relevant.




    1. Download 336.97 Kb.

      Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page