By mark hicks gail forsyth-vail, developmental editor



Download 1.53 Mb.
Page24/28
Date29.07.2017
Size1.53 Mb.
#24750
1   ...   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28

Find Out More

The UUA Multicultural Growth & Witness staff group offers resources, curricula, trainings, and tools to help Unitarian Universalist congregations and leaders engage in the work of antiracism, antioppression, and multiculturalism. Visit www.uua.org/multicultural (at www.uua.org/multicultural) or email multicultural @ uua.org (at mailto:multicultural@uua.org) to learn more.




Workshop 20: Putting Antioppression Ideals Into Practice

Introduction

In my vision of a beloved community, I see a dazzling, light-filled, breathtakingly beautiful mosaic, a gigantic, all-encompassing mosaic, where each of us can see, can really see, and deeply appreciate each piece. We know that each piece is of immeasurable value. We know that each piece is part of a larger whole, a larger whole that would not be whole, indeed would not BE, without each piece shining through, and being seen and appreciated as its unique self. — Marla Scharf, First Unitarian Church of San Jose, California

This workshop invites participants to put what they have learned into action and to apply knowledge, skills, and critical thinking about multicultural issues to congregational scenarios. There are two activity options presented, either of which will help participants acquire and expand skills and competencies for building and participating in multicultural community. The first is a simulation, in which participants play roles of committee members, leaders, and congregants at a pivotal moment in the life of a hypothetical congregation. The second option engages participants in creating and acting out case studies that reflect actual congregational situations. Either activity requires two full workshops to complete. You will want to consider such factors as group size and style and the learning strengths, challenges, and preferences of individuals as you choose between the two options.

The simulation option invites participants to choose a particular role and stay in character through this and the following workshop. It invites participants to improvise actions and reactions, responding both to other participants and to "wild cards" introduced by the facilitators to increase complexity and learning.

The case study option invites participants to work from a bare "what happened" outline to flesh out participant and situation background, motivations, actions, and reactions. Participants in this activity prepare and present a brief skit to highlight the dilemma and propose actions and responses consonant with antiracist/multicultural community.

Before leading this workshop, review the accessibility guidelines in the program Introduction under Integrating All Participants.

Goals

This workshop will:



  • Engage participants in applying knowledge about multicultural issues to a congregational scenario.

Learning Objectives

Participants will:



  • Apply knowledge, skills, and critical thinking about multicultural issues

  • Develop, practice, and strengthen multicultural competencies through role-playing, either by participating in a simulation about a pivotal moment in the life of a particular congregation or engaging with case studies that reflect actual congregational situations.

Workshop-at-a-Glance

Activity

Minutes

Welcoming and Entering

0

Opening

3

Activity 1: Simulation, Part One

115

Closing

2

Alternate Activity 1: Case Studies, Part One

115







Spiritual Preparation

This workshop will challenge not only the participants, but also the facilitators. There are likely to be moments when the group will feel stressed by the challenge of the activity. Remind yourself that the stress and the challenge are necessary in order for learning to take place. Prepare yourself to embrace uncertainty and to trust both what will unfold in the workshop and your ability to respond appropriately.

Using music, meditation, prayer, walking outdoors, or another familiar spiritual practice, take some time to center yourself and prepare to be fully present to the challenges, ambiguities, wisdom, and spiritual deepening as they unfold in this workshop.

Welcoming and Entering

Materials for Activity


  • Sign-in sheet and pen or pencil

  • Name tags for participants (durable or single-use) and bold markers

  • Optional: Music and player

  • Optional: Snacks and beverages

Preparation for Activity

  • Arrange chairs in a circle and set out name tags and markers on a table.

  • Optional: Play music softly in the background.

  • Optional: Set out snacks and beverages.

Description of Activity

Greet participants as they arrive.



Opening (3 minutes)

Materials for Activity

  • Worship table or designated space

  • Chalice, candle, and lighter or LED battery-operated candle

  • List of this workshop's Goals and Learning Objectives

  • Covenant established in Workshop 1

  • Newsprint, markers, and tape

  • Optional: Meditative music and player Piano or keyboard

Preparation for Activity

  • Write workshop Goals and Learning Objectives on newsprint, and post.

Description of Activity

Welcome participants and remind them of the spirit of their covenant. Share the Goals and Learning Objectives for this workshop.

Light the chalice and share these words from writer and educator Paul Kivel:

Cultural competence is not something we have or don't have. It is a process of learning about and becoming allies with people from other cultures, thereby broadening our own understanding and ability to participate in a multicultural process. The key element to becoming more culturally competent is respect for the ways that others live in and organize the world and an openness to learn from them.



Activity 1: Simulation, Part One (115 minutes)

Materials for Activity

  • Newsprint, markers, and tape

  • Handout 1, Simulation Scenario and Process (included in this document)

  • Handout 2, Simulation Descriptions — Minister and Board (included in this document)

  • Handout 3, Simulation Descriptions — Social Justice Working Group (included in this document)

  • Handout 4, Simulation Descriptions — White Allies (included in this document)

  • Handout 5, Simulation Descriptions — Caucus for People of Color and People from Marginalized Racial or Ethnic Groups (included in this document)

  • Handout 6, Simulation Descriptions — Random Congregants (included in this document)

  • Congregational documents, including mission statement, recent board minutes, and current budget

  • Leader Resource 1, Job Candidates (included in this document)

  • Leader Resource 2, Wild Cards (included in this document)

  • Leader Resource 3, Getting Unstuck (included in this document)

  • Seven document folders (two for facilitators, five for the committees and groups)

Preparation for Activity

  • Copy Handout 1, Simulation Scenario and Process, for all participants. Make six copies of Handout 2, Simulation Descriptions — Minister and Board. Make eight copies of Handout 3, Simulation Descriptions — Social Justice Working Group. Make five copies of Handout 4, Simulation Descriptions — White Allies and six copies of Handout 5, Simulation Descriptions — Caucus for People of Color and People from Marginalized Racial or Ethnic Groups.

  • There are 17 specified roles in the simulation. If the group has more than 17 participants, some will craft their own role using Handout 6, Simulation Descriptions — Random Congregants. Make enough copies of Handout 6 for everyone who may need a role plus one for each facilitator.

  • Make two copies of Leader Resource 1, Job Candidates; Leader Resource 2, Wild Cards; and Leader Resource 3, Getting Unstuck.

  • Make seven copies of each congregational document.

  • Create a folder for each facilitator. Include a copy of each handout and congregational document as well as Leader Resource 1, Job Candidates; Leader Resource 2, Wild Cards; and Leader Resource 3, Getting Unstuck. Carefully read all the information and instructions to be sure you can explain the simulation and answer questions.

  • Create a folder for each committee or group in your simulation (Minister and Board, Social Justice Working Group, White Allies, Caucus for People of Color and People from Marginalized Racial or Ethnic Groups, Random Congregants). Folders should include:

    • Enough copies of Handout 1, Simulation Scenario and Process, for each member of the group to have one

    • Enough copies of the appropriate Simulation Descriptions handout for each member to have one

    • A single copy of each congregational document

  • Arrange for each group or committee to have a private meeting space or room. Make a sign for each one and post it outside the space or room.

Description of Activity

Read Handout 1, Simulation Scenario and Process to the group and answer general questions. Explain that the more energy participants put into their roles, the greater the learning. Encourage participants to really get into the characters and have fun with the process. Emphasize that this simulation is a learning experience where people can make "mistakes" in a relatively safe context.

Invite participants to choose roles, or assign roles so each group has the proper number of participants:


  • Minister and Board (1 senior minister, 3 board members)

  • Social Justice Working Group (6 people)

  • White Allies (3 people)

  • Caucus for People of Color and People from Marginalized Racial or Ethnic Groups (4 people)

  • Random Congregants (remaining persons)

Indicate the space/room where each group will meet, identified by the signs you have posted. Give each group the folder you have prepared for them. Explain that although the characters in each committee or group have been assigned genders; gender assignments may be changed for the simulation. The descriptions are provided as a starting place; participants should adjust their roles so they feel comfortable "being" that person and using that lens for a time.

Invite participants to move to their assigned group or committee spaces and begin the simulation.

Your role during the simulation is to monitor all areas of activity and keep a running record of interesting observations for processing at the end of the simulation. Note:


  • How are participants acting in antiracist ways?

  • How are participants demonstrating multicultural competencies?

  • Are they being accountable to each other and to oppressed persons?

  • How are participants avoiding conflict or responding poorly to incidents or new information?

Use Leader Resource 1, Job Candidates, Leader Resource 2, Wild Cards, and Leader Resource 3, Getting Unstuck for suggestions and information to liven up the simulation and keep participants engaged.

Continue the simulation until just before the workshop's ending time.



Including All Participants

Invite other members of the group to read character descriptions to a blind or visually impaired participant. Encourage those who are reluctant or shy to make a character their own and to inhabit that person in a way that feels comfortable for them, while still paying attention to the lens that particular character would bring to the situation.



Closing (2 minutes)

Description of Activity

Instead of a formal closing, simply bring participants together and extinguish the chalice. After the chalice is extinguished, invite participants to step outside their character before leaving the workshop. Ask them NOT to work on or talk about their plans or strategies between workshops; that is why they have no Taking It Home for this workshop.



Leader Reflection and Planning

Take a few moments right after the workshop to ask each other:



  • What went well?

  • What didn't? Why?

  • What do you think was the best moment of the workshop? Why?

  • Did anything surprise you?

  • Do we need to make any changes in the way we work together?

Alternate Activity 1: Case Studies, Part One (115 minutes)

Materials for Activity

  • Handout 7, Creating a Case Study (included in this document)

  • Handout 8, Case Study Suggestions (included in this document)

Preparation for Activity

  • Copy Handout 7, Creating a Case Study and Handout 8, Case Study Suggestions. Read the handouts and prepare to explain them and answer questions.

Description of Activity

If you perceive that the group may be uncomfortable with the simulation or has too few people for an effective simulation, use this case study exercise instead to engage participants in a congregational problem and its potential antiracist/multicultural solutions.

Form four groups of nearly equal size. Distribute Handout 7, Creating a Case Study and Handout 8, Case Study Suggestions. Invite each group to follow the instructions and develop a case study. Tell them they may choose one of the suggested case studies in Handout 8 or create one from their own experience in the congregation.

Handout 1: Simulation Scenario and Process

THE SCENARIO

The Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Anytown has been growing by leaps and bounds for several years. This growth has resulted from new ministerial leadership as well as the congregation's well-publicized stances on behalf of equal marriage and in support of immigrant families. Because the congregation has taken a risky public stance, it has the esteem of social justice progressives in the community. To build on its momentum, the minister has recommended to the board that the congregation create a new, full-time, staff position: director of social justice. The Board has welcomed and accepted the minister's request to consider the new position.



INHABITING YOUR ROLE

Each of you is a member of the congregation, assigned to a specific role. Your task is to play out the scenario in real time through the lens of the role to which you are assigned. The Board is required to post the job description and process for interviewing and hiring no later than 90 minutes into the simulation. The Board may choose any criteria and process they believe are appropriate. Next time we meet, in Workshop 21, we will continue the simulation. Then, the Board will be required to hold a congregational meeting to discuss the position 15 minutes into the opening of the workshop.

Although the characters in each committee or group have been assigned genders, gender assignments may be changed for the simulation. The descriptions are meant to be a starting place, adjust your role so you feel comfortable "being" that person and using that lens for a time. You are asked to "inhabit" your character from the moment the simulation begins. Under no circumstances should you step out of character until after the simulation. All actions and decisions are to be made using the lens of the character. Think: "How would this person respond to this situation?" Refer back to the voices, issues, insights, and problems raised over the course of the program to guide your actions and responses.

Do not share character descriptions outside of your simulation group. Part of the learning is figuring out the assumptions and values of other people. Treat all participants with respect, even if you disagree with them.


WORKING AS A GROUP

Develop a plan of action:



  • What does the group need to know about the situation?

  • How might you get that information?

  • How can the interests and needs of your group be met?

  • How can and should this group influence the outcome of the search and hiring process?

Groups can choose any path: They can call a meeting of the Board, or they can mount a resistance movement. They can do nothing, and wait for people to approach them. They can refuse to pledge next year because they don't think the congregation has the money to support a full-time position. The Board can operate in Executive Session, only taking questions in public settings. Use your imagination and your knowledge of the lens of your particular character(s) to guide individual and group actions.

WILD CARDS AND OTHER CHALLENGES

Facilitators will, at their discretion, insert a "Wild Card" scenario into the mix to add layers of complexity to the simulation. You must respond—or choose not to respond—to this new information. Facilitators may "coach" any group that appears to be stuck. Facilitators will also play the roles of two job candidates at relevant points in the simulation.

Have fun!!

Handout 2: Simulation Descriptions — Minister and Board

The Minister

Rev. Christopher Emerson is a 43-year-old, single White male who is a third-generation Unitarian Universalist minister. He is known for his enthusiasm, charisma, and considerable oratorical skills. He spends an extraordinary amount of time doing the work of the congregation and has little personal time; the congregation has, in effect, become his family. He is a powerful presence within the congregation and community and takes up a lot of psychic space! He graduated from an Ivy League school and has many connections to the power elite in your town. He believes in creating systems of social equity, but frames injustice as a political and class issue, as opposed to internalized systems of oppression. At the end of the day, he is invested in "making results happen."



Board of Trustees

NOTE: All members of the Board have participated in antioppression/antiracism and multicultural diversity seminars. This may or may not be known to members of the congregation.



Mike Feingold, 43, a White male of Jewish heritage, is a lifelong Unitarian Universalist who was one of the founders of the congregation. He has done major fundraising for the congregation, and is toying with the idea of becoming a Unitarian Universalist minister. He is the executive director for an arts education nonprofit. He and his wife, Polly, who is white, have two boys in the second and fourth grade.

Dennis Lewis, 52, a White male, is an economics professor who joined the congregation about three years ago. He is a widowed, single father who adopted a child from China right before his wife was killed in an auto accident 15 years ago. Dennis is very reserved and conservative in all his thinking. He is very strict with his now teenaged son and has extraordinarily high expectations. He has a reputation for being somewhat awkward socially, yet his voice carries weight within the congregation.

Carla Mosby, 39, became a Unitarian Universalist as a young adult, after having been raised in the Catholic Church. She and her partner, Brownyn, both White, are a lesbian couple with two adopted children of Color, Kennedy and Kayla. Both want a high quality religious education program for their children. They also want them to feel safe as children of Color and as children of a same-sex couple.

Handout 3: Simulation Descriptions — Social Justice Working Group

Mandy Patel, 38, a White female, is a stay-at-home mom with four children. She is very interested in environmental issues and chairs the 7th Principle Committee for the congregation. She has a perky personality, but often takes on too much and is seen by many as disorganized.

Mike Freeman, 17, a White male, is an active member of the youth group. He notes that the youth group service trip to New Orleans last year was a life-changing experience for him. He was recruited to serve on the Social Justice Working Group after he preached a powerful sermon about how his Unitarian Universalist faith calls him to work for justice. He is not quite sure of the role he is to play in this group, and wants to avoid being tokenized as the "youth voice."

Rob Kennedy, 27, a White male, is a human rights worker by trade. He also enjoys doing carpentry and volunteers for Habitat for Humanity. He has a strong commitment to youth and often complains that the congregation never takes the views and experiences of children seriously.

Susan Roberts, 50, a White female, is a conflict resolution trainer. She has worked for the AFL-CIO as a union organizer. She is very suspicious of power, and often hijacks conversations due to her suspicions.

Dick Maasjo, 75, a White male, is a retired minister who has lived most of his life overseas. He worked for the CIA as an undercover agent. He wants to use his professional and life experiences toward the benefit of the disempowered.

Joyce Kane, 33, is a transgender member of the congregation. She just transitioned to her female self and wants to bring what she's learned about being treated as a marginal person to the social justice agenda of the congregation. Note: The person who takes this role is encouraged to choose a racial or ethnic identity for Joyce Kane.

Handout 4: Simulation Descriptions — White Allies

George Horowitz, 45, a White male, is an artist and interior designer born in the former Soviet Union. After moving to the area, he met and married a Korean woman who later died from Parkinson's Disease. The power of that experience has led him to be a crusader against social injustice towards people with disabilities.

Harmony Moon, 60, a White female, is known as the "Flower Child" of the congregation. She moved to the area to care for her dying mother, and found the Unitarian Universalist congregation to be the only sanctuary that would accept her brand of life and living. She typically introduces herself by bragging about the number of times she's been arrested for civil disobedience. Regardless of the situation, she aligns herself with the oppressed and marginalized, even when her support is unwelcome.

Chanda Blanco, 31, was born in Chile and immigrated to the United States with her family when she was ten. Few people know of her background, or that her identity was formed in a South American household. She, herself, is unsure how to negotiate that experience. Of late, she has come to understand how her white-skin privilege has shaped her life. She wants to take steps to address systematic inequality.


Download 1.53 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page