Commission staff working document



Download 1.02 Mb.
Page11/45
Date02.06.2018
Size1.02 Mb.
#52940
1   ...   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   ...   45

Biodiversity in the Baltic Sea is threatened by overfishing, by-catches and incidental catches of non-target species, invasive alien species, the destruction of habitats by human activities (such as dredging and construction along shores and migratory obstacles in waterways), eutrophication and contaminants. Climate change, thought to reduce the salinity and increase the temperature of the Baltic Sea, is also affecting aquatic biodiversity. Hence, the impact of and vulnerability to climate change is of increasing importance. Emerging pressures such as marine litter and underwater noise also play a role.


Fishing has a direct impact on the composition and diversity of fish communities in the Baltic Sea. Overfishing has resulted in the decline of numerous fish species such as salmon, eel and the extinction of the Baltic sturgeon. MSY is not reached for many species. Fishery also affects other non-targeted marine species, such as seabirds and marine mammals through by-catch mortality, and competition for food. Mobile bottom contacting fishing gears affect benthic habitats and species through by-catch, direct mortality and the alteration of the physical structure of the sea floor, re-suspension of nutrients and hazardous substances.
To respond to these diverse threats, actions have to be twofold: to minimise the adverse effects of human activities and to establish a network of well-managed ‘Marine Protected Areas’.
It is important that those HELCOM Contracting Parties, that are also EU MSs at the same time, carefully fulfil the obligations and implementation needs of the relevant EU legislation. In particular, the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020, the CFP, the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive, the Birds and Habitats Directives, should be the key tools to ensure that environment protection and preservation aspects are integrated into all relevant priority areas of this Strategy.
Efforts should also be given to envisage how environmental aspects could be more taken into account by the Common Fisheries Policy. On an overall level, this priority area aims to give political support to the timely implementation of the Biodiversity and Nature Conservation Segment of the HELCOM BSAP.
The BONUS Joint Baltic Sea Research and Development Programme20 is a natural ally in the work to protect biodiversity and prevent pollution.
Targets and indicators

A comprehensive system for the design, the monitoring and the follow-up of indicators and targets will be set up in 2013, under the responsibility of the priority area coordinator. The still missing targets and deadline, baseline, and statistics/information sources related to the below indicators will be defined.




Indicator

Baseline

Target/Deadline

Data Sources

Number of Baltic Sea Protected Areas (BSPAs) with management plans in place of the total number of BSPAs, including integration of fisheries management measures in management plans.

In February 2010,21 34 out of 159 (approx. 21%) had management measures in force.

To develop and apply management plans and/or measures for already existing BSPAs by 2015

Every new BSPA designation should be followed by the establishment of a management plan and/or measures within five years.




Existing HELCOM database

HELCOM BSEP 124B.





Implement Habitat restoration measures.

Status of restoration plans for migratory fish in 2010.22

All restoration plans have put in place and implemented by 2020.


Inventory and classification23

HELCOM BSEP 126 A.


The active conservation of endangered/threatened wild salmon river populations and native Baltic Sea salmon populations in potential salmon rivers.

22 ‘red’ salmon populations according to MSY traffic lights in 200924 (original salmon populations that should be prioritised for conservation).

The active conservation of at least ten endangered/threatened wild salmon river populations and reintroduction of native Baltic Sea salmon in at least four potential salmon rivers by 2013 (BSAP)

Abundance of salmon population: the assessment of GES is based on the smolt production in the rivers of wild salmon stocks. The rivers’ potential smolt production capacity (PSPC) has been estimated and the target (so-called GES boundary) is to reach 80% of the PSPC by 2015.



HELCOM BSEP 126 A

SALAR II work (proposed follow-up of SALAR project)

Coreset Indicator on salmon abundance.



Download 1.02 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   ...   45




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page