Chapter 1: "Models versus Experts" In this chapter, the "Experts" initially had harsh words for the "Models" until they had shown acceptable results over time.
What are your thoughts about the initial examples provided in this chapter regarding the Models and the responses from the Experts? I doubted that the models could do a better job than the experts.
I was in the same region as Robert Parker, the world’s most influential wine expert who said “Ashenfelter is an absolute total sham” like a movie critic.1
Using CART model is more acceptable for the SCOTUS by using one tree to predict liberal decision, and another tree to conservative decision.2
Healthcare Quality Assessment can be done by using logistics response Function:
Good quality care educates patients and controls costs
Should experts be more open to change for the better? Why or why not? Experts should be open to using Models as a teammate to make their analysis better since experts can be limited in the amount of information that they can use.
