Annexure to the 1987 India-Sri Lanka Agreement
1. His Excellency the President of Sri Lanka and the Prime Minister of India agree that the referendum mentioned in paragraph 2 and its sub-paragraphs of the Agreement will be observed by a representative of the Election Commission of India to be invited by His Excellency the President of Sri Lanka.
2. Similarly, both Heads of Government agree that the elections to the Provincial Council mentioned in paragraph 2.8 of the Agreement will be observed and all para military personnel will be withdrawn from the Eastern and Northern Provinces with a view to creating conditions conducive to fair elections to the Council.
3. The President, in his discretion, shall absorb such para military forces, which came into being due to the ethnic violence, into the regular security forces of Sri Lanka.
4. The President of Sri Lanka and the Prime Minister of India agree that the Tamil Militants shall surrender their arms to authorities agreed upon to be designated by the President of Sri Lanka. The surrender shall take place in the presence of one senior representative each of the Sri Lanka Red Cross and the India Red Cross.
5. The President of Sri Lanka and the Prime Minister of India agree that a Joint Indo Sri Lankan Observer Group consisting of qualified representatives of the government of Sri Lanka and the government of India would monitor the cessation of hostilities from 31 July 1987.
6. The President of Sri Lanka and the Prime Minister of India also agree that in terms of paragraph 2.14 and paragraph 2.16 (C) of the Agreement, an Indian Peace Keeping Contingent may be invited by the President of Sri Lanka to guarantee and enforce the cessation of hostilities, if so required.
Source: Tamilnation.org
Appendix B
Exchange of letters between the President of Sri Lanka and the Prime Minister of India
July 29, 1987
Excellency,
Please refer to your letter dated the 29th of July 1987, which reads as follows:-
Excellency,
Conscious of the friendship between our two countries stretching over two millennia and more, and recognising the importance of nurturing this traditional friendship, it is imperative that both Sri Lanka and India reaffirm the decision not to allow our respective territories to be used for activities prejudicial to each other's unity, territorial integrity and security.
2. In this spirit, you had, during the course of our discussion, agreed to meet some of India's concerns as follows:-
I) Your Excellency and myself will reach an early understanding about the relevance and employment of foreign military and intelligence personnel with a view to ensuring that such presences will not prejudice Indo Sri Lanka relations.
II) Trincomalee or any other ports in Sri Lanka will not be made available for military use by any country in a manner prejudicial to India's interests.
III) The work of restoring and operating the Trincomalee Oil Tank will be undertaken as a joint operation between India and Sri Lanka.
IV) Sri Lanka's agreement with foreign broadcasting organisations will be reviewed to ensure that any facilities set up by them in Sri Lanka are used solely as public broadcasting facilities and not for any military or intelligence purposes.
3. In the same spirit, India will:
I) Deport all Sri Lankan citizens who are found to be engaging in terrorist activities or advocating separatism or secessionism.
II) Provide training facilities and military supplies for Sri Lanka security services.
4. India and Sri Lanka have agreed to set up a joint consultative mechanism to continuously review matters of common concern in the light of the objectives stated in para 1 and specifically to monitor the implementation of other matters contained in this letter.
5. Kindly confirm, Excellency, that the above correctly sets out the Agreement reached between us.
Please accept, Excellency, the assurances of my highest consideration.
Yours sincerely, sgd Rajiv Gandhi
His Excellency,
Mr. J.R. Jayawardene,
President of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka,
Colombo.
This is to confirm that the above correctly sets out the understanding reached between us.
Please accept, Excellency, the assurances of my highest consideration.
sgd J.R. Jayawardene President.
His Excellency, Mr. Rajiv Gandhi, Prime Minister of the Republic of India, New Delhi.
Source: Tamilnation.org
Bibliography
Adeney, Katherine and Andrew Wyatt. 2004. “Democracy in South Asia: Getting beyond the structure-
agency dichotomy.” Political Studies 52, no. 1, pp. 1-18.
Bajaj. Vikas. 2010. “Sri Lanka loses E.U. trade benefit.” New York Times. Accessed July 1, 2012.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/07/business/global/07trade.html.
Bajoria, Jayshree. 2009. “The Sri Lankan conflict.” Council of Foreign Relations. Washington, DC. May
18. Accessed July10. http://www.cfr.org/terrorist-organizations/sri-lankan-conflict/p11407.
Bose, Sugata. 1994. Sri Lanka, India and the Tamil Eelam Movement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications.
Bose, Sumantra. 2004. “Decolonization and state building in South Asia.” Journal of International Affairs
58, no. 1, pp. 95-113.
Central Bank of Sri Lanka 2011. “Annual Report 2011.” Central Bank of Sri Lanka. Accessed July 12,
2012.
http://www.cbsl.gov.lk/pics_n_docs/10_pub/_docs/efr/annual_report/AR2011/English/9_Chapter
_05.pdf.
Central Bank of Sri Lanka. 2012. “Economics and Social Statistics of Sri Lanka.” Central Bank of Sri
Lanka. Accessed July 12, 2012.
http://www.cbsl.gov.lk/pics_n_docs/10_pub/_docs/statistics/other/econ_&_ss_2012.pdf.
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). 2012. The World Factbook: Sri Lanka. Washington, DC. Accessed
July 2, 2012. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ce.html.
Chiriyankandath, James. 2004. “Realigning India: Indian Foreign Policy after the Cold War.” The Round
Table 93, no. 374, pp. 199-211.
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Daniel, Devan. 2010. “Indo-Lanka FTA is ten years old.” The Island Online (Colombo). March 15.
Accessed July 12, 2012. http://www.island.lk/2010/03/15/business1.html.
Das, R. N. 2010. “China’s foray into Sri Lanka and India’s response.” Institute for Defence Studies and
Analyses (IDSA). New Delhi, India. January 4. Accessed June 20, 2012.
http://www.idsa.in/idsacomments/ChinasForayintoSriLankaandIndiasResponse_rndas_050810.
Dayaratne, Hemantha. 2011. “A new phase in India-Sri Lanka relations.” Institute of Defence Studies and
Analyses (IDSA). New Delhi, India. January 3. Accessed July 5, 2012.
http://www.idsa.in/idsacomments/ANewPhaseinIndiaSriLankaRelations_hdayaratne_030111.
De Alwis, Malathi. 2010. “The ‘China factor’ in post-war Sri Lanka.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 11, no.
3, pp. 434-446.
De Silva, Kingsley M. 1981. A History of Sri Lanka. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Deegalle, Mahinda. 2004. “Politics of the Jathika Hela Urumaya monks: Buddhism and ethnicity in
contemporary Sri Lanka.” Contemporary Buddhism: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5, no. 2, pp. 83-
103.
DeVotta, Neil. 2005. “From ethnic outbidding to ethnic conflict: The institutional bases of Sri Lanka’s
separatist war.” Nations and Nationalism 11, no. 1, pp. 141-159.
Dryzek, John S. 1996. “Political inclusion and the dynamics of democratization.” The American Political
Science Review 90, no. 3, pp. 475-487.
Dukkipati, Uttara and Teresita Schaffer. 2010. “Sri Lanka: Political consolidation without
reconciliation?” Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). Number 142. Washington,
DC. June 15. Accessed June 10, 2012. http://csis.org/files/publication/sam_142.pdf.
Embree, Ainslie. 1997. “Statehood in South Asia.” Journal of International Affairs, 51, no. 1, pp. 1-18.
Fair, C. Christine. 2005. “Diaspora involvement in insurgencies: Insights from the Khalistan and Tamil
Eelam movements.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 11: 125-156.
Goodhand, Jonathan. 2012. “Sri Lanka in 2011: Consolidation and militarization of the post-war regime.”
Asian Survey 52, no. 1, pp. 130-137.
Grover, V. K. 2001. “India: The Need for a Post-Cold War Foreign Policy and the Importance of the EU.”
India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs 57, no. 1, pp. 171-176.
Gurr, Ted R. 1993. Minorities at risk? A global view of ethnopolitical conflicts. Washington, DC: United
States Institute of Peace Press.
———. 2000. Peoples versus states: Minorities at risk in the new century. Washington DC: United States
Institute of Peace Press.
Hariharan, R. (Col.). 2012. “Impact of UNHRC resolution on India-Sri Lanka relations.” South Asia
Analysis Group. Paper no. 4479. March 26. New Delhi, India. Accessed July 15, 2012.
http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers50/paper4979.html.
Harilal, K. N. and K. J. Joseph. 1999. “India-Sri Lanka Free Trade Accord.” Economic and Political
Weekly 34, no. 13, pp. 750-753.
Hilali, Agha Z. 2001. “India’s Strategic Thinking and its National Security Policy.” Asian Survey 41, no.
5, pp. 737-764.
Imtiyaz, A. R. M. and Ben Stavis. 2008. “Ethno-political conflict in Sri Lanka.” Journal of Third World
Studies 25, no. 2, pp. 135-152.
International Crisis Group. 2011. “India and Sri Lanka after the LTTE.” International Crisis Group. Asia
Report No. 206. Brussels, Belgium. 23 June.
http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/asia/south-asia/sri-
lanka/206%20India%20and%20Sri%20Lanka%20after%20the%20LTTE.pdf.
Jain, Bakhtawar M. 2010. India in the new South Asia: Strategic, military and economic concerns in the
age of nuclear diplomacy. London: I. B. Tauris.
Kelegama, Saman and Indra Nath Mukherji. 2007. “India-Sri Lanka bilateral free trade agreement: Six
years performance and beyond.” Research and Information System for Developing Countries (RIS). RIS-DP no. 119. New Delhi, India. February. Accessed July 1, 2012. http://www.ips.lk/staff/ed/latest_essays/downloads/discussion_paper_isbfta.pdf.
Kodikara, Shelton U. 1995. “Genesis of the Indo-Sri Lanka agreement.” Contemporary South Asia 4, no.
2, pp. 171-185.
Kumaratunga, Chandrika. 1996. “A new approach.” Harvard International Review 18, no. 3, pp. 36-40.
La, John. 2004. “Forced remittances in Canada’s Tamil enclaves.” Peace Review 16, no. 3, pp. 379-385.
Linz, Juan J. and Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern
Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Little, David. 1994. Sri Lanka: The invention of enmity. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace
Press.
Mehta, Pratap B. 2009. “Still under Nehru’s Shadow? The Absence of Foreign Policy Frameworks in
India.” India Review 8, no. 3, pp. 209-233.
Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India. 2012. Export-Import Data Bank. Ministry of
Commerce and Industry, Government of India. New Delhi, India.
Accessed May 25, 2012. http://commerce.nic.in/eidb/default.asp.
Mohan, C. Raja. 2004. Crossing the Rubicon: The Shaping of India’s New Foreign Policy. New York:
Palgrave MacMillan.
Mumtaz, C. Yusuf. 2004. “US policy toward the continuing conflict in Sri Lanka.” Nathan Hale Foreign
Policy Society (NHFPS). Policy Background & Options Paper 2.04. Washington, DC. April.
Accessed May 15, 2012. http://www.foreignpolicysociety.org/sri-lanka.pdf.
Muralidhar Reddy, B. 2008. “India, Sri Lanka finalize trade agreement.” The Hindu (Chennai). July 10.
Accessed July 12, 2012. http://www.hindu.com/2008/07/10/stories/2008071060741200.htm.
Office of the United States Trade Representative. 2012. “Sri Lanka.” Office of the United States Trade
Representative. Washington, DC. Accessed June 10, 2012. http://www.ustr.gov/countries-regions/south-central-asia/sri-lanka.
Pant, Harsh. 2008. Contemporary Debates in Indian Foreign and Security Policy: India Negotiates its
Rise in the International System. New York: Palgrave.
Pattanaik, Smruti. 2012. “A wake up call for Sri Lanka at the UNHRC.” Institute of Defence Studies and
Analyses (IDSA). New Delhi, India. April 9. Accessed June 28, 2012.
http://www.idsa.in/idsacomments/AWakeupCallforSriLankaattheUNHRC_sspattanaik_090412.
Pradhan, Gyan. 2001. “Economic cost of Sri Lanka’s ethnic conflict.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 31,
no. 3, pp.375-384.
Radhakrishnan, R. K. 2011. “Joint group to work out India-Sri Lanka fishing issues.” The Hindu
(Chennai). October 11. Accessed July 1, 2012.
http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/article2526552.ece.
Samarasinghe, S. W. R. de A. 2009. “Sri Lanka: The challenge of postwar peace building, state building,
and nation building.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 15: 436-461.
Schaffer, Teresita C. 2012. “Sri Lanka’s day of reckoning.” The Hindu (Chennai). March 22. Accessed
March 12, 2012. http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/article3025593.ece.
Sen Gupta, B. 1983. “The Indian Doctrine.” India Today, 31 August, p. 20.
Sultana, Gulbin. 2012. “UNHRC resolution on Sri Lanka: India’s options.” Institute of Defence Studies
and Analyses (IDSA). New Delhi, India. March 19. Accessed July 10, 2012.
http://www.idsa.in/idsacomments/UNHRCResolutiononSriLankaIndiasOptions_gsultana_190312
Tanham, George. 1992. Indian Strategic Thought: An Interpretive Essay. Santa Monica, C.A.: Rand
Corporation.
Tamilnation.org. “Indo Sri Lanka Agreement, 1987 – Documents”. Accessed June 5, 2012.
http://tamilnation.co/conflictresolution/tamileelam/87peaceaccord.htm#Exchange of letters.
Thornton, Thomas P. 1992. “India adrift: The search for moorings in a new world order.” Asian Survey
32, no. 12, pp. 1063-1077.
Uyangoda, Jayadeva. 2010. “Sri Lanka in 2009: From civil war to political uncertainties.” Asian Survey
50, no. 1, pp. 104-111.
Vaughn, Bruce. 2011. “Sri Lanka: Background and U.S. relations.” Congressional Research Service.
Washington, DC. June 16. Accessed July 20, 2012. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL31707.pdf.
Wedagedara, Amail. 2011. “The continuing ‘State of Emergency’ in Sri Lanka.” Institute of Defence
Studies and Analyses (IDSA). New Delhi, India. September 5. Accessed July 15, 2012.
http://www.idsa.in/idsacomments/TheContinuingStateofEmergencyinSriLanka_awedagedara_05
0911.
Weerakoon, Dushni and Jayanthi Thennakoon. 2006. “India-Sri Lankan FTA: Lessons for SAFTA.”
Commonwealth Secretariat/Consumer Unity and Trust Society (CUTS) International. Accessed
June 20, 2012. http://www.thecommonwealth.org/files/178424/FileName/India-
Sri%2520Lanka%2520FTA--Lessons%2520for%2520SAFTA--Final.pdf.
Wilson, A. Jeyaratnam. 1999. “Ceylon (Sri Lanka’s) passage to independence: A documentary source on
colonial demission, proconsuls and proto-nationalists.” The Round Table 39, pp. 97-108.
World Bank (2012). “Sri Lanka: GDP growth (annual %).” World Bank Data-World Development
Indicators and Global Development Finance. Accessed July 12, 2012.
http://databank.worldbank.org/ddp/html-jsp/QuickViewReport.jsp?RowAxis=WDI_Series~&ColAxis=WDI_Time~&PageAxis=WDI_Ctry~&PageAxisCaption=Country~&RowAxisCaption=Series~&ColAxisCaption=Time~&NEW_REPORT_SCALE=1&NEW_REPORT_PRECISION=0.0&newReport=yes&ROW_COUNT=1&COLUMN_COUNT=27&PAGE_COUNT=1&COMMA_SEP=true.
Young, Iris M. 2000. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zakaria, Fareed. 2007. The future of freedom: Illiberal democracy at home and abroad. New York: W.
W. Norton & Company, Inc.
1
Notes
The civil war in Sri Lanka has hampered the process of carrying out census in the Tamil-dominated North and East. The 2001 census was therefore deemed to have grossly understated the number of Sri Lankan Tamils. As such, the Government of Sri Lanka revised the Tamil population estimate. They were believed to constitute 18% of the total population of the island, as reported by the CIA World Factbook (2012).
2 The semi-presidential system includes a president and a prime minister who work together to govern the country. The President is directly elected by the people. He/she appoints the Prime Minister, who is the leader of the party with the majority in Parliament, and therefore responsible to the legislature. Sometimes, the President and Prime Minister may come from different political parties, a situation known as ‘cohabitation’.
3 Gurr (1993, 2000), Horowitz (2000) and Linz and Stepan (1996) have argued that political exclusion of cultural groups may lead to erosion of democracy and ethnic conflict.
4 Unlike the other smaller countries of South Asia, Sri Lanka has a long tradition of civilian rule and representative government. There has not been a break in civilian rule since independence. However, with the conclusion of the civil war Sri Lanka is a country undergoing change. As such, this section is titled ‘political transition’ instead of ‘democratic transition’. Nevertheless, some of the challenges that Sri Lanka’s democracy faces today are not altogether different from the challenges facing the fledgling democracies of Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Nepal.
Share with your friends: |