Draft regulation Impact Statement for Underrun Protection a draft statement inviting discussion and comments from parties affected by the proposed heavy commercial vehicle safety initiative January 2007 Report Documentation Page



Download 5.27 Mb.
Page46/50
Date05.05.2018
Size5.27 Mb.
#47808
1   ...   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50




Scenario B1 Alternative Method - rigid vehicles

Worst Case 12%

Discount rate










































Year

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

Number of fleet fitted with UP

(,000)


0.0

9.7

19.4

29.1

38.8

48.5

58.2

67.9

77.6

87.3

97.0

106.7

116.4

Percentage of fleet fitted with UP

(%)


0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%











































Front UP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




 

 

Benefits from percentage of fleet

fitted with UP ($m)



0.0

1.8

3.6

5.3

7.1

8.9

10.7

12.4

14.2

16.0

17.8

19.5

21.3

Present Value (PV) of the Benefit

0.0

1.6

2.8

3.8

4.5

5.0

5.4

5.6

5.7

5.8

5.7

5.6

5.5

Cumulative PV of the Benefit

0.0

1.6

4.4

8.2

12.7

17.8

23.2

28.8

34.5

40.3

46.0

51.6

57.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




 

 

Installation cost of UP for new

vehicles ($m)



4.3

4.3

4.3

4.3

4.3

4.3

4.3

4.3

4.3

4.3

4.3

4.3

4.3

Present Value (PV) of the Cost

4.3

3.8

3.4

3.0

2.7

2.4

2.2

1.9

1.7

1.5

1.4

1.2

1.1

Cumulative PV of the Cost

4.3

8.1

11.5

14.5

17.2

19.6

21.8

23.7

25.5

27.0

28.4

29.6

30.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




 

 

Net Present Value (NPV)

-4.3

-6.5

-7.1

-6.3

-4.5

-1.9

1.3

5.0

9.0

13.3

17.6

22.0

26.4

Benefit/Cost Ratio (BCR)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.7

0.9

1.1

1.2

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.9











































Side UP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




 

 

Benefits from percentage of fleet

fitted with UP ($m)



0.0

0.4

0.8

1.1

1.5

1.9

2.3

2.6

3.0

3.4

3.8

4.1

4.5

Present Value (PV) of the Benefit

0.0

0.3

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.1

1.1

1.2

1.2

1.2

1.2

1.2

1.2

Cumulative PV of the Benefit

0.0

0.3

0.9

1.7

2.7

3.8

4.9

6.1

7.3

8.5

9.7

10.9

12.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




 

 

Installation cost of UP for new

vehicles ($m)



8.2

8.2

8.2

8.2

8.2

8.2

8.2

8.2

8.2

8.2

8.2

8.2

8.2

Present Value (PV) of the Cost

8.2

7.3

6.5

5.8

5.2

4.7

4.2

3.7

3.3

3.0

2.6

2.4

2.1

Cumulative PV of the Cost

8.2

15.5

22.1

27.9

33.1

37.8

42.0

45.7

49.0

52.0

54.6

57.0

59.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




 

 

Net Present Value (NPV)

-8.2

-15.2

-21.1

-26.2

-30.5

-34.0

-37.1

-39.6

-41.7

-43.4

-44.9

-46.0

-47.0

Benefit/Cost Ratio (BCR)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2











































Rear UP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




 

 

Benefits from percentage of fleet

fitted with UP ($m)



0.0

0.2

0.5

0.7

0.9

1.1

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.3

2.5

2.7

Present Value (PV) of the Benefit

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.6

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.7

Cumulative PV of the Benefit

0.0

0.2

0.6

1.1

1.6

2.3

3.0

3.7

4.4

5.2

5.9

6.6

7.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




 

 

Installation cost of UP for new

vehicles ($m)



7.5

7.5

7.5

7.5

7.5

7.5

7.5

7.5

7.5

7.5

7.5

7.5

7.5

Present Value (PV) of the Cost

7.5

6.7

6.0

5.3

4.8

4.3

3.8

3.4

3.0

2.7

2.4

2.2

1.9

Cumulative PV of the Cost

7.5

14.2

20.2

25.5

30.3

34.5

38.3

41.7

44.7

47.4

49.9

52.0

53.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




 

 

Net Present Value (NPV)

-7.5

-14.0

-19.6

-24.4

-28.6

-32.2

-35.3

-38.0

-40.3

-42.3

-44.0

-45.4

-46.6

Benefit/Cost Ratio (BCR)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1


Download 5.27 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page