Eco Business: Lighting the Dark Continent, by Achim Steiner, Adnan Amin, and Kandeh K. Yumkella


South Africa: Imagining the Great Green Wall of Africa



Download 302.1 Kb.
Page4/9
Date18.10.2016
Size302.1 Kb.
#2972
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9

South Africa: Imagining the Great Green Wall of Africa


Despite the United Nation's recent declaration that the deadly Horn of Africa famine of 2011 has finally ended, it remains an obvious and inescapable certainty that the continent will soon confront another convergence of climatic, political and economic problems that produces a similar tragedy. An integral characteristic of regions at risk, particularly the famine-prone Sahel region, is the continued human insecurity of many of its inhabitants, not simply in terms of food, but also water, land and livelihood. The Sahel region of Africa is an environmental zone stretching from Djibouti in the Horn of Africa to the Atlantic coastlines of Senegal and Mauritania.

One such project that is successfully attracting and exciting the imaginations of local stakeholders, international donors and global environmentalists is the proposed Great Green Wall (GGW). This ambitious project is immense in both its scope and the possible consequences it could have on the geographical and political-economic fortunes of the peoples and states in the Sahel and beyond. In effect an approximately 8000 km long, 15km wide belt of trees and bushes would be planted, cultivated or regenerated across the entire length of the Sahel, in order to safeguard against any southward encroachment of the Sahara, thereby preventing further desertification. Behind this green safety barrier Sahel countries would theoretically be able to increase the yield of the land to feed growing populations. Increasing vegetation cover ensures that water is retained as it causes rain water to seep into the ground rather than disappear as run-off, which would otherwise carry away vital top soil. The project has also received widespread backing from a number of international and non-governmental organizations such as the UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) and the Global Environment Facility (GEF), which has pledged support in the region of $115 million in grants and investments.



Back to Menu

_________________________________________________________________

Africa: Ending Poverty Need Not Be At the Expense of the Environment

13 February 2012

Ending poverty need put no additional stress on the planet's natural resources, according to a new report published today by international agency Oxfam.

According to the paper's author Kate Raworth, human deprivation and environmental degradation must be tackled together as humanity's two major operating boundaries - "social boundaries" like hunger, inequality and ill-health and the "planetary or environmental boundaries" like climate change and biodiversity loss - are inextricably linked.

"By seeing the whole we can understand that solving food, energy and income poverty could be achieved with almost no impact on our planetary boundaries. Any vision of sustainable development must recognise that eradicating poverty and social injustice is inextricably linked to ecological stability and renewal," said Raworth.

Oxfam has published the discussion paper "A Safe and Just Space for Humanity - Can We Live Within The Doughnut?" as a contribution to the debate in the run-up to the UN conference on sustainable development (Rio+20) in June. The paper suggests a new way of approaching economic development within environmental and social limits. Oxfam discussion papers are intended to encourage public debate but do not represent Oxfam policy.

The Stockholm Resilience Center originally published the concept of nine planetary boundaries, beyond which lies unacceptable environmental degradation. To these, Raworth has added the concept of social boundaries, below which lies unacceptable human deprivation.

Together, the two sets of boundaries create an area - shaped like a doughnut - that defines an environmentally safe and socially just space for humanity to thrive in. This simple visual framework brings together the social, environmental and economic priorities that underpin inclusive and sustainable development.

Data shows that we are far from living "within the doughnut". Raworth estimates that humanity is falling far below the social foundation on at least eight of the 11 social boundaries. Nearly 900 million people face hunger, 1.4 billion live on less than $1.25 per day, and 2.7 billion have no access to clean cooking facilities.

At the same time, the environmental ceiling has already been crossed for at least three of the nine planetary boundaries, on climate change, biodiversity loss and nitrogen use.

The paper suggests that economic development must aim to bring humanity into the safe and just space, ending deprivation and keeping within safe use of the earth's limited resources. Traditional growth policies have largely failed to deliver on both accounts: far too few benefits of GDP growth have gone to people living in poverty, and far too much of GDP's rise has been at the cost of degrading natural resources.

"For too long environmental, social and economic concerns have been handled as separate issues but the rising global challenges of climate change, financial crises, food price volatility and commodity price increases show that these issues are unavoidably interconnected and must be tackled together," said Raworth.

The paper shows that ending poverty need not be a source of stress on planetary boundaries.

Food: Providing the additional calories needed by the 13 percent of the world's population facing hunger would require just one percent of the current global food supply.

Energy: Bringing electricity to the 19 percent of people who currently lack it could be achieved with a less than one percent increase in global CO2 emissions.

Income: Ending income poverty for the 21 percent of people who live on less than $1.25 a day would require just 0.2 percent of global income.

The paper says that the real source of stress on these planetary boundaries is the excessive resource use by roughly the richest 10 percent of people in the world, backed up by the aspirations of a rapidly growing global middle class seeking to emulate those unsustainable lifestyles.

The discussion paper has been produced as part of Oxfam's GROW campaign which is committed to creating a better future, ensuring food security and prosperity for all in a resource-constrained world.



Back to Menu

_________________________________________________________________


Download 302.1 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page