Editors: Kerry



Download 18.21 Mb.
Page79/89
Date05.05.2018
Size18.21 Mb.
#47883
1   ...   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   ...   89

4A.4 Crime and justice



Table 4A.4. 1: Victims of crime by country of birth, 2005 (per cent)

Country of Birth
Born in Australia Born Overseas
Male Female Male Female

Robbery


80.8

87.7

19.2 (a)


12.3 (b)



Assault

80.7

81.4

19.3

18.6

Notes (a) relative standard error between 25 and 50%; used with caution

(b) relative standard error over 50%, too unreliable for general use

Source: ABS 2006e




Table 4A.4. 2: Feelings of safety (2005) (per cent)

Country of Birth





Born in Australia

Born Overseas

Feel safe or very safe

73.8

68.2

Feel neither safe or unsafe

14.6

16.9

Feel unsafe or very unsafe

8.0

9.1

Never home alone after dark

3.6

5.8

Source: ABS 2006e







Table 4A.4. 3: Crime and safety (per cent persons)




Born in main

Born in other countries

Not


Born in

English- speaking

Proficient in spoken

proficient in spoken
All

Feelings of safety at home alone after dark:



Australia countries English English persons

Very safe/Safe

83.1

82.0

78.5

60.1

81.6

Very unsafe/Unsafe

7.7

6.7

11.1

18.2

8.4

Victim of physical or threatened violence in last

12 months 10.1 7.8 5.8 4.0 9.0


Victim of actual or attempted

break in, in last 12 months 11.2 12.8 12.1 10.7 11.5



Source: ABS 2003c

LSIA-sourced perceptions of crime levels
The LSIA provides some important insights into how migrants perceive crime in Australia. Within the survey, migrants were asked for their impressions about the extent of crime in Australia. LSIA 1 respondents (arguably) did not see crime as a major problem although escalations in crime levels were perceived over time, increasing from about one in five to one in four migrants thinking that there was ‘a lot’ of crime. Conversely, assessments of levels of crime had lessened by the time the second wave of LSIA 2 migrants were surveyed when only about one in seven thought there was a lot of crime.
Humanitarian entrants interviewed for LSIA 1 were about three times more likely to think that there was a lot of crime by comparison with skilled business migrants. These results suggest perceptions about crime might be related to socio-economic profile of neighbourhoods in which migrants lived rather than their migrant status per se (Mukherjee 1999b). However, for LSIA 2 respondents, while humanitarian visa holders were still more likely than others to think there was a lot of crime (about 22% did so), comparatively large proportions of skilled sponsored (17%) and skilled independent (13%) migrants also thought crime levels were high. Business migrants were still least likely to have impressions that there was a lot of crime (7%).
There were also marked differences in crime level perceptions between some birthplace groups. Migrants from Northern Europe, South Eastern Europe, Oceania and the UK and Ireland held the most negative views. The groups least likely to think that there was a lot of crime in Australia (at about one-third of the level of the Northern Europeans) were those from Eastern Europe, China, Central Asia and Latin America – largely non-English speaking countries and also from Sub-Saharan Africa (including South Africa). These results suggest that perceptions about what constitutes a lot of crime might be based largely on previous experiences prior to settlement in Australia, as well place of residence upon arrival given the wide variation in crime rates across urban and rural communities (Hogg and Carrington, 2006).



Download 18.21 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   ...   89




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page