Education public



Download 5.96 Mb.
Page13/29
Date02.06.2018
Size5.96 Mb.
#52723
1   ...   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   ...   29
22 Gainful Employment rule are at public and private
23 nonprofit institutions. In fact, career education
24 programs from notable schools such as Harvard and Johns
25 Hopkins failed the standards outlined by the Gainful

1 Employment rule. But it is a fact that for-profit


2 schools were disproportionately represented among those
3 that were profiting from taxpayer funds without
4 providing a quality education. In fact, for-profit
5 education companies enroll only 10 percent of students
6 nationwide, but receive 25 percent of Pell Grants and
7 Stafford Loan dollars, and they account for 47 percent
8 of all federal student loan defaults. Further,
9 72 percent of for-profit college graduates earn less
10 than those with just a high school diploma.
11 Higher education should represent a promise
12 at career advancement, a promise of buying a home in a
13 nice neighborhood, of sending your kids to good schools.
14 For many students attending for-profit schools, however,
15 that promise is a pipe dream, not because of their own
16 work ethic, but because of the school's predatory
17 practices. The Department's decision to take action has
18 already brought relief to students. Out of the over 500
19 career education programs flagged under the Gainful
20 Employment rule, over 300 have already been shut down by
21 the institutions offering them. This is significant
22 progress. But, of course, that leaves hundreds of
23 schools with tens of thousands of students with the odds
24 stacked against them that their degree will bring
25 financial success.



1 And simply because a school closes doesn't
2 mean the problems of its former students are over. The
3 closure of ITT Tech, for example, including its 10 Texas
4 campuses saved precious student aid from many students
5 and prevented them and many others from being taken
6 advantage of. And while at the time some appeared to
7 blame students for not being suspicious enough about the
8 schools they attended, the confusion among former ITT
9 Tech students on what rights they have and how to
10 exercise them shows the need for robust enforcement of
11 the Borrowers Defense rule.
12 Currently, students face an extremely slow
13 discharge process. The Department should be putting its
14 weight and energy behind granting individual discharge
15 applications and issuing group discharges wherever
16 justified, not embarking on another set of negotiated
17 rulemaking that will yield unnecessary -- excuse me --
18 unnecessary uncertainty for students and taxpayers, at
19 best, and rob them of essential protections, at worst.
20 While higher education has, undoubtedly,
21 become business similar to any other, it is still a
22 business that should measure its success by the success
23 of its students -- and everyone has to forgive me for a
24 little bit of paper shuffling. On my way to Dallas this
25 morning, I was asked to share the following story from a



1 woman unable to make it today. Her name is Brittany
2 Prock (phonetic), and she is a Texas native who attended
3 Corinthians Everest online in Brandon campus. She says,
4 "I have faced a real traumatic hardship as a result of
5 this bogus degree and insurmountable debt. I have lost
6 my job. My home was foreclosed on during my studies at
7 Corinthian, but they assured me my degree would improve
8 my circumstances. Corinthian students are looked down
9 upon and rejected by many companies. I know because I
10 have tried to obtain employment in my field of study and
11 have been turned down many times because a company
12 doesn't see Corinthian as an actual accredited
13 university. Colleges and universities won't even look
14 at transcripts from Corinthian because of this bogus
15 accreditation. The credits are no good and will not
16 transfer. These schools have failed me as well as
17 others in making sure we had a clear-cut understanding
18 of what we were signing. I am pissed, because it was
19 the school's responsibility to do so."
20 Again, we strongly oppose the delay,
21 weakening, or elimination of the Borrower Defense and
22 Gainful Employment rules. Respectfully, we call on the
23 Department to, instead, enforce the existing rules and
24 help more students as opposed to excusing predatory
25 colleges and failing programs.



1 Thank you for the opportunity to speak
2 today.
3 MR. MANNING: Thank you.
4 MR. MARTIN: We're going to continue with
5 Mr. John Turnage.
6 MR. TURNAGE: My name is John Turnage, and
7 I want to thank you for allowing me time to express my
8 thoughts and concerns with the Gainful Employment and
9 Borrower Defense to Repayment regulations.
10 As an owner of all or part of eight
11 cosmetology schools located in Oklahoma, Texas,
12 Colorado, Virginia, Maryland, and Florida, which employ
13 over 200 people and educate about 1200 students each
14 year, I am deeply concerned with the aspects of both
15 sets of regulations. Because of that, I'm grateful that
16 the Department is considering a new round of negotiating
17 rulemaking on these two regulations and hope that my
18 concerns can be considered during the process.
19 With respect to the Gainful Employment
20 rule, I recently went through the alternative --
21 alternate earning appeals process after receiving zone
22 in four of my schools. This whole process was
23 frustrating for me because I knew that we provide our
24 students with a quality educational experience and that
25 they have excellent career outcomes. I knew that we




Download 5.96 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   ...   29




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page