Effects of technology



Download 242.27 Kb.
Page11/16
Date01.10.2023
Size242.27 Kb.
#62211
1   ...   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16
Effects of Technology in the Level of Pe
Strand

Population

Sample

SHS11-GAS1A

37

13

SHS11-ABM1A

53

19

SHS11-TO1A

40

15

SHS11-CA1A

47

17

SHS11-IT1A

46

17

SHS11-IT1B

49

17

SHS12-TO21A

41

15

SHS12-RBO21A

30

11

SHS12-CA21A

39

14

SHS12-CA21B

28

10

SHS12-ICT21A

53

19

SHS12-ICT21B

53

19

SHS12-ICT21C

53

19

SHS12-ABM21A

46

17

SHS12-ABM21B

48

17

SHS12-GAS21A

46

17

Total

709

256

In order to distribute this sample size evenly per Strand, the population size of the year level was divided by the total population. Table 2 presents the population of every course and its estimated sample size.
Description of the Instruments
The instrument used was made by the researcher and validated by the instructor entitled “Effects of Technology on the Level of Performance of SHS” is composed of 20 negative questions that will determine on how the technology may affect the academic performance of the Senior High School students.


Reliability and Validity of the Instrument
The designed questionnaire was submitted to the instructor or project supervisor for approval before distributing it to the respondents.
The scores of the Senior High School Students in the tests were correlated using Pearson r product moment correlation formula.
The obtained values were significant.
The following response mode was used.

Table 3

Equivalent scale for Verbal Description



Scale

Verbal description

1

Never

2

Rarely

3

Occasionally

4

Often

5

Always







A high score represents that technology highly affects the student’s level of performance.
Procedure of Analysis


Table 4

Equivalent Mean Range for Verbal Description of Effects of Technology



Scale

Verbal description

Equivalent Mean Range

1

Never

1.00 – 1.79

2

Rarely

1.80 – 2.59

3

Occasionally

2.60 – 3.39

4

Often

3.40 – 4.19

5

Always

4.20 – 5.00

The survey questionnaire utilized the rating scale as a means of identifying how the given statements closely described the effects of technology to the student’s performance. The rating scale ranges from 1-5, and described above.




Table 5
Scale for Student’s Grade

Limits

Level

90 and above

Excellent

85-89

Above Average

80-84

Average

75-79

Fair

74 and below

Poor

The level of performance of grade 11 and grade 12 students was classified based on their achievement grade using the following arbitrary scale. The frequency count and percentage distribution of SHS students belonging to each level was determined.




Data Gathering Procedure

Researchers ask for permission from each instructor of the time we conducted the survey. Upon approval, questionnaire was given to the respondents.
The average grade of Grade 11 and Grade 12 students which served as the measure to academic performance of the students of STI College Meycauayan for the school year 2017-2018, was collected from the instructor upon the approval of the Principal in agreement that the student’s name will not be included in the grade.




Treatment of Data


With the use of both descriptive and inferential statistics, the researcher analyzed, interpreted the collected data and the implications were determined.


To facilitate the tabulation and tallying of the data gathered, the researchers made use of the Microsoft Excel 2010.
Frequency distribution was used to measure the number of responses and its magnitude with the sample for the students’ perception of effects of technology. Also, the study made use of the mean, standard deviation, and ranking to describe the perception of the respondents in the effects of technology.
The mean is expressed through the following formula:

X
X̅ =
n


Where:
X̅ = mean
ΣX = sum of all data value
n = number of data items in the sample

The standard deviation is expressed through the following formula:







To determine the relationship between effects of technology and student’s academic performance, Bivariate Correlation Analysis with the Pearson –Product Correlation was used. The Pearson-Product Moment Correlation Coefficient is expressed through the following formula

Table 6

Correlation Scale and Interpretations



Value of r

Interpretations

Between ± .80 to ± .99

High correlation

Between ± .60 to ± .79

Moderately high correlation

Between ± .40 to ± .59

Moderate correlation

Between ± .20 to ± .39

Low correlation

Between ± .01 to ± .19

Negligible correlation

In analyzing the correlation of the effects of technology and academic performance of the students, this study made use of the correlation scale that indicated the interpretation on the correlation based on the value of r obtained.


Table 7
P-value Scale

P-value

Interpretations

> 0.05

Not Significant

< 0.05

Significant

The p-value for each term tests the null hypothesis that the coefficient is equal to zero (no effect). A p-value with (< 0.05) indicates that there is significant relationship. On other hand, p-value with (> 0.05) indicates that there is no significant relationship, therefore we can accept the null hypothesis that “There is no significant relationship between effects of technology and student’s academic performance.





Chapter 4
Presentation, Analysis, and Interpretation of Data

This chapter presents the interpretation, implications of the data gathered, and studies that support the obtained results. The data are presented in the order according to the specific sub-problems as stated under the statement of the problem.




Presentation, Analysis, and Interpretation of Data

This chapter presents the interpretation, implications of the data gathered, and studies that support the obtained results.





  1. How the technology may affect the student’s academic performance in terms of the following:

The data presented revealed the effects of technology to the Grade 11 and grade 12 senior High students of STI Meycauayan College involved in the study.

    1. Technology in terms of computer .The table below presents the effects of the computer to the student.




Table 8
Mean and Standard Deviation of Each Item of the Test on the Effects of Technology in Terms of Computer





Download 242.27 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page