Technology
|
Academic Performance (Grade)
|
Pearson
Correlation ( r )
|
Sig. (p)
|
Interpretation
|
Correlation Interpretation
|
Computer
|
.085022
|
.0820
|
Not Significant
|
Negligible
Correlation
|
Cellphone
|
.118195
|
.0894
|
Not Significant
|
Negligible Correlation
|
Internet
|
.09137
|
.0774
|
Not Significant
|
Negligible Correlation
|
Overall Score
|
.097222
|
.0808
|
Not Significant
|
Negligible Correlation
|
* Correlation is not significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
The following correlation were revealed as shown in table 12; “Effects of technology in terms of computer”(r = .085022) which interpreted as negligible correlation and has p-value of .0820 which means that there is no significant relationship. Also in the “Effects of computer in terms of cellphone” with Pearson correlation of .118195 and p-value of .0894 and “Effects of technology in terms of Internet” with .097222 Pearson correlation and p-value of .0808. Therefore we should accept the null hypothesis that “There is no significant relationship between using technology and the level of performance of the Senior High School Students in STI College Meycauayan.”
Share with your friends: |