Federal Transit Administration November 4, 2015 Subject: americans with disabilities act (ada): guidance


Chapter 5 – Equivalent Facilitation



Download 1.93 Mb.
Page26/58
Date02.06.2017
Size1.93 Mb.
#19729
1   ...   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   ...   58

5.Chapter 5 – Equivalent Facilitation

5.1Introduction


This chapter discusses the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations covering requests for equivalent facilitation for transportation vehicles and transportation facilities. Equivalent facilitation is the process for requesting permission from FTA to depart from the technical standards in the DOT ADA regulations and to use alternative designs or technologies that provide equal or greater accessibility. It does not represent a mechanism for obtaining a “waiver” from compliance.27

In addition to presenting the requirements for equivalent facilitation, this chapter discusses important considerations for transit agencies and manufacturers considering such requests and includes recommendations for what to do and what not to do based on FTA’s experience.

This Circular does not alter, amend, supersede, or otherwise affect the DOT ADA regulations themselves or replace the need for readers to reference the detailed information in the regulations. FTA recommendations and examples of optional practices are included throughout the Circular and do not represent requirements. FTA recognizes there are many different ways agencies can implement the regulatory requirements and ensure the delivery of compliant service. FTA encourages transit agencies to engage riders with disabilities when making decisions about local transit service.

5.2Important Considerations


Equivalent facilitation is the means by which the DOT ADA regulations accommodate innovation in accessible design. Such innovations must provide equal or greater accessibility in comparison to the specific technical and scoping requirements contained in the regulations (49 CFR Part 38 for vehicles and the ADA Standards for Transportation Facilities (DOT Standards) for facilities). It is important to understand that no such departures from the regulations can be made without a formal determination of equivalent facilitation from the FTA Administrator.

The requirement for an affirmative determination of equivalent facilitation serves two purposes. First, it ensures that any departure from the required standards fulfills the same function to an equal or greater degree. Second, it ensures that the equivalent facilitation provision does not become a mechanism for amending the regulations outside of the Federal rulemaking process.

There are a number of important considerations to take into account when seeking a determination of equivalent facilitation:

The DOT ADA regulations for equivalent facilitation apply only to (1) the acquisition of transportation vehicles and (2) the construction or alteration of transportation facilities.

The DOT ADA regulations for equivalent facilitation differ from those of the Department of Justice (DOJ). Under the DOJ ADA regulations, there is no requirement for an affirmative determination of equivalent facilitation. However, such an entity would be responsible for demonstrating equal or greater accessibility or usability in the event of litigation or a DOJ inquiry. (See Circular Section 5.4.2.)

Under the equivalent facilitation requirements discussed in Circular Sections 5.3 and 5.4 for vehicles and facilities, respectively:

Only the Administrator of the concerned DOT operating administration, with concurrence from the Office of the Secretary of Transportation, can make a determination of equivalent facilitation.

A determination of equivalent facilitation pertains only to the specific situation for which the determination is made.

Since determinations are made on a case-by-case basis, FTA requires each entity to document and submit its own request. Previous determinations are not applicable to subsequent requests, even if the circumstances appear similar.

The Administrator is permitted to make a determination of equivalent facilitation for a class of situations concerning facilities. Such determinations will explicitly state where this is the case.

A determination of equivalent facilitation is not a waiver of a standard. Rather, it is a finding that accessibility or usability are provided to an equal or greater degree in comparison to the required standard.

Because the regulations require a determination of equivalent facilitation in order to depart from the vehicle and facility requirements, FTA strongly cautions against making any decisions or commitments to a vehicle or facility design that departs from the required standards prior to a determination.

A determination of equivalent facilitation is not an endorsement of any product or method by the Federal government and cannot be claimed as such, for example, by a vehicle manufacturer.

Requests for equivalent facilitation must be developed through a public process, including notice and comment and a public hearing.

Equivalent facilitation must not be confused with the “equivalent service” requirements that apply to vehicle acquisition for demand responsive systems. (See Circular Section 7.3.)

5.3Equivalent Facilitation for Transportation Vehicles

5.3.1Part 38 Vehicle Specifications


Equivalent facilitation allows for departures from the vehicle specifications in 49 CFR Part 38 (Accessibility Specifications for Transportation Vehicles). Section 38.2 states, “Departures from particular technical and scoping requirements of [the Part 38] guidelines by use of other designs and technologies are permitted where the alternative designs and technologies used will provide substantially equivalent or greater access to and usability of the vehicle.”

The FTA Administrator makes a determination of equivalent facilitation for transportation vehicles on a case-by-case basis, with concurrence from the Office of the Secretary of Transportation. No departures from the required standards can be made without a determination of equivalent facilitation.


5.3.2Parties Eligible to Submit Requests

Requirement

“(1) For purposes of implementing the equivalent facilitation provision in § 38.2 of this subtitle, the following parties may submit to the Administrator of the applicable operating administration a request for a determination of equivalent facilitation:

(i) A public or private entity that provides transportation services and is subject to the provisions of Subpart D or Subpart E this part; or

(ii) The manufacturer of a vehicle or a vehicle component or subsystem to be used by such entity to comply with this part” (§ 37.7(b)).

Discussion

Section 37.7(b) permits transportation entities (public or private) or the manufacturer of a vehicle or vehicle component or subsystem to request a determination of equivalent facilitation from the FTA Administrator. FTA strongly advises against making any decision or commitment to acquire a vehicle or component that departs from the Part 38 standards without first obtaining a determination of equivalent facilitation.

5.3.3Submission Materials

Requirement

“(2) The requesting party shall provide the following information with its request:

(i) Entity name, address, contact person and telephone;

(ii) Specific provision of Part 38 of this title concerning which the entity is seeking a determination of equivalent facilitation;

(iii) [Reserved]

(iv) Alternative method of compliance, with demonstration of how the alternative meets or exceeds the level of accessibility or usability of the vehicle provided in Part 38 of this subtitle; and

(v) Documentation of the public participation used in developing an alternative method of compliance” (§ 37.7(b)).


Discussion

In order to make a determination of equivalent facilitation, the FTA Administrator must be able to conclude that the alternative method of compliance meets or exceeds the level of accessibility or usability of the vehicle or vehicle component specified in Part 38. A complete and thorough submission will contain sufficient evidence to support the request with hard data demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed solution in providing equal or greater accessibility or usability by individuals with disabilities. FTA expects the request to document the testing of potential problems or failure modes. For example, what are the consequences if an individual using a mobility device deviates from a direct path of travel down a ramp that lacks side barriers? Properly documented requests consider the full spectrum of operating conditions (e.g., the normal range of vehicle loading conditions) and weather when relevant.

FTA encourages entities to submit additional materials to facilitate review. This can include detailed information such as drawings, data, photographs, and videos. In prior reviews of requests for a determination of equivalent facilitation, FTA has found the use of photographs and videos of the testing process to be particularly valuable forms of documentation.

FTA requires each entity to present data specific to its request for equivalent facilitation. Reliance on another transit agency’s equivalent facilitation data is not acceptable, regardless of any apparent similarities.

FTA requires submissions to be addressed to the FTA Administrator and requests a copy to be sent to the FTA Office of Civil Rights.


5.3.4Public Participation

Requirement

“(3) In the case of a request by a public entity that provides transportation services subject to the provisions of Subpart D of this part, the required public participation shall include the following:

(i) The entity shall contact individuals with disabilities and groups representing them in the community. Consultation with these individuals and groups shall take place at all stages of the development of the request for equivalent facilitation. All documents and other information concerning the request shall be available, upon request, to members of the public.

(ii) The entity shall make its proposed request available for public comment before the request is made final or transmitted to DOT. In making the request available for public review, the entity shall ensure that it is available, upon request, in accessible formats.

(iii) The entity shall sponsor at least one public hearing on the request and shall provide adequate notice of the hearing, including advertisement in appropriate media, such as newspapers of general and special interest circulation and radio announcements.

(4) In the case of a request by a private entity that provides transportation services subject to the provisions of Subpart E of this part or a manufacturer, the private entity or manufacturer shall consult, in person, in writing, or by other appropriate means, with representatives of national and local organizations representing people with those disabilities who would be affected by the request” (§ 37.7(b)).

Discussion

For transit agencies pursuing equivalent facilitation, outreach goes beyond simple notification; it is an ongoing activity that provides an opportunity for obtaining direct input from potential users. It is not sufficient to present a fully formed equivalent facilitation request at a public meeting. The documentation of public participation required under § 37.7(b)(2) must include the input received during the public participation process.

Transit agencies are likely familiar with the process of contacting and consulting with individuals with disabilities and groups representing them in the community because they have an existing customer base of riders with disabilities who can provide input. Most agencies also have committees with which they coordinate on disability issues. These committees are often the best place to begin the outreach process, supplemented by contacting any organizations that committee members represent.

The public outreach requirements for manufacturers are different. Because vehicles and components may be used by more than one transit agency, § 37.7(b)(4) requires manufacturers seeking a determination of equivalent facilitation to consult, in person, in writing, or by other appropriate means with representatives of national and local organizations representing individuals with disabilities who would be affected by the request. As with transit agencies, the manufacturer submitting the request must document the steps taken to incorporate the input of those consulted.

Consultation might differ for a manufacturer depending on local conditions. A component may perform differently in locations with snow and ice conditions, for example, and operating practices that affect usability might also vary from place to place. Accordingly, public consultation on such a component would need to involve people who experience this kind of weather and are familiar with local conditions.


5.3.5FTA Determinations

Requirement

“(5) A determination of compliance will be made by the Administrator of the concerned operating administration on a case-by-case basis, with the concurrence of the Assistant Secretary for Policy and International Affairs.

(6) Determinations of equivalent facilitation are made only with respect to vehicles or vehicle components used in the provision of transportation services covered by Subpart D or Subpart E of this part, and pertain only to the specific situation concerning which the determination is made. Entities shall not cite these determinations as indicating that a product or method constitute equivalent facilitations in situations other than those to which the determinations specifically pertain. Entities shall not claim that a determination of equivalent facilitation indicates approval or endorsement of any product or method by the Federal government, the Department of Transportation, or any of its operating administrations” (§ 37.7(b)).


Discussion

The FTA Administrator will make determinations of equivalent facilitation on a case-by-case basis, with the concurrence of the Office of the Secretary of Transportation. Determinations of equivalent facilitation are made in writing under the signature of the Administrator and describe the basis upon which the determination is made. A determination of equivalent facilitation pertains only to the specific situation for which it is made; it is not applicable to other entities or in other situations.


Download 1.93 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   ...   58




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page