Expectations of anytime, anywhere access and mobility
The device choices of schools under the DER initiative demonstrate the value placed on anywhere, anytime access. Of the almost one million devices procured under the initiative, the number of desktops is estimated to be less than 5 per cent. Principals interviewed confirmed that there were two underpinning reasons for the movement away from desktops. The first of these is the lack of physical space to house dedicated computer labs and, secondly, the need for learning to be mobile. Forecasts relating to the growth of mobile devices support the views of principals. In May 2012, a report was released that forecast estimated growth in mobile access globally and in Australia for the period from 2011–16. Highlights from the updated research included projections that by 2016:
There will be nearly 19 billion global network connections (fixed and mobile), the equivalent of 2.5 connections for every person on Earth.
There will be about 3.4 billion Internet users, which is more than 45 per cent of the world’s projected population.
Wi-Fi will account for nearly half of all Internet Protocol (IP) traffic.126
The forecast127 for Australia is equally compelling, with mobile data traffic expected to grow 14-fold between 2011 and 2016, a compound annual growth rate of 68 per cent. Australian mobile data traffic will grow two times faster than Australian fixed IP traffic from 2011 to 2016, and mobile data traffic will account for 16 per cent of Australian fixed and mobile data traffic in 2016, up from 7 per cent in 2011.
The potential impacts these growth rates have on education are quite significant. This includes on the selection of devices for schools, the ongoing investment required in school-based network infrastructure and the demands for pedagogical practices to adapt to a more mobile learning environment. One specific impact is on security, particularly where school-issued educational devices can also be used for social purposes. This complexity is also acknowledged in commerce:
Mobile computing has broken down the barriers between work and personal life. The always-on employee has few options for maintaining segregation between these two worlds. While some opt to carry multiple devices, others use work devices for personal use, or perform work activities on personal devices. Whether accessing public or private networks, using social media applications, or even ’checking in‘ via location-based services, the explosion of these devices has created a myriad of security problems.128
Blurring of the lines between educational and social uses of technology
Technology has long been regarded as an educational and professional tool, but the explosion in Web 2.0 technologies and the growth of social media has challenged the concept of the school-provided device as exclusively educational. Additionally, the evolving nature of social media and the role it plays in people lives is also blurring concepts of education. Students interviewed as part of the review indicated they were more likely to visit YouTube for educational tasks than they were to visit accredited/sanctioned educational sites. The rise of social media is illustrated through statistics such as there being 2.4 billion social networking accounts worldwide, including nearly 800-plus million on a single platform of Facebook.129
Education authorities, schools and education publishers are recognising the potential value of leveraging these social media tools to simultaneously increase the relevance of applications/content and reduce their cost. The education publisher Pearson and search engine Google are blending traditional learning management systems and social networking platforms. Their platform, OpenClass, allows teachers to import material from a vast range of online sources, and features a Facebook-style newsfeed stream of comments and activities to encourage socialisation together with learning.130
Pedagogy is also reflecting the blurring of social media and traditional education content. The evolution of blended learning acknowledges that informal information gathering tends to happen outside the classroom using digital resources, while more formal application or construction of this knowledge is the focus inside the classroom. The Collective Knowledge Construction research paper identifies a range of strategies by which knowledge is gathered and disseminated in online learning. It breaks down the different possibilities of communicating when teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. These range from relatively simple connections between students and teachers through to dynamic exchanges that are less predictable but potentially more valuable.131 As indicated in Figure 4 -9, the paper identifies four types of ‘knowledge construction’ that exist in contemporary pedagogy and which are driven by both digital education technology generally and the power of Web 2.0 technologies specifically. Stakeholders indicated that teachers have established networks on social media (e.g., on Facebook) to share resources and experience relating to ICT, digital resources and their application.
Figure 4‑9: Framework for knowledge construction models
Source: ideasLAB
Increased use of collaboration technologies to enable sharing
The rise in demand for and creation of video content is significant; particularly considering the fact that 48 hours of video is uploaded onto YouTube every minute. It is estimated that 201 billion videos were viewed on the Internet in the month of October 2011 alone, and more than 88 billion of those were as a result of Google and its affiliates (such as YouTube). The use of video in education is increasing exponentially, via both dedicated education channels and open-access channels such as YouTube. The rise of video is significant from a learning perspective on a number of fronts:
It challenges long-standing school access policies that attempt to restrict admission to open-access channels in particular and video in general (particularly in schools where bandwidth is limited and expensive).
It places significant additional demands on school-based infrastructure – including networks, storage and devices – to keep pace with the volume of traffic, quality of service requirements (particularly if the video is two-way and synchronous) and requirements for additional security.
It increases the demand for safe, accessible and accredited education sites, including sites that enable uploading of video as part of ePortfolios, and challenges education authorities to connect rich media content repositories to the core curriculum.
While the DER has created significant additional online learning resources, teachers often generate their own or access publicly available content. Content is accessed from a range of sources including corporate sites, dedicated sites (such as that operated by the US Center for Interactive Learning and Collaboration132 to facilitate videoconferencing and school exchanges), community-based sites such as the Powerhouse Museum in NSW133, commercial providers such as education publisher Pearson, and proprietary school repositories operated by major technology vendors. In this way, it is suggested that the availability of content is not an issue, but significant work is required to help teachers and students navigate and ascertain the quality of available resources, and to gain easy access to them.
Share with your friends: |