66 66
Materiality measure
Group
Significant judgements made by auditor
in determining the materialityIn determining materiality, we made the following significant judgements Total income was considered the most appropriate benchmark given the Council’s focus on vision (ie member retention) and value (ie
progression of exam entries, percentage of affiliates achieving membership within four years. The more recent shift to the focus of non-core deliverables (diplomas, etc) and marketing/training programmes was also a significant judgement considered when selecting income as the most appropriate benchmark. After reviewing industry competitors benchmarks and the risk associated with the audit, we have determined 1.75% of total income to bean appropriate benchmark.
Materiality for the current year is higher than the level that we determined for the year ended 31 March 2021 to reflect review of competitors benchmarks.
Share with your friends: