County
|
County
|
|
County
|
County
|
|
County
|
County
|
Code
|
Name
|
|
Code
|
Name
|
|
Code
|
Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
001
|
Alachua
|
|
049
|
Hardee
|
|
093
|
Okeechobee
|
003
|
Baker
|
|
051
|
Hendry
|
|
095
|
Orange
|
005
|
Bay
|
|
053
|
Hernando
|
|
097
|
Osceola
|
007
|
Bradford
|
|
055
|
Highlands
|
|
099
|
Palm Beach
|
009
|
Brevard
|
|
057
|
Hillsborough
|
|
101
|
Pasco
|
011
|
Broward
|
|
059
|
Holmes
|
|
103
|
Pinellas
|
013
|
Calhoun
|
|
061
|
Indian River
|
|
105
|
Polk
|
015
|
Charlotte
|
|
063
|
Jackson
|
|
107
|
Putnam
|
017
|
Citrus
|
|
065
|
Jefferson
|
|
109
|
St. Johns
|
019
|
Clay
|
|
067
|
Lafayette
|
|
111
|
St. Lucie
|
021
|
Collier
|
|
069
|
Lake
|
|
113
|
Santa Rosa
|
023
|
Columbia
|
|
071
|
Lee
|
|
115
|
Sarasota
|
027
|
De Soto
|
|
073
|
Leon
|
|
117
|
Seminole
|
029
|
Dixie
|
|
075
|
Levy
|
|
119
|
Sumter
|
031
|
Duval
|
|
077
|
Liberty
|
|
121
|
Suwannee
|
033
|
Escambia
|
|
079
|
Madison
|
|
123
|
Taylor
|
035
|
Flagler
|
|
081
|
Manatee
|
|
125
|
Union
|
037
|
Franklin
|
|
083
|
Marion
|
|
127
|
Volusia
|
039
|
Gadsden
|
|
085
|
Martin
|
|
129
|
Wakulla
|
041
|
Gilchrist
|
|
086
|
Miami-Dade
|
|
131
|
Walton
|
043
|
Glades
|
|
087
|
Monroe
|
|
133
|
Washington
|
045
|
Gulf
|
|
089
|
Nassau
|
|
|
|
047
|
Hamilton
|
|
091
|
Okaloosa
|
|
|
|
Note: These codes are derived from the Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) Codes.
Figure 2
State of Florida
By County
Comparison of 2015 Standards to 2013 Standards
Standard
|
Title
|
Comments
|
|
|
|
General
|
G-1
|
Scope of the Model and Its Implementation
|
Significant Revision
|
G-2
|
Qualifications of Modeling Organization Personnel and Consultants Engaged in Development of the Model
|
|
G-3
|
Insured Exposure Location
|
|
G-4
|
Independence of Model Components
|
|
G-5
|
Editorial Compliance
|
|
|
|
|
Meteorological
|
M-1
|
Base Hurricane Storm Set
|
Significant Revision
|
M-2
|
Hurricane Parameters and Characteristics
|
|
M-3
|
Hurricane Probabilities
|
|
M-4
|
Hurricane Windfield Structure
|
Significant Revision
|
M-5
|
Landfall and Over-Land Weakening Methodologies
|
|
M-6
|
Logical Relationships of Hurricane Characteristics
|
|
|
|
|
Statistical
|
S-1
|
Modeled Results and Goodness-of-Fit
|
|
S-2
|
Sensitivity Analysis for Model Output
|
|
S-3
|
Uncertainty Analysis for Model Output
|
|
S-4
|
County Level Aggregation
|
|
S-5
|
Replication of Known Hurricane Losses
|
|
S-6
|
Comparison of Projected Hurricane Loss Costs
|
|
|
|
|
Vulnerability
|
V-1
|
Derivation of Building Vulnerability Functions
|
Significant Revision
|
V-2
|
Derivation of Contents and Time Element Vulnerability Functions
|
|
V-3
|
Mitigation Measures
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial
|
A-1
|
Modeling Input Data and Output Reports
|
|
A-2
|
Event Definition
|
|
A-3
|
Coverages
|
|
A-4
|
Modeled Loss Cost and Probable Maximum Loss Considerations
|
|
A-5
|
Policy Conditions
|
|
A-6
|
Loss Outputs and Logical Relationships to Risk
|
|
|
|
|
Computer/Information
|
CI-1
|
Documentation
|
|
CI-2
|
Requirements
|
|
CI-3
|
Model Architecture and Component Design
|
|
CI-4
|
Implementation
|
Significant Revision
|
CI-5
|
Verification
|
|
CI-6
|
Model Maintenance and Revision
|
|
CI-7
|
Security
|
|
Note: The Commission has determined that “significant revisions” are those that result in or have potential for changes to loss costs or probable maximum loss levels. The Commission may determine, in its judgment, whether a revision is significant.
GENERAL STANDARDS
G-1 Scope of the Model and Its Implementation*
(*Significant Revision)
-
The model shall project loss costs and probable maximum loss levels for damage to insured residential property from hurricane events.
-
The modeling organization shall maintain a documented process to assure continual agreement and correct correspondence of databases, data files, and computer source code to slides, technical papers, and modeling organization documents.
-
All software and data (1) located within the model, (2) used to validate the model, (3) used to project modeled loss costs and probable maximum loss levels, and (4) used to create forms required by the Commission in the Report of Activities shall fall within the scope of the Computer/Information Standards and shall be located in centralized, model-level file areas.
Purpose: This standard gives a high level view of the scope of the model to be reviewed, namely projecting loss costs and probable maximum loss levels for damage to insured residential property (personal and commercial) from hurricane events, including time element losses.
Relevant Form: G-1, General Standards Expert Certification
Disclosures
-
Specify the model version identification. If the model submitted for review is implemented on more than one platform, specify each model platform. Specify which platform is the primary platform and verify how any other platforms produce the same model output results or are otherwise functionally equivalent as provided for in the “Process for Determining the Acceptability of a Computer Simulation Model” in VI. Review by the Commission, I. Review and Acceptance Criteria for Functionally Equivalent Model Platforms.
-
Provide a comprehensive summary of the model. This summary should include a technical description of the model, including each major component of the model used to project loss costs and probable maximum loss levels for damage to insured residential property from hurricane events causing damage in Florida. Describe the theoretical basis of the model and include a description of the methodology, particularly the wind components, the vulnerability components, and the insured loss components used in the model. The description should be complete and must not reference unpublished work.
-
Provide a flowchart that illustrates interactions among major model components.
-
Provide a comprehensive list of complete references pertinent to the model by standard grouping using professional citation standards.
-
Provide the following information related to changes in the model from the previously accepted model to the initial submission this year.
-
Model changes:
-
A summary description of changes that affect the personal or commercial residential loss costs or probable maximum loss levels,
-
A list of all other changes, and
-
The rationale for each change.
-
Percentage difference in average annual zero deductible statewide loss costs based on the 2012 Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund’s aggregate personal and commercial residential exposure data found in the file named “hlpm2012c.exe” for:
-
All changes combined, and
-
Each individual model component change.
C. Color-coded maps by county reflecting the percentage difference in average annual zero deductible statewide loss costs based on the 2012 Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund’s aggregate personal and commercial residential exposure data found in the file named “hlpm2012c.exe” for each model component change.
D. Color-coded map by county reflecting the percentage difference in average annual zero deductible statewide loss costs based on the 2012 Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund’s aggregate personal and commercial residential exposure data found in the file named “hlpm2012c.exe” for all model components changed.
-
Provide a list and description of any potential interim updates to underlying data relied upon by the model. State whether the time interval for the update has a possibility of occurring during the period of time the model could be found acceptable by the Commission under the review cycle in this Report of Activities.
Audit
1. All representative or primary technical papers that describe the underlying model theory and implementation (where applicable) should be available for review in hard copy or electronic form. Modeling organization specific publications cited must be available for review in hard copy or electronic form.
2. Compliance with the process prescribed in Standard G-1.B in all stages of the modeling process will be reviewed.
-
Items specified in Standard G-1.C will be reviewed as part of the Computer/ Information Standards.
-
Maps, databases, and data files relevant to the modeling organization’s submission will be reviewed.
-
The following information related to changes in the model, since the initial submission for each subsequent revision of the submission, will be reviewed.
-
Model changes:
-
A summary description of changes that affect, or are believed to affect, the personal or commercial residential loss costs or probable maximum loss levels,
-
A list of all other changes, and
-
The rationale for each change.
-
Percentage difference in average annual zero deductible statewide loss costs based on the 2012 Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund’s aggregate personal and commercial residential exposure data found in the file named “hlpm2012c.exe” for:
-
All changes combined, and
-
Each individual model component and subcomponent change.
-
For any modifications to Form A-4, Output Ranges, since the initial submission, additional versions of Form A-5, Percentage Change in Output Ranges:
1. With the initial submission as the baseline for computing the percentage changes, and
2. With any intermediate revisions as the baseline for computing the percentage changes.
-
Color-coded maps by county reflecting the percentage difference in average annual zero deductible statewide loss costs based on the 2012 Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund’s aggregate personal and commercial residential exposure data found in the file named “hlpm2012c.exe” for each model component change:
-
Between the previously accepted model and the revised model,
-
Between the initial submission and the revised submission, and
-
Between any intermediate revisions and the revised submission.
Share with your friends: |