Fuzhou World Bank Financed Projects Nanjiang Binlu, Phase-ii project of the Third Ring Road and Kuiqi Bridge environmental impact report


First public participation survey on the Kuiqi Bridge project



Download 3.93 Mb.
Page40/48
Date13.07.2017
Size3.93 Mb.
#23223
1   ...   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   ...   48

11.5 First public participation survey on the Kuiqi Bridge project

11.5.1 First public participation survey


Scope of survey: the scope of public opinion survey covers relevant areas under the environmental impact caused by pollutants during the construction period and operation of the Kuiqi Bridge Project and the key range is the residents at north and south of the bridge, including the villagers committee in the affected region. About 40 copies of questionnaires are distributed.

Objection of survey: including the residents affected and relevant government officials at various levels.

Method of survey: questionnaires in writing

Content of survey: site survey among masses for public feeling and attitude towards the Project; filling up the public opinion questionnaire and statistics of the main opinions of the public; put forward the resolution for some major questions with the public opinions fully taken into consideration.


11.5.1.1 Statistics and analysis of public opinion survey results


There are 45 copies of questionnaires distributed with 40 effective copies returned. The statistics of outcome of the questionnaires for the public participation survey are shown in Table 11.5-1.

Table 11.5-1 Questionnaires for Public Participation Survey of Kuiqi Bridge Project



Project Profile

The Kuiqi Bridge, which spans the Minjiang River, is a bridge planned to connect the Nantaidao Island to the downtown area of Fuzhou City. It is a critical component of the 3rd Ring Road of Fuzhou City. The location of the bridge is selected at Kuiqi Village.

The project starts from south of the Kuiqi Bridge, overspaning the Nanjiang Binlu and equal to Pile No. k11+610 of the 3rd Ring Road(Phase II) Project; it ends at the interconnected flyover where the north of the bridge, the North Jiangbin Road and the expressway (Phase II) of planned Changle International Airport are met.



Class of the interviewees

Resident

School

Hospital

The 3rd Industry

Farmer

Enterprises and Institutions

Local Environmental Protection Authority

Others













36

3




1

Question 1: Do you agree with construction of the Kuiqi Bridge?

Agree

Disagree

Objection

95%

5%




Question 2: How about the integral social benefit to be brought by the Kuiqi Bridge after it is put into use?

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

17.5%

65%

17.5%







Question 3: Upon completion of the Kuiqi Bridge Project, what do you think the environmental quality in your area will turn to?

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

2.5%

57.5%

40%







Question 4: Will construction of the Kuiqi Bridge bring any negative environmental impact?

Impact on surrounding sceneries

Disturbance to residents due to traffic noise

Impact due to exhaust and dust

Impact on water body by wastewater from the bridge

Other factors

12.5%

100%

67.5%

25%




Question 5: What is the most urgent environmental issue in the local area do you think at present?

Noise

Waste gases

Dust

Others

30%

5%

52.5%




Question 6: upon completion of Kuiqi Bridge project and after it is put into use, what is the most urgent environmental issue in the local area as per your estimation?

Noise

Waste gases

Dust

Others

100%

12.5%

30%




Do you have any suggestion on preventive measures against the environmental impact during construction of Kuiqi Bridge and after completion of it: See Table 2-2



11.5.1.2 Analysis of the public opinions


(1) Information and support to the Project

Do you know about the Project? 40 persons have answered this question, with 38 of them answered “Yes”, which takes 95% of the interviewees, and 2 answered “No”, which takes 5%.

Do you know following information of the Project? 30 persons know location of the bridge at both the south and north together with its strike, which takes 75% of the interviewees.

Do you agree with construction of the Kuiqi Bridge? 38 answered “Agree”, which takes 95% of the interviewees; 2 answered “Disagree”, which takes 5%.



(2) Integral social benefit by introduction of the Project

How about the integral social benefit to be brought by the Kuiqi Bridge after it is put into use? 7 answered “Excellent”, which takes 17.5% of the total interviewees; 26 answered “Good”, which takes 65%; 7 answered “Average”, which takes 17.5%.

Viewing from the outcome of survey, most of the interviewees think that construction of the Kuiqi Bridge will help actively to improve the overall economic benefit to the region.

(3) Environmental impact

Upon completion of the Kuiqi Bridge Project, what do you think the environmental quality in your area will turn to? 1 person answered "Excellent”, which takes 2.5% of the total interviewees; 23 answered “Good”, which takes 57.5%; 16 answered “Average”, which takes 40%.

Will construction of the Kuiqi Bridge bring any negative environmental impact? 5 answered “Impact on surrounding sceneries”, which takes 12.5% of the total interviewees; 40 answered “Disturbance to residents due to traffic noise”, which takes 100% of the total interviewees; 27 answered “Impact due to exhaust and dust”, which takes 67.5%; 10 answered “Impact on water body by wastewater from the bridge”, which takes 25%.

What is the most urgent environmental issue in the local area do you think at present? 12 answered “Noise”, which takes 30% of the total interviewees; 2 answered “Waste gases”, which takes 5%; 21 answered “Dust”, which takes 52.5%.

Upon completion of Kuiqi Bridge project and after it is put into use, what is the most urgent environmental issue in the local area as per your estimation? 40 answered “Noise”, which takes 100% of the total interviewees; 5 answered “Waste gases”, which takes 12.5%; 12 answered “Dust”, which takes 30%.

Viewing from the above statistics, most of the interviewees think that construction of the Kuiqi Bridge will bring impact upon the surrounding environmental quality, and 100% of interviewees think that the major impact is that on the quality of noise environment.


11.5.2 Second public participation survey

11.5.2.1 Public opinions on main sensitive points


The second public participation survey was held on Nov. 18, 2004 The interviewers have visited the villagers, villagers committees and relevant enterprises in Linpu Village, Shaoqi Village and Kuiqi Village. Detailed opinions collected please see Table 11.5-2.

Table 11.5-2 Public Opinions on Main Sensitive Points



S/No.

Description

Public Opinions

Remarks

1

Linpu Village and Shaoqi Village

① Linpu has many historic culture relics, such as the Ancient Emplacements, Linpu college and Temple of Song Emperor, which needs careful protection;

② At the bridge location, there are three lime factories and residents who require compensation for demolition and resettlement for areas suitable for factories of this kind. Moreover, a few chicken, duck and cattle farms also put forward the similar issues and villagers wish that the government could take their practicalities into consideration and offer them proper location to feed poultries and livestock, so that their living standards will not be degraded;

③ Linpu waterworks is a plant that produces 4,000 ton tap water per day. Its water intertake lies by side of the bridge, where is awfully affected by the construction and operation. Therefore, the waterworks require economic compensation because more water purification agent would be required as the river becomes muddy during the construction period;

④ About 3,000 m2 of the new workshop of Changhui Construction Steel structure Factory will be demolished while the Changfa Sand Chair Factory will also be demolished. Consequently, they claim that the route should be shifted closer to the mountain.



Interviewees are resettlers, local villagers, managers of waterworks and enterprisers related with the Kuiqi Bridge Project



2

Kuiqi Village

① Make the route towards border of the village as much as possible so that less houses will be demolished;

② Use the Jiufu road as the bridge approach;

③ During the period of construction, the dust pollution should be controlled.


Interviewees are the villagers, village cadres and merchants.


11.5.2.2 Analysis of Public Opinions


(1) Opinions For construction of the Project

The mass public support construction of the project, considering that the construction of Kuiqi Bridge has a positive significance for development of regional economies while it facilitates the travel of local people as well. Presently, the local people come and go across the Minjiang River mainly by the small powerboat, which has low safety coefficient, especially in the flood season when there exists hidden safety hazards. Meanwhile, construction of the Project will add value to the land at both ends of the bridge and the convenient transportation can attract large amount of investments, which will propel development of the regional economies and the labour market.

(2) Issues worried by the interviewees

Interviewees within the range of demolition have concerns upon following issues:

1) Compensation after demolition. The interviewees universally worry that after the present houses are demolished, the compensation paid is not enough to buy new houses while their own economic status can hardly offer the high house-purchasing fee and pay the property management fee. In addition, they worry that whether the compensation committed by the government can be delivered to resettlers on time and in full. Therefore, they ask for direct contact with the government department in charge of demolition and resettlement to negotiate about the compensation.

2) The living after demolition. The formers who lose their land worry about their source of income, fearing that if they are resettled far away from their original places and they can not continue the farming they are presently engaged, and thus they are afraid that the living standard will drop. Especially the villagers of Linpu Village near the Bridge site, who are engaging in poultries and livestock currently, fear that once their farms are expropriated, they will lose their means of making a living.

3) Cadres and villagers of Kuiqi Village worry that the Kuiqi Bridge traversing the village will re-divide the village that is already considerable scattered at present, and thus the village will lose its integration while villagers’ daily lives and management will become less convenient.

4) Enterprisers in Linpu village are afraid that the newly built workshops have to be relocated as the Kuiqi Bridge crosses their workshops, which will affect the production and economic benefit of the enterprises.

5) Managers of the waterworks of Linpu Village worry that the construction of Kuiqi Bridge will degrade the water quality of the water intake, which will affect the quality of water consumed daily by the villagers of Linpu village and increase the operating cost of the waterworks.

11.5.3 Brief summary on public participation opinions


1) Most of the interviewees support the Kuiqi Bridge construction Project;

2) Issues put forward by the interviewees and proposed to take into consideration during planning and design of the Bridge include:

① When encountering the villages, the route shall roundabout the village as much as possible in order to occupy less farm land and demolish fewer houses while the village can be protected from being divided with less inconvenience will occur to daily lives of local people;

② It is suggested to avoid the historic sites and swamped land during planning;

3) Issues put forward by the interviewees and proposed to take into consideration during road construction include:

The construction site shall be reasonably arranged, with the concrete mixer, bitumen cooking facilities far away from the residential place; the turbidity of water inside the Minjiang River will increase due to construction of the bridge, which will cause increase of the operational cost of the Linpu Village Waterworks because of additional dose of chemicals, therefore, appropriate economic compensation by the Employer is suggested.

4) Issues put forward by the interviewees and proposed to take into consideration during demolition and resettlement include:

① The compensation for demolition shall be reasonable and direct negotiation on demolition between the Employer and resettlers is expected. Meanwhile, the compensation for demolition shall be directly paid to the resettlers;

② It is suggested to take into consideration the living habits and living demands of those resettlers and give them equal area of land for building their house independently;

③ It is suggested to give appropriate compensation to farmers who lost the land so that they can maintain the current living level, which has active meaning for social stability.

Public participation by the Church


Time

Attendants

Venue

Contents

Morning on June 11, 2002

Wang Gengxian, Lin Yun

Telephone contact

Discussion on resettlement of the priest building of the church.

Afternoon on June 22, 2002

Wang Gengxian,

The World Bank office

Father Wang thinks that it is possible to resettle the priest building.

Morning on July 14, 2002

Wang Gengxian, Lin Yun

Ge Jie, Wu Xiaole, Ruan Bizhen



Church

Issues discussed: ① possibility to keep the square in front of the main church; ② taking back the land occupied by the ship yard by side of the church via help of the municipal government.

Morning on August 02, 2002

Wang Gengxian, Wu Xiaole

Fuzhou Restaurant

Public participation meeting on environmental evaluation and resettlement of the World Bank financed project.

Environmental evaluation part: noise impact on the church by construction and traffic is informed; status of vehicle exhaust and protection of cultural relics.



Afternoon on August 18, 2002

Wang Gengxian, Wu Xiaole, Ge Jie, Liu Zhefu, Lin Yun

Church

The church agrees the priest to keep the square as per the resettlement requirement and agrees with the proposal for protection of cultural relics.

Afternoon on October 25, 2002

Wang Gengxian, Father Xu, Liu Zhefu , Ge Jie, Lin Yun

Church

The engineering proposal, the environmental impact and the proposal for protection of cultural relics are discussed.




Download 3.93 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   ...   48




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page