3. Ensure full accountability for aLL human rights violations committed by security forces
International human rights law requires that all allegations of excessive use of force leading to injuries and loss of life are promptly, impartially and independently investigated, that victims have access to an effective remedy and receive reparation, and that those responsible are brought to justice.45 As noted by the UN Special Rapporteur on extra-judicial, summary or arbitrary executions, “the failure of the State to properly investigate cases of death following the use of force is a violation of the right to life itself.”46 The African Commission has also stressed “that accountability and the oversight mechanisms for policing forms the core of democratic governance and is crucial to enhancing rule of law and assisting in restoring public confidence in the security forces; to develop a culture of human rights, integrity and transparency within the security forces; and to promote a good working relationship between the police, the gendarmerie and the public at large.”47
The Basic Principles sets out key principles of reporting procedures and accountability, in particular that arbitrary or abusive use of force and firearms by law enforcement officials must be punished as a criminal offence. But Guinea has failed to implement some of the Basic Principles relating to accountability. For instance, the provisions of the Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code are insufficient to cover instances of arbitrary and excessive use of force by members of the security forces and the failure of their hierarchy to prevent such instances from occurring when they had an opportunity to do so.48 The reporting requirements set out in the Law on Maintaining Public Order are weak and limited to use of firearms49, when they should be extended to any use of force leading to injury or death. There are also no independent oversight mechanisms for law enforcement agencies.
This lack of accountability for human rights violations committed by security forces in the context of demonstrations is not new. There are striking examples in Guinea’s recent history where accountability has been limited with regards to large-scale violations including, the killing of 135 protestors calling for the departure of former President Lansana Conté in January and February 2007;50 the stadium massacre in Conakry in 28 September 2009 when security forces, including the military, opened fire on opposition protestors killing over 150 people and injuring at least 1,500;51 and the killing of at least nine people and wounding of 40 others during opposition protests ahead of the 2013 legislative elections. 52
While there has been some progress towards prosecuting those suspected of being responsible for the events of 28 September 2009 to justice, most recently with the indictment after almost six years of the relevant senior leaders,53 the majority of human rights violations committed in the context of demonstrations, including the cases identified in this report, have not been adequately investigated and none of the suspected perpetrators brought to justice. In a report published in February 2015, the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights concluded that the efforts to put an end to impunity in Guinea were “very limited” noting that “an important number of human rights violations involving officers of the army and gendarmerie remain unpunished.”54
Recommended actions before the elections:
Amnesty International calls upon Guinean authorities to take the following urgent actions:
-
Take immediate steps to ensure thorough and impartial investigations on the violations reported in this briefing and, if there is sufficient admissible evidence, prosecute those responsible in trials which comply with international fair trial standards;
-
Send a clear circular to the security forces reminding them that human rights violations in the context of operations to maintain public order, including excessive use of force, torture and other ill-treatment will not be tolerated and will be treated as criminal offences.
Recommended actions for the future government
Amnesty International also calls upon the future Guinean government to revise Guinean laws on law enforcement to ensure that they meet the accountability requirements set out in international law and standards, specifically in the UN Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials, including by:
-
Ensuring that arbitrary or abusive use of force and firearms by law enforcement officials is punished as a criminal offence. Commanding officers should be held responsible if they failed to prevent the arbitrary or abusive use of force when they had an opportunity to do so. The law should clarify that orders may not serve as an acceptable defence;
-
Ensuring that any use of force by law enforcement officials be reported and subject to review. Where such review indicates that there may have been excessive use of force, or if there are such allegations, there must be a prompt, independent and impartial investigation. If the investigation finds that there has been excessive use of force, those responsible must be subject to criminal and disciplinary proceedings as appropriate;
Establishing an independent and adequately resourced law enforcement oversight mechanism to review regulations and practices within law enforcement agencies. It should have powers to conduct its own investigations and, based on its findings, to issue recommendations for prosecutions, disciplinary sanctions and reparation. The mechanism should be easily and directly accessible to those wishing to make a complaint and should provide for appropriate witness protection. The mechanism should also be accountable to the legislature and issue regular reports on its performance.
www.amnesty.org
Share with your friends: |