Index Table of Contents



Download 0.64 Mb.
Page6/18
Date02.02.2018
Size0.64 Mb.
#39185
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   18

Econ - Linked




Economies are linked. We will succeed and fail together


Lee & Wilson 12 - Associate Director @ North American Center for Transborder Studies (NACTS), Arizona State University & Associate @ Mexico Institute of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars [Erik Lee & Christopher E. Wilson, “The State of Trade, Competitiveness and Economic Well-being in the U.S.-Mexico Border Region,” Working Paper Series on the State of the U.S.-Mexico Border, June 2012
The quantity of U.S.-Mexico trade is impressive, but its quality makes it unique. The United States and Mexico do not just sell goods to one another, they actually work together to manufacture them. Through a process known as production sharing, materials and parts often cross back and forth between factories on each side of the border as a final product is made and assembled. As a result, U.S. imports from Mexico contain, on average, 40 percent U.S. content, and Mexico’s imports from the U.S. also have a high level of Mexican content. 5

This system of joint production has two important consequences. First, it means that our economies are profoundly linked. We tend to experience growth and recession together, and productivity gains or losses on one side of the border generally cause a corresponding gain or loss in competitiveness on the other side as well. In sum, we will largely succeed or fail together and must therefore join forces to increase the competitiveness of the region. Second, the fact that goods often cross the border several times as they are being produced creates a multiplier effect for gains and losses in border efficiency. Whereas goods from China only go through customs and inspection once as they enter the U.S. or Mexico, products built by regional manufacturers bear the costs of long and unpredictable border wait times and significant customs requirements each time they cross the U.S.-Mexico border. Pg. 5

Close economic ties


Lee & Wilson 12 - Associate Director @ North American Center for Transborder Studies (NACTS), Arizona State University & Associate @ Mexico Institute of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars [Erik Lee & Christopher E. Wilson, “The State of Trade, Competitiveness and Economic Well-being in the U.S.-Mexico Border Region,” Working Paper Series on the State of the U.S.-Mexico Border, June 2012
The six Mexican and four U.S. border states have especially close bilateral economic ties, but what is often unappreciated is that this economic value extends far beyond the border region. Mexico, for example, is the top buyer of exports from states as far away as New Hampshire (mostly computers and electronics). In fact, Mexico is the first or second most important export market for twenty-one states from Colorado to Ohio, and twenty U.S. states sell more than a billion dollars’ worth of goods to Mexico each year. The United States in an even more important market for Mexican exports. Seventy-nine percent of Mexican exports are sold to the United States, including products produced in the border region and throughout the country.3 Crude oil, for example, which is mostly produced in Mexico’s Gulf Coast states, is the top single export to the United States, but automobiles and auto-parts, which make up an even greater share of exports when taken together, are mainly made in the center and north of the country.4 pg. 5

Econ - Leadership Impact

Competiveness underwrites US global leadership


Brimley & Stokes 13 - Director of Studies @ Center for a New American Security & Research Associate at CNAS. [Shawn Brimley (Former Director for Strategic Planning on the National Security Staff @ White House) & Jacob Stokes, “Renewing America's Strategic Solvency,” Center for a New American Security, Commentary, 02/12/2013, pg. http://www.cnas.org/node/10044

Some believed it sent the wrong signal to the world. But the president was and is correct to focus on the connection between our domestic strength and our national security. Making progress on fixing domestic issues will have far-reaching strategic effects that will make America stronger and more secure.

Over the last few years, national security leaders have started to explore this connection. Admiral Mike Mullen, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs, has famously declared the national debt the greatest threat to U.S. security. And Hillary Clinton, during her time as secretary of state, gave a series of the speeches on “economic statecraft.” But few have laid out the specific mechanisms that connect domestic vibrancy to American power.

That connection exists on two levels. First, there are the practical effects. A broad range of efforts on education, health care, infrastructure, immigration, energy and tax reform, among other issues, will bolster American competitiveness. Increased competitiveness will fuel shared prosperity and provide the innovation, dynamism and funding that underwrites America’s global role.

For example, without the world’s best scientists and engineers, the United States will slip behind its adversaries in creating and deploying the next generation of defense technologies. Not only will success in these priorities help renew American economic strength, but it will favorably position America to sustain its geopolitical preeminence even as other powers rise.

Renewing U.S. competitiveness cannot be done via isolationism--it requires a global perspective. The United States is in the midst of an energy revolution at home. According to the International Energy Agency, the nation will overtake Saudi Arabia as the world’s leading oil producer around 2017 and will become a net oil exporter by 2030. That trend will affect U.S. foreign policy as much as it does U.S. domestic policy, and the solutions must work together.

Increasing exports and trade can help create good jobs, as the president’s successful effort to double U.S. exports by 2014 has shown. Ninety-five percent of customers globally live outside the United States, according to the International Trade Association. The IMF estimates that 87 percent of worldwide economic growth will take place outside the United States.

Effective tax reform must be shaped for the global competitive environment; the same goes for infrastructure and immigration. Finding a sensible solution to unsustainable long-term debt will determine whether the U.S. dollar will remain the world’s reserve currency. Just because the solutions must come from American cities and not Baghdad, Beijing or Bamako do not make the implications any less international.

Second, solving big problems at home will have a psychological effect, helping to ease doubts about America’s staying power globally. Resolving big issues can reassure our allies and force potential adversaries to think twice about challenging the rules-based global order. The financial crisis and the contraction in the American economy fueled narratives of American decline as much as U.S. troubles in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Finally, the realities of shifting focus towards the home front hardly means isolationism. While the defense budget will go down over the next decade, the U.S. will remain the world’s pre-eminent military power by a large margin. America will retain a capability and a willingness to counter threats and defend its interests where necessary. As the National Intelligence Council wrote in its Global Trends 2030 report, “The potential for an overstretched U.S. facing increased demands is greater than the risk of the U.S. being replaced as the world’s pre-eminent political leader.”



The real threat to American power from budget cuts and inattention will stem from disproportionate cuts to U.S. diplomatic and development tools, arguably among the most cost-effective investments in American statecraft. If anything, the president should make extra efforts to preserve robust funding support for these agencies.

Power starts at home—but it doesn’t necessarily stay there. The rest of the world is watching how America will respond to the great strategic challenge posed by the need for domestic renewal. For that effort will determine the prospects for American power. So foreign policy wonks, listen up!



Download 0.64 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   18




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page