Draft regulation Impact Statement for Underrun Protection a draft statement inviting discussion and comments from parties affected by the proposed heavy commercial vehicle safety initiative January 2007 Report Documentation Page



Download 5.27 Mb.
Page22/50
Date05.05.2018
Size5.27 Mb.
#47808
1   ...   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   ...   50

5. Estimate the effectiveness of the different UP device types;



  • Note the reported effectiveness of devices under studies at various speeds to reduce fatal, serious and minor injuries,

  • Average the effectiveness at various speeds,

  • Both increase and decrease the effectiveness to give a number of alternative scenarios (A,B,C,) for sensitivity analysis,

  • Add an extra scenario to represent energy absorbing UP devices (D).




Scenario A - Low effectiveness




























Rigid UP Effectiveness




























 


























































Fatal injury

speed

20km/h

30km/h

40km/h

50km/h

60km/h

70km/h

100km/h




 

g

 

 

15

20

25

35

50




Front UP (ECE R93) effectiveness

 

 

 

55%

55%

30%

10%

0%




Proportion of front underruns

 

 

 

15%

15%

25%

35%

20%




Weighted average front underrun effectiveness

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25%

Side UP (ECE R73) effectiveness

 

 

 

35%

20%

10%

0%

0%




Proportion of side underruns

 

 

 

25%

45%

25%

5%

0%




Weighted average side underrun effectiveness

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20%

Rear UP (ECE R58) effectiveness

 

 

 

40%

35%

25%

0%

0%




Proportion of rear underruns

 

 

 

45%

40%

10%

5%

0%




Weighted average rear underrun effectiveness

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35%































Serious injury

speed

20km/h

30km/h

40km/h

50km/h

60km/h

70km/h

100km/h




 

g

 

 

15

20

25

35

50




Front UP (ECE R93) effectiveness

 

 

70%

40%

35%

35%

0%

0%




Proportion of front underruns

 

 

5%

30%

45%

10%

0%

0%




Weighted average front underrun effectiveness

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35%

Side UP (ECE R73) effectiveness

 

 

40%

35%

15%

10%

0%

0%




Proportion of side underruns

 

 

20%

50%

30%

0%

0%

0%




Weighted average side underrun effectiveness

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30%

Rear UP (ECE R58) effectiveness

 

 

60%

45%

38%

10%

0%

0%




Proportion of rear underruns

 

 

25%

45%

30%

5%

0%

0%




Weighted average rear underrun effectiveness

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

45%


Download 5.27 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   ...   50




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page