Report 4: Interim Evaluation
(xi)Satisfaction with Park Legacy plans and the consultation process for Park Master Plans
Download 1.96 Mb.
|
- Navigate this page:
- Figure C-37: The extent to which respondents that had heard about – and seen – the plans of the Olympic Park
- Figure C-38: Satisfaction with the plans for the Olympic Park and surrounding area after the Games
(xi)Satisfaction with Park Legacy plans and the consultation process for Park Master PlansJust under half of the respondents (45%) had heard about the plans to improve the Olympic Park and the surrounding area a 'great deal' or a 'fair amount', with only a quarter (23%) of respondents having seen the plans to improve the Olympic Park area. A fifth of respondents (21%) had heard 'nothing at all'. A larger proportion of respondents in Newham had seen the plans to improve the Olympic Park area than (33%) than those who lived in Barking and Dagenham (15%) or Greenwich (16%). This is also reflected in the fact that 53% of the respondent who live in Newham had heard a 'great deal/a fair amount' about the plans compared to 43% in both Barking and Dagenham and Greenwich (see Figure C-37). Figure C-37: The extent to which respondents that had heard about – and seen – the plans of the Olympic Park 
In terms of where respondents had seen the plans: 31% had seen them in a newsletter; 19% had seen them at a local exhibition; 15% had seen them in a 'community brief' document; and 49% had seen them in an 'other' format. A quarter (23%) of the respondents are satisfied with the community consultation process on the plans for the Olympic Park and surrounding area and the opportunity to input their views. with 18% dissatisfied and 37% neither satisfied nor dissatisfied. The proportion of satisfied respondents rises to 40% for those who live in Newham and falls to 15% for those who live in Barking and Dagenham. In terms of specifics, of those respondents who had seen the plans, over half of them were satisfied with the plans for sustainability (53%), venues and sporting facilities (62%), retail and shopping facilities (65%), transport infrastructure and services (65%), leisure and cultural facilities (54%) and the Olympic Park and green spaces (64%). With generally less than 10% of respondents dissatisfied with any aspects of the plans. Only 36% of respondents were satisfied with the plans for education, health and community facilities – a finding that is consistent with respondent's views on the extent to which the 2012 Games will impact on these facilities in the local area (see Figure C-38). Figure C-38: Satisfaction with the plans for the Olympic Park and surrounding area after the Games 
1 The only exception to this is the analysis of medal performance included in Chapter 3. 2 See www.culture.gov.uk/what_we_do/research_and_statistics/7605.aspx 3 Report 3 set out in some detail the baseline and counterfactual position for each of the four legacy themes and in doing so provided the overall context against which the impact (to date) of legacy initiatives could be measured and evaluated. 4 See Report 1: Scope, research questions and data strategy. 5 Hansard, Written Ministerial Statement by The Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport on Olympic and Paralympic Games Legacy, 20th December 2010. 6 International Inspiration was announced by the then Prime Minister in India on 21 January 2008, bringing into reality the 'Singapore Vision', ie the promise made by the London 2012 bid team to "reach young people all around the world and connect them to the inspirational power of the Games so they are inspired to choose sport". The aspiration is to reach 12 million children in 20 countries and the programme aims to use the power of sport to enrich the lives of millions of children and young people of all abilities, in schools and communities across the world, particularly in developing countries, through the power of high quality and inclusive physical education, sport and play. 7 Details of the various programmes and initiatives are included in Reports 1 to 3. 8 Hansard, Written Ministerial Statement by The Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport on Olympic and Paralympic Games Legacy, 20th December 2010. 9 Active People Survey 6Q2, Once a week participation in sport (1 x 30 minutes moderate intensity), Sports England. 10 Sportivate superseded Sport Unlimited programme which ran from 2008 to 2011 building on learning from Sport Unlimited. 11 Source: South East, Six Monthly Report, 01 August 2011 to 29 February 2012 and Lincolnshire Sports Partnership, Sportivate Bulletin, May 2012. 12 Data for Gold Challenge is provided for England only, although of the 100,000 registrations around 80% are from England with the rest from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. 13 Sportivate Programme Evaluation, Annual report April 2011 – March 2012. 14 School Games Level 4 Monitoring Data, Sport England. 15 Lincolnshire Sports Partnership, Sportivate Bulletin, May 2012. 16 According to the publication, 'Inspire Programme – Key Facts & Figures', 17 'Inspire Programme – Key Facts & Figures'. 18 As reported in a Knight, Kavanagh and Page report, dated May 2012 and based on 540 surveys completed by participants (coach, participant, volunteer etc.) 19 Walk 4 Life Project Evaluation Report, July 2012. 20 Walk4Life Miles Project, Walk England, July 2012. 21 The London 2012 Games in the South East of England, Review of Achievements, 15th March 2011. 22 Partnerships are 'families' of schools which typically comprise a Specialist Sports College linked to a set of secondary schools, each of which has a further group of primary and special schools clustered around it. The Partnership Development Manager is at the core of the Strategy and is responsible for managing the partnership. 23 Sport Industry Research Centre and Evaluation of the Change 4 Life School Sports Clubs Programme, Final Report, August 2011, SPEAR, Canterbury Christ Church University. 24 See Meta-Evaluation of the Impacts and Legacy of the London 2012 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games: Report 2 – Methods (Grant Thornton et al, 2011). 25 Club membership is defined as participants that have been a member of a sports club particularly so that they can participate in the sport in the last four weeks. 26 Data is sourced from the Active Adults Wales, Continuous Household Survey Northern Ireland and Scottish Household Survey. 27 Data sourced from Active Adults Wales and Continuous Household Survey Northern Ireland. 28 Sports Coaching in the UK III: A statistical analysis of coaches and coaching in the UK (drawing in part on BMRB 2008 data). 29 Data is not yet available for Club Leaders or Disability. 30 http://www.london2012.com/hadleigh-farm 31 http://www.london2012.com/news/articles/over-200-pre-games-training-camp-agreements-signed-across-the.html 32 Olympic and Paralympic Games: The Impact of Universities, University Week 2012, 30 April to 7 May 2012. 33 South East England, Hosting the World, Bringing Pre-Games Training Camps to the South East, Final Report March 2012. 34 Drivers Jonas Deloitte (2012). Crane Survey, London Sports Facilities, 2012. 35 Leadership and Volunteering Impact Evaluation, August 2011. 36 Leadership and Volunteering Impact Evaluation, Young Ambassadors Programme, Report 2011. 37 Evaluation of the School Sport Coaching Programme, Final Report, Institute of Youth Sport, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences and Loughborough University, September 2011. 38 Recruit into Coaching, Year One Evaluation Report, sports coach UK, September 2010. 39 Evaluation of the Change 4 Life School Sports Clubs Programme, Final Report, August 2011, SPEAR, Canterbury Christ Church University. 40 Published data changed in 2005 from what was actually spent to the maximum that was committed for any given event. 41 It should be noted that it is not possible to achieve a 100% market share in many events and sports since a country may be restricted to one or two athletes per event and thus cannot win gold, silver and bronze. 42 The medals target strategy has changed over the 2000 to 2012 Games period. 2012 was the 1st year where a target range was introduced (ie min 40, max 70, average 55) with a published minimum of 48 medals as the target (roughly 85% convergence on the average). In 2008 the 'stretched' target was 41 medals with a convergence of 85% giving an equivalent minimum target of 35 medals. An overall medals target was not set for 2000 and 2004 - rather the total of the targets by sport were given. However using the same convergence of 85%, comparable figures of 32 and 34 respectively have been calculated. 43 It is intended that Report 5 will incorporate a detailed discussion of NGB perceptions of the uses of the additional funding by the NGBs, and their perceived effectiveness. 44 Mission Control Milestone Targets 2012 – Olympic Sports (www.uksport.gov.uk/docLib/London2012Olympic Targets.pdf) 45 UK Sports pre-Games analysis of the impact of home advantage on performance in world championships suggests that home advantage had not been associated with enhanced performance in the cases of track cycling, triathlon, modern pentathlon and basketball in recent world championships, there have been significant advantages experienced in many of the other sports evaluated in this study, although identifying a pattern of such advantage across the types of sport provides little insight except in relation to "those water-based sports where environmentally-variable conditions may provide the host country with an advantage due to familiarity with the 'field of play'. Canoe slalom, sailing and rowing all demonstrate average performance increases of 25% or more for the host country." UK Sport (n.d.) Home Advantage The Performance Benefits of Hosting Major Sporting Events. It should be acknowledged that in addition to the general home advantage for elite competition, the size and significance of the Olympics means that there may be a specific Olympic effect. 46 UK Sport (2010). Making the Case for Elite Sport: Evidence and Research to Demonstrate the Impact and Wider Effect of UK Sport's Activities and Responsibilities. London, UK Sport (unpublished). 47 UK Sport Annual Report 2010. 48 UK Sport, UK Sporting Preferences 2008, UK Sport: London. 49 UK Sport website. 50 International Inspiration Annual Review 2010-11. 51 Evaluating the Implementation and Impact of the International Inspiration Programme Phase 1 – Final Report, Loughborough Partnership – Centre for Olympic Studies & Research and Institute of Youth Sport, Loughborough University (with the School of Sport, Stirling University). 52 Beyond 2012 – the London 2012 Legacy Story (DCMS, March 2012). 53 Oxford Economic, What is the economic impact of London 2012, Lloyds Banking Group. 54 Gross Value Added (GVA) is a measure of the value of goods and services produced in an area, industry or sector of an economy. 55 Output figures refer to the value of work done or the cost of providing goods and services. It differs from GVA in that it includes the costs of raw materials. GVA will therefore be lower than output. Job years is a measure of employment. Throughout the analysis employment impacts are given in terms of 'job years' in line with standard economic convention. Each 'job year' may be a permanent post, a temporary contract, or the full-time equivalent of several part-time roles. Also, it is not cumulative: so '100 job years for a 10-year period' means 100 full-time equivalent jobs sustained for 10 years, as opposed to 100 new permanent posts created each year. Total earnings refers to the associated wages of those employed. 56 It is expected that a clearer understanding of the scale of displacement to become available later in the year when we undertake the economic impact analysis on not only the build-up, but the hosting and legacy of the Games. 57 Oxford Economics (2012). What is the economic impact of London 2012, Lloyds Banking Group. 58 Output figures refer to the value of work done or the cost of providing goods and services. It differs from GVA in that it includes the costs of raw materials. GVA will therefore be lower than output. Job years is a measure of employment. Throughout the analysis employment impacts are given in terms of 'job years' in line with standard economic convention. Each 'job year' may be a permanent post, a temporary contract, or the full-time equivalent of several part-time roles. Also, it is not cumulative: so '100 job years for a 10-year period' means 100 full-time equivalent jobs sustained for 10 years, as opposed to 100 new permanent posts created each year. Total earnings refers to the associated wages of those employed. 59 Evaluation Partnership (2011). BIS and RDAs: Interim Evaluation of CompeteFor. 60 The RDAs ceased to exist on April 1st 2012. 61 Evaluation Partnership (2011). BIS and RDAs: Interim Evaluation of CompeteFor. 62 The Evaluation Partnership Ltd (2011). BIS and RDAs: Interim Phase National Impact Evaluation of CompeteFor. 63 This is the contractual requirement to advertise sub-contracts through CompeteFor. 64 Sir John Armitt report, London 2012 – a global showcase for UK Plc. 65 DCMS Press Release (12 September 2011). 66 'The Value of the Olympic and Paralympic Games to UK tourism', Oxford Economics, September 2007. 67 A recent report by Oxford Economics for the Lloyds Banking group estimates that the additional tourism the 2012 Games attracts will contribute £2 billion to UK GDP Of this it is estimated that approximately 17% occurs in the lead up to London 2012, 35% during the 2012 Games and 48% in the post-Games period. 68 The Deloitte Consumer Review, May 2012. 69 PwC and SQW (2011). London Development Agency: 2012 Games Legacy Impact Evaluation Study: Appendix B LEST Evaluation (Final Report). 70 Budget and actual expenditure figures for the LEST projects relate to LDA expenditure only. 71 The units for the employability and skills outputs refer to numbers of individuals. 72 Ecorys (2011). London Development Agency: Evaluation of LEST – Relay London Jobs (Final Report). 73 Ecorys (2011). London Development Agency: Evaluation of LEST – Games Related Sector Training (Final Report). 74 RTP (209). London Development Agency: Evaluation of LETF (Final Report). 76 Completion of this question, and that on ethnicity was voluntary. The data is based on valid responses, which is lower than the total workforce numbers. 77 ODA Job Bulletin (July 2011). 78 PwC and SQW (2011). London Development Agency: 2012 Games Legacy Impact Evaluation Study: Appendix B LEST Evaluation (Final Report). 79 In terms of statistical robustness, the survey achieved the following: At the London wide level, a Confidence Interval of +/- 2.1% at the 95% Confidence Level (unweighted results); and at the five host borough level, a Confidence Interval of +/- 3.7% at the 95% Confidence Level (unweighted results). 80 The figures on reduction in worklessness should not be compared to the job impacts of construction in section 4.1. It is important to note that the reduction of worklessness figures relate to the impacts of Games-related programmes which cover a wider range of activity than the direct impacts of construction. 81 ODA Sustainable Development Strategy. 82 Commission for a Sustainable London 2012, Pre-Games Report Annual Review 2011/12. 83 Commission for a Sustainable London 2012, Assuming a Legacy – promises, progress and potential: a review of legacy across the London 2012 programme, March 2012. 84 Commission for a Sustainable London 2012, Assuming a Legacy – promises, progress and potential: a review of legacy across the London 2012 programme, March 2012. 85 Commission for a Sustainable London 2012, Pre-Games Report Annual Review 2011/12. 86 British Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method. 87 LOCOG (2012) Pre-Games Sustainability Report. 88 ISO press release 20/6/12, http://www.iso.org/iso/news.htm?refid=Ref1598 89 LOCOG (2012) Pre-Games Sustainability Report. 90 LOCOG (2012) Pre-Games Sustainability Report. 91 Commission for a Sustainable London 2012, Preparations Review (February 2012). 92 Commission for a Sustainable London 2012, Preparations Review (February 2012). 93 LOCOG (2012) Pre-Games Sustainability Report. 94 Data from Greater London Assembly (March 2012) Leaving a transport legacy. Olympic and Paralympic Transport Legacy Action Plan. 95 Data from Greater London Assembly (March 2012) Leaving a transport legacy. Olympic and Paralympic Transport Legacy Action Plan. 96 Data extracted from Transport for London (March 2012) 'Taking forward the Mayor's transport strategy accessibility implementation plan'. 97 Data from Greater London Assembly (March 2012) Leaving a transport legacy. Olympic and Paralympic Transport Legacy Action Plan. 98 Beyond 2012 – the London 2012 Legacy Story (DCMS, March 2012). 99 Meta-Evaluation of the Impacts and Legacy of the London 2012 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games: Report 3 – Baseline and Counterfactual (Grant Thornton et al, 2012). 100 Meta-Evaluation of the Impacts and Legacy of the London 2012 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games: Report 1 - Scope, Research Questions and Data Strategy (Grant Thornton et al, 2011). 101 The predecessor of the now Office for Civil Society. 102 The London Prepares series helped to test vital areas of operation prior to the London 2012 Games. 103 Source: Assuring a legacy – promises, progress and potential (Commission for a Sustainable London 2012, March 2012). 104 Cadbury Sports V Stripes Community Impact Report 2011. 105 Attendance at Flame Festivals and Celebrations is estimated to total 151,000 and 72,000 lined the route from Stoke Mandeville to London (including 66,000 in London). 106 A total of 290 responses were received and a further wave of the survey will be undertaken post-Games in order to capture information from projects which had not commenced activity at the time of wave one. The datasets from the two waves will be combined and the resulting analysis included in Report 5. 107 The truce strand concerned projects which promote the principles of the Olympic Truce, for example by using sport or culture to promote peace, conflict resolution and/or cultural understanding. 108 The proportion of survey respondents from London and the East Midlands is similar to the level in the overall population of Inspire Mark projects (based on LOCOG monitoring data) at 15% and 10% respectively. However, projects based in the South East were over-represented (making up 10% of the population compared to 13% of respondents) and the North West and South West were under-represented (with the North West making up 9% of survey responses compared to 12% of the population, and South West projects accounting for 4% of responses compared to a share of 10% of the population). Directory: images -> publications images -> New embedded S images -> Creating Buy-In – Building Relationships images -> Deadline: Saturday, March 12th, 2016 images -> News items from Raising Our Voices images -> Last year four of the best Afrikaans Christian singers joined forces to tour Down Under with the production ‘Manne wat Glo’ images -> World-renowned vocal ensemble sweet honey in the rock images -> Peoples Voice Café History publications -> Recipients of tickets for the olympic opening ceremony publications -> Greetings from the iehp atlantic Connection Steering Committee Download 1.96 Mb. Share with your friends:
|