UCC § 2-302 gives the court the flexibility to rewrite the parties’ K to avoid an unconscionable result (REFORMATION), possibly splitting the difference between the parties in appropriate cases. [EE 385]
Cases
Campell Soup Company v. Wentz: Output K for Wentz to deliver all of its carrots to Campbell. Wentz breached by selling carrots to neighbor because market price skyrocketed. Court refused to enforce the K against Wentz because it was so one-sided, including provisions that did not require Campbell to purchase all of Wentz’s output, but prohibiting Wentz from selling the carrots to anyone else. Court’s refusal to specifically enforce the K did not preclude Campbell from seeking legal damages.
DAMAGES INTRODUCTION Purpose of Compensatory Damages:
Tort: Restore P to substantially as good a position as P occupied prior to the wrong.
Limited to injuries that are reasonably foreseeable as a natural consequence of D’s wrongful act. No limit on damages. [Gilbert 7]
Thin skull doesn’t change liability.
F of P (duty) rather than F of damages.
No recovery of purely economic damages without injury to person or property.
Contract: put P in substantially as good a position as if the K has been performed.
Limited by Hadley v. Baxendale – damages must arise naturally from the breach or be within the contemplation of the parties at the time the K was made as a probable result of the breach.
Special case: Mental anguish cannot be recovered for breach of K.
Defenses to K: duress, undue influence and unconscionability. These are not torts. [Gilbert 25]
Tort Damages vs. Contract Damages [Gilbert 21]
Tort
Contract
Goal of compensatory damages
place P to substantially as good a position as P occupied prior to the wrong
P in substantially as good a position as if the K has been performed
Does F limit recovery?
No
Yes
Certainty Required?
Yes
Yes
Causation Required?
Yes
Yes
Mental Anguish damages recoverable?
Yes
No
Punitive Damages recoverable?
Yes
No
Pre-judgment interest recovery generally governed by statute.