The Stupid 365 Project, Day 7: The Dance
October 7th, 2010
For some reason, the sight of snow descending on fire always makes me think of the ancient world — legionaries in sheepskin warming themselves at a brazier; mountain altars where offerings glow between wintry pillars; centaurs with torches cantering beside a frozen sea . . .
An Englishman of a certain age sees a group of road-workers gathered around a fire they’ve built in a bucket as the London snow pelts down, and the sight triggers these Classical images, which, in turn lead the observer back to the time he was in school. That’s the opening of A Question of Upbringing, the first of the twelve novels that make up Anthony Powell’s monumental A Dance to the Music of Time, which — at this time in my life, when I’m approaching the age of that Englishman — is probably my favorite novel of the 20th century.
(By “novel” I mean the entire twelve-novel sequence, which actually comprises a single, monumental story.)
Reading books, I realize now, is more complicated than I used to think it was. The reading of a book is an exchange between the book and the reader, a kind of mental and emotional jigsaw puzzle in which the book supplies some pieces and the reader offers up the rest. Either the pieces from the book fit into the spaces formed by the reader’s tastes and desires and experiences, or they don’t. That’s why, in my experience, anyway, we can love at 50 a book that bored us senseless at 21 or wonder at 60 what the hell we saw in a book we practically built a shrine to at 30.
I’ve read A Dance to the Music of Time four times and loved it every time, although I’ve loved it differently. That makes sense, since Dance does nothing less ambitious than to follow four English boys of just-below-upper-class status through the entire course of their lives, a swath of time that includes bits of World War I and ends in the improbable Sixties. In telling the “boys’” stories, Powell charts the course, over five decades, of a whole world.
The American publishers, possibly attempting to clarify the overall organization of the series, released it in four thick paperback volumes, entitled “Spring,” Summer,” and so forth, later changed to “First Movement,” “Second Movement,” etc. I was in my mid-twenties when I stole the “Spring” volume. (I stole a lot in those days.) I was unhappy,working an unsatisfying job, barely speaking to people I had long regarded as my closest friends. I was also just beginning to drink too much, living alone in the house Simeon Grist later occupied, and feeling — in all — treacherously abandoned by my youth. I was prematurely nostalgic for the days when I was always part of a group and no one seemed to have a subconscious: We all told each other everything. Powell might have written the first three books specifically for me at that point in my life.
Those books, A Question of Upbringing, A Buyer’s Market, and The Acceptance World, follow the four boys through school, university, and their entry into the wider and colder world beyond. The narrator, Nick Jenkins, and his two closest friends, Peter Templer and Charles Stringham, are from good families, although only Templer’s has real money; and the fourth, Widmerpool, is the only son of a widowed mother whose hold on gentility is grimly precarious. Jenkins, Stringham, and Templer are attractive, amusing, and adaptable. While at first, as boys, they seem similar, they become more individual as they grow up and (inevitably) apart. Widmerpool, on the other hand, never seems similar to anyone. He’s the boy in every school whom all the others look down on. The only thing that his schoolmates admire about him is his doggedness, a characteristic that will, over decades turn him into the greatest and most complex comic monster I know of, outside Shakespeare.
The rise to considerable power, and the ultimate fall, of Widmerpool — often at the expense (and sometimes to the horror and/or amusement) of his former schoolmates — is one of the primary threads of the series. Widmerpool is a Sacred Monster, utterly self-involved except for his slavish devotion to his widowed mother, and ultimately he shrugs even her off as he climbs higher and higher. One of the things that dazzles me about the series, which was written and published over a span of 24 years, between 1951 and 1975, is the foresight with which Powell wrote the earliest volumes. The poisonous Pamela Flitton, for example, makes her first entrance in one of the first three books at the age of four, creating an indelible impression during a society wedding by vomiting into the church’s baptismal font. Ten or eleven books later, Pamela is a primary architect of Widmerpool’s hellacious and very public humiliation.
But what captivated me on my first reading of the three books combined into Spring was the story of the creation and partial dissolution of three youthful friendships — and especially the deterioration, mostly through drink, of the most brilliant of them while the odd boy out, Widmerpool, glumly claws his way into the world of influence. Every reading since has reinforced the power and the remarkable humor in those three books, but with each successive reading, a new “season” opens itself to me as I, like the characters, progress from Spring into Summer, Autumn, and Winter.
It’s art of a very formal kind, like the Poussin painting from which the series takes its name, but if you can put up with the formality of the narrative and Powell’s lack of pretense that he’s doing anything but writing a novel — he’s not aspiring to naturalism or even realism — you may love these books as much as I do. And, really, what’s to lose? You can get them free at any decent library. And they’ve illuminated my life.
Wow — we’re a whole week into the project. Only 51 weeks (and a day) to go. Thanks for reading along.
|
This entry was posted on Thursday, October 7th, 2010 at 11:23 am and is filed under All Blogs. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
9 Responses to “The Stupid 365 Project, Day 7: The Dance” -
EverettK Says:
October 7th, 2010 at 1:14 pm
You’ve mentioned several times (well, two come to mind, at least) the concept of a book being “an exchange between the book [or author] and the reader.” This is a concept that I’ve read other authors put forward (Lois McMaster Bujold is one, in particular), and must be a rather common realization that most authors arrive at, at least, those who are at all aware of the craft that they wield.
Amazingly, I don’t think I’d ever heard of Anthony Powell’s works. The books sound quite interesting. I’ll have to give them a try. Thanks!
-
Kaye Barley Says:
October 7th, 2010 at 1:47 pm
I’m very much enjoying and finding your project fascinating and hope you’ll keep it up for at least another 51 weeks (plus a day).
-
Suzanna Says:
October 7th, 2010 at 5:31 pm
This sounds like a masterpiece and I reallyl don’t want to miss it.
What is it about the English and their knack for great character names?
Widmerpool? And since I couldn’t recall specifics I looked up a few from Dickens: Pecksniff, Sweedlepipe and Chuzzlewit.
Thanks for the great review, Tim!
-
Timothy Hallinan Says:
October 7th, 2010 at 8:05 pm
Everett, I’m actually more aware of this as a reader than as a writer. David Sedaris once said something like, “Writing gives you the illusion of control, and then you realize it’s just an illusion, that people are going to bring their own stuff into it.” And that’s undoubtedly true, but I rarely think about it except to make sure that things are as clear as I can make them. In THE QUEEN OF PATPONG, though, I worked hard to make it difficult for anyone to read the book for any kind of titillating experience. Anthony Powell is a great novelist, but very much a mannerist, and some people want writing to be a little less literary and a little more naturalistic.
Hi, Kaye, and thanks for dropping by. We shall see where we are in a month or so — although I have a great Halloween story in mind, probably continued over three days.
Soozie, the Brits are the best at names — Dickens is the all-time champ, but Trollope is no slouch, either. Trollope opened to me the whole world of England between the wars — the Bright Young People, the cult of aestheticism, writers like Maugham and Cyril Connelly. (Incidentally, there’s a whole cottage industry of trying to guess who some of the real-life models for the characters in the DANCE were — there seems to be a sort of consensus that the dreadful Pamela Flitton was based on Connolly’s wife, and Aleister Crowley is certainly the basis for the amazingly fraudulent Dr. Trelawney.
One of the best ways to read Powell is out loud, if Morgan would stand for it. The sentences are immensely long at times, but the punctuation will guide you through them even at first out-loud reading.
-
fairyhedgehog Says:
October 7th, 2010 at 10:27 pm
I’m fascinated by your take on these books but I think I prefer something a little easier to read. Some books seem to read themselves to you, it’s so effortless, and I enjoy that.
-
fairyhedgehog Says:
October 7th, 2010 at 10:29 pm
Oh, and The Fourth Watcher has arrived. I can’t wait to read it.
-
Timothy Hallinan Says:
October 8th, 2010 at 8:38 am
FHH, it’s definitely lit-fic, and definitely in the classical mode, but it’s also one of the greatest and funniest soap operas ever written. The “Dance” of the title refers to the way characters meet, interact, separated, re-meet, group differently, separate, etc., etc. over a lifetime. When I read it out loud to my wife, she went nuts every time a character glimpsed briefly turned out to be Widmerpool.
And I’m really glad WATCHER has arrived.
-
Larissa Says:
October 8th, 2010 at 12:05 pm
Congrats on making it through a week. I think you’ll find this all very meditative when it’s over (c: And yes, keep it all up. I’ve never heard of these books but I’m interested in going to check them out. I’m currently reading an old classic that I missed somehow in earlier times and it’s a brilliant experience. It might even be worth a post on my own blog. Maybe.
-
Timothy Hallinan Says:
October 8th, 2010 at 7:50 pm
Riss, thanks a lot. Meditative — well, not yet. It feels a lot like weight-lifting, except that you never know, until you pick up the bar bell, how much the damn thing weighs. The whole discipline is essentially, “300 words, right now, on whatever idea seems to work.” No tossing it and starting over, no stockpiling them, no cheating and writing them the night before. Come downstairs, turn on computer, make coffee, drink first cup, sit at computer, write, then post the damn thing. Then go out and run or go to the gym, and write books for the rest of the day. It actually has gotten my word count on the current book up.
If you try DANCE, let me caution patience — it takes its time to weave its spell. But, boy, is it worth it.
|
Share with your friends: |