Kurebwa mercy thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for doctor of philosophy


Profiles of the rural primary school teachers in individual interviews



Download 1.72 Mb.
Page18/29
Date23.04.2018
Size1.72 Mb.
#46668
1   ...   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   ...   29

4.3.4 Profiles of the rural primary school teachers in individual interviews


Six teachers participated in individual rural interviews. Each school was represented by one teacher. The selection of teachers targeted those who did not participate in focus groups. The analysis of Table 4.6 below indicated that 2 teachers were male and 4 teachers were female. The teachers’ ages ranged from 34 to 40 years. All the participating teachers taught 8 to 11 subjects. Moreover, all the participating teachers had ‘O’ levels, 5 had Diplomas while 1 had a BEd. The experience of the teachers ranged from 7 to 19 years.
Considering their working experience as well as both academic and professional qualifications, it would appear highly likely that the teachers were conversant with the assessment problems in the primary schools.
Table 4.6 Profiles of rural teachers in the individual interviews




School 1

School 2

School 3


School 4

School 5

School 6

Sex

Male

Male

Female

Female

Female

Female

Highest Academic Qualifications

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

Highest Professional Qualifications

C.E

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

Further Study

NIL

NIL


NIL

NIL

NIL

BEd

Number of subjects taught

11

9

10

10

11

10

Grades taught

6

5

4

3

6

7


Number of learners taught

49

35

38

45

37

39

Number of years of teaching

10

7

15

8



19

10

Number of years at present school

10

1

10

3

10

6

Age

38

40

36

34

42

40



4.3.5 The urban primary school teachers’ focus groups


Altogether, 24 teachers participated in the focus group interviews conducted during the empirical study. Each focus group had one representative from each of the participating schools. The teachers were deliberately selected to cater for the various levels (grades) and specialist teachers. There was also a deliberate attempt to maintain gender balance.
Table 4.7 Profiles of urban teachers in the first focus group





School 1

School 2

School 3

School 4

School 5

School 6

Sex

Male

Male

Female

Female

Female

Female

Highest Academic Qualifications

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

Highest Professional Qualifications

C.E

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

Further Study

NIL

BTech

NIL

BSc Counseling

NIL

NIL

Number of subjects taught

1

1

11

10

11

10

Grades taught

4,5,6,7

3-7

6

5

6

5

Number of learners taught

600

53

48

43

47

45

Number of years of teaching

28

18

4

15

6

10

Number of years at present school

15




2

1

3

6

Age

48

55

36

39

36

31


Table 4.8 Profiles of urban teachers in the second focus group





School 1

School 2

School 3

School 4

School 5

School 6

Sex

Male

Female

Female

Female

Female

Female

Highest Academic Qualifications

‘A’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

Highest Professional Qualifications

BEd (EAPPS)

BTech Degree

C.E.

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

Further Study

MEd (EAPPS)

NIL

BSc Psychology

BSc Counselling

NIL

NIL

Number of subjects taught

11

10

10

11

11

10

Grades taught

6

4

7

5

3

6

Number of learners taught

50

57

40

40

48

32

Number of years of teaching

22

16

21

10

14

17

Number of years at present school

11/2

4

1

3

8

4

Age

44

40

45

40

45

40

Table 4.9 Profiles of urban teachers in the third focus group





School 1

School 2

School 3

School 4

School 5

School 6

Sex

Female

Female

Female

Male

Female

Female

Highest Academic Qualifications

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

Highest Professional Qualifications

NIL

BSc SPED

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

Further Study

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

Number of subjects taught

10

10

11

11

11

11

Grades taught

7

5

5

6

4

3

Number of learners taught

50

44

48

45

46

40

Number of years of teaching

17

7

4

2

35

15

Number of years at present school

9

2

1

2

4

2

Age

46

31

35

30

55

40



Table 4.10 Profiles of urban teachers in the fourth focus group





School 1

School 2

School 3

School 4

School 5

School 6

Sex

Male

Female

Female

Female

Male

Female

Highest Academic Qualifications

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

Highest Professional Qualifications

CE

DipEd

DipEd

BEd (EAPPS)

DipEd

DipEd

Further Study

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

Number of subjects taught

10

11

11

10

11

11

Grades taught

3

5

6

6

7

5

Number of learners taught

52

42

48

47

50

45

Number of years of teaching

30

10

7

33

10

10

Number of years at

present school

4

3

3

18

3

2

Age

52

42

35

56

38

43

Table 4.11 Profiles of rural teachers in the first focus group




School 7

School 8

School 9

School I0

School 11

School 12

Sex

Female

Male

Male

Male

Female

Male

Highest Academic Qualifications

‘A’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

JC

‘O’ level

‘A’ level

Highest Professional Qualifications

DipEd

DipEd

C.E.

PTL

DipEd

DipEd

Further Study

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL


NIL

NIL

Number of subjects taught

11

11

11

11

10

11

Grades taught

6

4

6

3

7

5

Number of learners taught

49

46

38

30

35

43

Number of years of teaching

7

13

6

46

8

20

Number of years at present school

1

3

3

12

4

12

Age

29

44

31

66

45

44


Table 4.12 Profiles of rural teachers in the second focus group




School 1

School 2

School 3

School 4

School 5

School 6

Sex

Female

Male

Female

Female

Female

Male


Highest Academic Qualifications

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

Highest Professional Qualifications

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

Further Study

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

Number of subjects taught

11

11

11

11

10

10

Grades taught

4

7

5

4

4

3

Number of learners taught

35

44

40

53

40

37

Number of years of teaching

2

10

10

13

8

4

Number of years at present school

1

3

6

13

4

2


Table 4.13 Profiles of rural teachers in the third focus group





School 1

School 2

School 3

School 4

School 5

School 6

Sex

Female

Male

Female

Female

Female

Female

Highest Academic Qualifications

‘A’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

Highest Professional Qualifications

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

Further Study

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

Number of subjects taught

11

11

10

10

10

1I

Grades taught

3

6

5

5

3

7

Number of learners taught

50

57

40

40

48

32

Number of years of teaching

5

13

7

16

12

9

Number of years at present school

2

1

4

3

2

6

Age

25

43


34

54

43

30


Table 4.14 Profiles of rural teachers in the fourth focus group





School 1

School 2

School 3

School 4

School 5

School 6

Sex

Female

male

Female

Female

Male

Female

Highest Academic Qualifications

‘A’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

Highest Professional Qualifications

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

DipEd

Further Study

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

BSc Psychology

NIL

Number of subjects taught

10

10

10

11

11

1I

Grades taught

3

7

6

7

5

4

Number of learners taught

37

37

40

38

37

41

Number of years of teaching

41

13

16

10

13

12

Number of years at present school

15

5

1

2

5

4

Age

62

46


40

38

46

35


KEY:

DipEd - Diploma in Education

C.E - Certificate in Education

‘O’ level - Ordinary level

‘A’ level - Advanced level

BTech - Bachelor of Technology

BEd (EAPPS) - Bachelor of Educational Administration, Planning and

Policy Studies

MEd (EAPPS) - Masters in Educational Administration, Planning and

Policy Studies

BSc Psychology - Bachelor of Science in Psychology

BSc Counseling - Bachelor of Science in Counseling

BSc SPED - Bachelor of Science in Special Education

PTL - Primary Teachers Lower



J C - Junior Certificate

4.3.5.1 Urban primary school teachers focus group.


An analysis of Tables 4.7, 4.8, 4.9 and 4.10 revealed that the teachers included in the four focus groups were mostly female. Only 8 teachers were male while 16 were female. This was because there were more female teachers in the schools than male teachers (see Table 4.1). The teachers’ age ranges were between 31 to 56 years. Their teaching experience ranged from 1 to 30 years.
Of all the participating teachers, 4 had degrees and the rest either had a Certificate in Education or a Diploma in Education. 5 of the teachers were also pursuing further studies. 3 teachers taught one subject from Grade 3-7 while the rest of the teachers taught 10-11 subjects. One specialist teacher taught 600 pupils while the class sizes of other teachers ranged from 40-53.

4.3.5.2 Rural primary school teachers’ focus group.


An analysis of tables 4.11, 4.12, 4.13, 4.14 revealed that of the rural teachers included in the focus groups, 16 were female and 8 were male. The teachers’ ages ranged from 27 to 54 years. Of all the participating teachers, 2 had degrees and 21 had Diplomas in education and 1 had a Primary Teachers Lower Certificate. All participants taught 10 to 11 subjects. The head teachers of the rural schools the researcher visited during this research indicated that they did not have any specialist teachers as yet. Appendix 9 was used to collect data considered important to the research.


Table 4.15 Profiles for ZIMSEC staff.

Sex

Male

Male

Age

48

50

Highest Academic Qualifications

‘O’ level

‘O’ level

Highest Professional Qualifications

MEd

BEd

Number of years with the Organisation

8

6

Number of years in present post

2

3



4.3.6 The ZIMSEC staff.


Two ZIMSEC staff members participated in this empirical study (see Table 4.15). An analysis of Table 4.15 revealed that the two officers interviewed were both males aged 48 and 50 respectively. One has a first degree and the other one had a master’s degree in education. Both the participating officers have been with the organisation for 6 and 8 years respectively. From the information regarding their experience, age and qualifications, theZIMSEC staff members, likely gave valid responses concerning assessment problems in the primary schools. This is because their experience coupled by their qualifications could enable them to give relevant responses.
Appendix 10 was used to collect data considered to be important in this rese

4.16 Profiles for Ministry of Education, Sport, Arts and Culture officers




1

2

3

4

Sex

Male

Male

Male

Male

Age

57

60

61

57

Highest Academic Qualifications

‘O’ Level

‘O’ Level

‘O’ Level

‘O’ Level

Highest Professional Qualifications

BEd

BSc (Physics and Maths)

BEd

BEd

Number of years with Ministry

35

35

38

27

Number of years at present post

2

5

19

4

4.3.7 Ministry of Education, Sport, Arts and Culture Officers


An analysis of Table 4.16 reveals that all education officers interviewed in this research were male. Their ages ranged from 57 to 61 years. 3 had first degrees in education and 1 had a first degree in mathematics and physics. Their experience in education ranged from 27 to 35 years and the number of years at present post ranged from 2 to 19 years. Considering the qualifications and experience of the Ministry of Education, Sport, Arts and Culture officers, it was likely that their responses pertaining assessment problems in the schools were valid. Appendix 11 was used to collect data considered to be important in this research.

4.3.8 College lecturers


An analysis of Table 4.17 shows that most of the Teachers college lecturers interviewed in this research were female. Their ages ranged from 36 to 50 years. Two of them had first degrees while the rest had masters degrees in different areas. Their experience range was 2-22 years. Based on their ages and level of experience, the Teachers college lecturers were likely to be aware of assessment knowledge that was imparted on their learners.
Table 4.17 Profiles for College Lecturers




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Sex


Male

Female

Male

Female

Female

Female

Female

Male

Age


37

36

50

48

40

48

53

43

Highest Academic Qualification

‘A’Level

‘O’level

‘A’Level


‘O’level

‘O’level

‘A’Level


‘A’Level


‘A’Level


Highest Professional Qualification

MEd

Sociology



BEd

History


BA

(+GRAD


.CE)


MEd

BEd

Early


Childhood

MEd

Curriculum



M.Phil

Med

Number of years as a lecturer

3

2

21


27

5

6

22

6

Number of years at present college


3

2

21

10

5

6

22

6




Download 1.72 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   ...   29




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page