Murray Turoff
Distinguished Professor
Hulburt Professor of MIS
Information Systems Department
New Jersey Institute of Technology (Newark, NJ)
EDUCATION
Ph.D. – Physics, Brandeis University, 1965
B. A. – Mathematics and Physics, University of California at Berkeley, 1958
AWARDS
Pioneer Award by Electronic Frontiers Foundation, 1994
Rodale Award for Creativity, Electronic Network Association, 1990
RESEARCH INTERESTS
Information Systems, Computer Mediated Communication Systems, Delphi Design, Policy Analysis, Planning Methodologies, Interface Design, Systems Evaluation, Technological Forecasting & Assessment, Collaborative Systems & Group DSSs, Office Automation, Management Information Systems, Social Impacts of Computer & Information Systems, and Management of Computer and Information Systems
|
|
KEY PUBLICATIONS
-
Turoff, M. (1971). "Delphi and its Potential Impact on Information Systems." AFIPS Conference Proceedings, Fall Joint Comptuer Conference 39: 317-326.
|
| -
Turoff, M. (1991). "Computer Mediated Communication Requirements for Group Support." Journal of Organizational Computing 1(1): 85-113.
|
|
Joesoph S. Valacich
The Marian E. Smith Presidential Endowed Chair
The George and Carolyn Hubman Distinguished Professor in Information Systems
School of Accounting, Information Systems & Business Law
Washington State University (Pullman, Washington)
EDUCATION
Ph.D. – Management Information Systems, University of Arizona, 1989
MBA – General Management, University of Montana, Missoula, 1983
BS – Computer Science, University of Montana, Missoula, 1982
AWARDS
Sanjay Subhedar Faculty Fellow, 1996
RESEARCH INTERESTS
Electronic commerce, the diffusion of technology in organizations, group decision behavior, and distance learning.
|
|
KEY PUBLICATIONS
-
Nunamaker, J.F., Jr.; Dennis, A.R.; Valacich, J.S.; Vogel, D.R.; and George, J.F. Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Communications of the ACM, 34, 7 (July 1991), 40-61.
|
| -
Nunamaker, J.F., Jr.; Dennis, A.R.; Valacich, J.S. Information Technology for Negotiating Groups: Generating Options for Mutual Gain. Management Science, 37, 10 (Oct 1991), 1325-1346.
|
| -
Connolly, T.; Jessup, L.M.; Valacich, J.S. Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science, 36 (1990), 689-703.
|
| Background
Data management and database technology was originally driven by need to reliably store information. It is considered the core of the MIS field, and it can be divided into four distinct categories: network data storage, hierarchical database technology, relational database technology, and object-oriented database technology.
Timeline
The first network data storage system was created in 1961 by Charles Bachman while working at General Electric Company. The storage system was in the form of an integrated store system (IDS), and it became very successful for that time.
Hierarchical databases became popular in the late 1960s, and IBM developed the Information Management System (IMS) in 1968. The hierarchical database never reached the popularity of the network database, but some products still use the hierarchical database model.
The defining moment for data management came in 1970 with the publishing of Edgar Codd’s “A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data Banks,” which introduced the relational database model. His relational theory became database model became the foundation for the relational database prominently used today. However, the relational model did not receive immediate acceptance. In 1974, Bachman and Codd had an open debate between the pros and cons of the relational database model. Codd eventually won this argument, and that led to overall acceptance of the relational database.
Michael Stonebraker and Eugene Wong led the INGRES group at the University of California, Berkeley created the first prototype of the relational database. This prototype led to Ingres, Corp., Sybase, and SQL Server. At nearly the same time, Ray Boyce and Don Chamberlin developed the Structured Query Language (SQL), which was part of IBM’s implementation of the relational database, called SYSTEM R. Both of these prototypes were awarded the Software System Award by the Association for Computing Machinery in 1988.
Soon after these two famous prototypes were created, Peter Pin-Shan Chen published the famous paper, “The Entity-Relationship Model – Toward a Unified View of Data,” which introduced the entity-relationship model. This model incorporated semantic-based relationships into database design, this entity-relationship model has been the most widely used method for conceptual database design, and it has been extended by many authors in other areas of research.
In 1985, Stonebraker’s INGRES group changed into the Postgres group, and it changed it’s focus to researching the concept of object-oriented databases. A year later, the company GRAPHEL, Co. released the first commercial object-oriented database called Gbase. Much research has been done on the improvements of the object-oriented model over the relational model. However, because of the success of the relational database, the adoption of object-oriented database has not been that widely spread, partly because organizations have so much information sunk into the relational model, and partly because the relational model works so well.
Within the past fifteen years, the focus of research in data management has shifted from new database models to that of integrating different database schemas. In 1986, Batini defined a framework for schema integration in “A Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for Database Schema Integration.” In 1992, Spaccapietra approached integrating different schemas in his paper, “Model Independent Assertions For Integration Of Heterogeneous Schemas.” His model provided a way to integrate schemas using only basic corresponding elements and how they correspond. In Heterogeneous Distributed Database Systems, Ram proposes the Unifying Semantic Model (USM) as a model to semantically integrate heterogeneous data sources.
Lastly, the past few years has seen new models of database that are based on XML. With the ever-growing popularity of the Internet and especially database-driven applications on the World Wide Web, XML is gaining ground as a more-powerful markup language than HTML. In 1999, AG invented Tamino, which is a native XML database. It stores original XML objects and uses XML query techniques to search for information..
Share with your friends: |