- A central measure of the effectiveness of RM efforts is relational equity, which should be assessed on an ongoing basis to support learning and refinement over time
- An effective measure of relational equity requires a clear definition of the target of that measure
- If RM efforts inherently result in longer relationships, then it may seem that duration should be a good proxy for relationship strength or equity
- Another approach links RM programs and relationship equity measures to customer lifetime value, to isolate what portion of the CLV results from relationship equity or specific RM programs
- Although this CLV approach is very helpful, in that it integrates multiple financial outcomes into one measure and captures future financial benefits, it cannot capture some of the potential benefits of a strong relational bond, such as positive WOM that leads to new customer acquisition
Key Relationship Dimensions and Example Measures
Multivariate Regression Analysis
Multivariate regression is a statistical approach used to quantify the sign and magnitude of the relationship between a focal dependent variable (marketing outcome in our context) and several independent variables (e.g., marketing efforts).
DAT 7.1
Description
- To determine how one of multiple marketing interventions incrementally affects observed marketing outcomes.
- To compare the effects of multiple marketing interventions on marketing outcomes.
- To predict the likely market outcomes due to various combinations of marketing interventions.
When to Use It
How it Works
The purpose of multivariate regression is to capture the statistical association between a focal marketing outcome of interest (e.g., sales, loyalty, CLV, profitability) and several marketing interventions that simultaneously may affect the focal outcome (e.g., relationship marketing efforts, marketing mix). Performing a multivariate regression enables five important discoveries.
First, we can discern whether a particular marketing intervention truly influences a marketing outcome. That is, a multivariate regression can provide statistical validation of the significance of the impact of a certain marketing intervention.
Second, we learn the sign of the relationship between a marketing invention and a marketing outcome. In some cases, the sign is well-known a priori (e.g., as the price increases, sales decrease), but in others, it remains unclear. For example, a firm may not know whether a financially oriented relationship marketing program offering free shipping ultimately increases CLV. The regression can help the firm verify the sign of the relationship.
Third, a multivariate regression helps researchers compare the relative strength of multiple marketing interventions. For example, a firm may need to know which of its social, structural, or financial relationship marketing efforts are most and least influential, and this determination is enabled by a regression.
Fourth, with a multivariate regression, we can control for confounds while gauging the relationship between marketing interventions and marketing outcomes. For example, while trying to understand the relationship between financial relationship marketing efforts by a supplier firm devoted to a buyer firm and marketing outcomes earned from this buyer firm, we might control for the buyer firm’s size, because larger firms typically buy more, regardless of whether they receive marketing interventions.
Fifth and finally, multivariate regression enables predictions of the marketing outcomes following from various scenarios of marketing interventions, which is useful in scenario analysis. If the marketing outcome is given by Y, and we have three marketing interventions (X1, X2, and X3), and two confounds (Z1, and Z2), the formula is given by:
where to are the coefficients (or weights) that capture the sign and strength of the relationship between the marketing interventions and the marketing outcome, and is a random error term. In most cases, we would have data about past outcomes and marketing inventions/confounds, then rely on software such as SAS or SPSS to provide the sign, strength, and statistical significance of the coefficients.
A B2B supplier of electrical equipment is going through a redesign of its relationship marketing efforts directed at buyers, and it seeks to ensure that it is investing in RM efforts that boost the CLV of each of its buyers. Currently, the supplier is investing in three kinds of RM efforts: social (e.g., meals, sporting events), structural (e.g., customized packaging), and financial (e.g., free giveaways of small electrical parts that are part of the electrical installation service it provides).
To perform this exercise, the supplier created a database of the CLV of its 3,500 buyers, as well its investments in social RM (SRM), structural RM (StRM), and financial RM (FRM) for each of these buyers. It also collected data on the buyers’ location (east or west coast), the number of employees in the buyer firm, and the firm industry type (corporate or government). The results showed:
- Social RM efforts and financial RM efforts paid off, whereas structural RM efforts did not exert any statistically significant impact on buyer CLV (coefficient = .20, p > .05).
- Financial RM and social RM efforts significantly increased CLV; financial RM efforts were twice as effective as social RM efforts in this context, because the coefficient associated with FRM (coefficient =2.50, p < .05) was approximately twice as large as the coefficient associated with SRM (coefficient = 1.26, p < .05).
- Firms on the east coast were much more likely to buy compared with firms on the west coast (coefficient = .80, p < .05). Similarly, larger firms generally had a higher CLV than smaller firms (coefficient = 1.10, p < .05). Whether the buyer was a corporate or government buyer did not matter (coefficient = .08, p > .05).
- The supplier used the coefficients obtained from this regression to predict the increase in the CLV when it instituted various financial and social RM combinations.
Based on the analysis, the supplier also launched another study, to understand why its structural RM efforts were not successful.
Share with your friends: |