November 2005 Review Period: July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2005 Table of Contents



Download 1.98 Mb.
Page44/44
Date14.08.2017
Size1.98 Mb.
#32054
1   ...   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44

Table B-4a


2003 Credit Hours Taught by Department Faculty by Level and Faculty Type

Faculty Type

Undergrad Core


Undergrad

Lower Division

Undergrad


Upper Division

Graduate


Tenure-Track




66

1547

1086

Non Tenure-Track




150

141

453

PTI




66

546

45

GTA













Other (specify)















Table B-4b


2004 Credit Hour Generation by Level and Faculty Type

Faculty Type

Undergrad Core


Undergrad

Lower Division

Undergrad


Upper Division

Graduate


Tenure-Track







1228

1099

Non Tenure-Track







597

228

PTI




258

474

96

GTA













Other (specify)







45





Table B-4c


2005 Credit Hour Generation by Level and Faculty Type

Faculty Type

Undergrad


Core

Undergrad Lower Division


Undergrad

Upper Division

Graduate


Tenure-Track

120




1714

1211

Non Tenure-Track




84

684

486

PTI




216

702

30

GTA













Other (specify)







153





Table E-1

Mean Standardized Graduate Admission Test Scores and GPAs for 2003-2005


Year

Applicants

Admitted Students


Matriculated Students

GPA

Ad. Test

Score

GPA

Ad. Test

Score

GPA

Ad. Test

Score

2003



















MSW-Reg


3.04

745

3.21

901

3.11

903

MSW-AVS


2091

650












2004



















MSW-Reg


2.93

902

2.94

990

2.94

990

MSW-AVS


2.97

832

3.16

949

3.01

972

2005



















MSW-Reg


3.13

968

2.97

1034

2.97

1034

MSW-AVS


3.18

762

2.62

918

2.62

918



Table E-2

Selection Ratio of Applicant/Accepted Graduate Students for 2004-2006




Year


# of Applicants

# of Accepted

Ratio

2003









MSW-Reg


82

34

41.5%

MSW-AVS


1







2004









MSW-Reg


71

36

50.7%

MSW-AVS


18

8

44.4%

2005









MSW-Reg


97

24

24.7%

MSW-AVS


35

10

28.6%

Revised: 4/6/05



s1 It is understood that most graduate courses at the master’s level have a research orientation. It would be the exception if a course did not.


,2 An exception can be made in that one member of a doctoral committee who is not a member of the graduate faculty can be included as part of a doctoral dissertation committee if he/she brings special needed expertise to that committee.


1 Evaluated for US Immigration and Naturalization Service and GSU as MSW equivalent.

2 Many of the elements in the model are very closely linked to each other and/or contingent upon other elements. Thus the time frame and sequencing of events is not implied in this framework except in each specific row. All of the later rows however, are dependent on the first.



Download 1.98 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page