Ir231 1st Lec. 24/09/2019


• st historical sociology also takes rather holistic approach in understanding



Download 0.86 Mb.
View original pdf
Page27/39
Date07.12.2023
Size0.86 Mb.
#62861
1   ...   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   ...   39
IR231 1
Ayşe-Şevval-Raylaz Assignment 2, book assignment, ENG102 Final, adm1122, Adm1122 midterm
• st historical sociology also takes rather holistic approach in understanding
world events
• 2nd imp issue, there emphasis on material basis, realistic approach into
social events the idea of modes of prod, that shape social and political
superstructure laying at the core of Marxism
the base, with mode of production
• catalyst of change is also seen in economic dimension of relations
• mode of prod, the base, having influence on superstructure (political social structure)
• there is a direct affect impact on what goes on in economic realm on politics
• society is in genre inconstant class conflict with is the basic characteristics of our major social interactions
• our economic latter determines the relations we take, the interactions we talk socially
• marxist aim is the emancipation of individual
• ultimate aim is emancipation, the free of individual from class conflict its locked in,
• how the system should help to emancipate the individual from fixed position in economic stratification
55


Marxist ARGUE THAT IN intl rel as well, there is another hidden development of world politics having to do with production
• emancipate individual and lead to more participatory behaviour
• release themselves from position their locked in production pattern
Marx did not write much about intl rel
Marx did not specifically write on intl rel, state or actors but we seethe reflection of marxist ideas in intl rel, in writings from Lenin, luxembourg
• we see his writings refelct in intl rel
-
early periods of Lenin regarding working of latest stage of capitalism
• acc Lenin imperialism latest, final stage of capitalism
• forced the world into core, periphery
• lenin was talking bout rel about core and perihphery and the constant flow of good from core to perp
• constant flow of raw material from periphery to core, meaning constant flow of wealth, a constant process of rich getting rich , and poor of getting poor bc a system working. for benefit of the core
• this systems composed of two tiers, periphery and core, we can seen periphery there is a group being dispossessed, under constant exploitation
• however ken inn underlines imp issues, by bring. core and periphery
• if we think of world capitalsit system, a division btw country s
• the burgoeusie in core can provide better work condition fro periphery workers
idea of lenin, important trait of questioning world proletariat
• he argues bc of burg in core, to export periphery further, they can use revenue to make their workers in core work better
• then periphery left on its own, a unity of concern with the workers in the core, an imp dimension
• looking at this issue, of lenin talking bout burg how they pacify their worker in the core, the reason he gives there is not revolution in core countries can be understood by two tier working capitalist system
• during s dependency school theories led by gunner frank, cardoso who were critiqued capitalist system for placing them in consnttn rs of dependency, of being locked
• the underdeveloped of periphery is bc of dev of core
56


• dev of underdeveloped, the scholars argue, that periphery was placed in industrialisation processes as constant providers of resources locked them in exploration
• has kept them inconstant depend , the poor poor rich rich
• ralf perish critics terms of trade btw core and periphery

Download 0.86 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   ...   39




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page