Motives are a difficult thing to ascertain in any human being, given the myriad factors at play in the formation of one’s thinking. It is better, in my estimation, to examine the policies Wilson favored rather than muddy the water with simple labels like “idealism,” which mean different things to different people.
A more concrete term we can grab onto might be “liberalism”: the belief that government economic or social interventions are necessary to build a just world. Wilson is important to understand as a precursor to today’s modern liberal politicians, both in domestic and foreign policy. His ideas have impacted today’s Democratic party in at least two major ways.
Economic policy: unlike his Republican successors such as Calvin Coolidge, Wilson didn’t believe in “laissez-faire” (let it be) economics. He believed the government should take an active role in stimulating the economy through establishing necessary regulations at home.
Overseas, he backed the free trade policies that modern Democrats fall over themselves to back. One can see Bill Clinton’s economic policy’s roots in Wilson. He passed the Family Leave Act as a domestic reform to marginally benefit working Americans while vigorously pursuing free trade agreements abroad.
Foreign policy: Wilson, despite his initial reluctance to get involved in World War I, was interventionist by nature. This can be explained by the American public’s marked opposition to the war: he knew from polls what a winning election issue would be, but then pursued his own policies after employing substantial spin from his propaganda agency. For these reasons, it is possible to see both Bush’s and Clinton’s attacks on Iraq, for example, as Wilsonian in nature -- the defense of a nation from an attack by an autocratic and oppressive neighbor (though Wilson wouldn’t have been a fan of Kuwait’s oppressive monarchy, either).
CONCLUSION: THE LEGACY OF WOODROW WILSON
When Wilson was president, his dogged pursuit of the Versailles Treaty necessitated traveling 8,000 miles by rail around the country. After this effort, he fell ill and never fully recovered. Since Wilson was unable to campaign for the presidency, James M. Cox took the Democratic nomination and was beaten by Warren G. Harding in 1920.
Wilson retired to Washington, D.C., where he died in 1924. He never saw most of the impact his ideas would have on the world.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adar, Korwa G. professor of International Relations at the International Studies Unit, Political Studies Department, Rhodes University, South Africa, AFRICAN STUDIES QUARTERLY, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1998, http://web.africa.ufl.edu/asq/v2/v2i2a3.htm, accessed April 22, 2002.
Ambrosius, Lloyd. WOODROW WILSON AND THE AMERICAN DIPLOMATIC TRADITION: THE TREATY FIGHT IN PERSPECTIVE; Cambridge University Press, 1990
AMERICAN EXPERIENCE: WOODROW WILSON, PBS documentary, 2001, available online at http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/wilson/sfeature/sf_legacy.html, accessed May 1, 2002.
Auchincloss, Louis. WOODROW WILSON: A PENGUIN LIFE, Viking Press, 2000.
Blum, John Morton. WOODROW WILSON AND THE POLITICS OF MORALITY, Addison-Wesley Pub Co, 1998
Chomsky, Noam. Professor of Linguistics at the Massachussets Institute of Technology, Z MAGAZINE, November 1994, p. 10.
Daniels, Josephus. THE LIFE OF WOODROW WILSON, Greenwood Publishing Group, 1971.
Gilderhus, Mark. PAN AMERICAN VISIONS: WOODROW WILSON AND THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE, 1913-1921; University of Arizona Press, 1986
Knock, Thomas. TO END ALL WARS: WOODROW WILSON AND THE QUEST FOR A NEW WORLD ORDER; Princeton University Press, 1995
Kuehl. Warren and Lynne Dunn, KEEPING THE COVENANT: AMERICAN INTERNATIONALISTS AND THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS, 1920-1939; Kent State University Press, 1997
Levin, Norman Gordon. WOODROW WILSON AND WORLD POLITICS; AMERICA'S RESPONSE TO WAR AND REVOLUTION; Oxford University Press, 1980
Link, Arthur. CAMPAIGNS FOR PROGRESSIVISM AND PEACE; Princeton University Press, 1965
Link, Arthur. THE NEW FREEDOM; Princeton University Press, 1956
Rowen, Herbert. WOODROW WILSON: A LIFE FOR WORLD PEACE, University of California Press, 1991
Zinn, Howard. Professor Emeritus of History at Boston University, Z MAGAZINE NETWORK DAILY COMMENTARY, May 7, 2000, http://www.zmag.org/Sustainers/content/2000-05/07zinn.htm, accessed April 22, 2002.
WILSON PROMOTED PROGRESSIVE SOCIAL AGENDAS
1. WILSON’S LEGACY INCLUDES MANY PROGRESSIVE AGENDAS
Ira Katznelson, Historian, AMERICAN EXPERIENCE: WOODROW WILSON, PBS documentary, 2001, p. np, available online at http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/wilson/sfeature/sf_legacy.html, accessed May 1, 2002.
Wilson matters as the first modern president. Wilson matters as the person who led the United States into global geopolitics. Wilson matters as someone who followed a progressive political agenda and who established a model for subsequent possibilities, some of which had to wait a long time to come back.
2. WILSON’S CONCEPTS OF POWER AND SOCIAL JUSTICE ARE STILL USEFUL
John M. Mulder, Historian, AMERICAN EXPERIENCE: WOODROW WILSON, PBS documentary, 2001, p. np, available online at http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/wilson/sfeature/sf_legacy.html, accessed May 1, 2002.
I see Wilson's life as tragic in the sense that he obviously lost on the League. He's not tragic however in the larger scope of American history because what he did was to help us understand the complexity of power both domestically and internationally in ways that we are still working with. The Wilsonian concepts of how political power should be used on behalf of social justice are still defining assumptions for twentieth century American political life.
3. WILSON SUPPORTED MANY PROGRESSIVE AGENDAS
Ira Katznelson, Historian, AMERICAN EXPERIENCE: WOODROW WILSON, PBS documentary, 2001, p. np, available online at http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/wilson/sfeature/sf_legacy.html, accessed May 1, 2002.
Wilson's also important as the president who presided over a number of major constitutional changes. The direct election of United States senators, prohibition, and women’s suffrage. The period of his presidency was a period therefore of extraordinary new assertion of governmental capacity in the United States, as well as presidential ambition.
4. IT WASN’T WILSONIANISM, BUT THE COLD WAR, THAT PROMOTED COLONIALISM
Korwa G. Adar, professor of International Relations at the International Studies Unit, Political Studies Department, Rhodes University, South Africa, AFRICAN STUDIES QUARTERLY, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1998, p. np, http://web.africa.ufl.edu/asq/v2/v2i2a3.htm, accessed April 22, 2002.
In the spirit of Wilsonianism, the US welcomed decolonization and independence in Africa in the 1960s. However, with Cold War prism taking a centre stage, emerging American national interests became defined in terms of combatting communism in Africa and other parts of the world. Indeed, such concerns were evident even prior to much of Africa's independence. After his visit to Africa, Vice-President Nixon in his report to Eisenhower explained that "the course of Africa's development...could well prove to be the decisive factor between the forces of freedom and international communism".
Share with your friends: |