Potential amendment E11 – Preparation of scrap metal


Annex II: responses to MS questionnaire



Download 0.61 Mb.
Page4/4
Date20.05.2018
Size0.61 Mb.
#50421
1   2   3   4

Annex II: responses to MS questionnaire


Scrap processing installations treating ELV, WEEE and mixed scrap:




Total

Of which average capacity is given

< 50 tonnes per day

50-100 tonnes per day

100-300 tonnes per day

300-3000 tonnes per day

% < 50 tonnes per day

Comments

UK

>58

58

39

12

6

1

67%




Latvia

5

5

3

1

1




60%




Poland

























Slovakia






















Minimum requirements for treating ELV and WEEE, for all installations.

Romania

























Slovenia

1

1




1







0%

No other information on these installation

Czech Republic



















No other information on these installation

Estonia

1

1

1










100%




Sweden

9

9







917




0%




Flanders

500

0
















BAT based permit system (BAT study is almost finished)

Portugal

0

0
















No BAT-based regulation, since shredding resorts under R4 recovery operations

Austria

5

5

5










100%

No national BAT based legislation or other info

TOTAL




79

48










61%




Scrap processing installations treating only ELV – Authorized Treatment Facilities and similar facilities without authorisation5




Total

Of which average capacity is given

< 50 tonnes per day

50-100 tonnes per day

100-300 tonnes per day

300-3000 tonnes per day

% < 50 tonnes per day

Comments

number of ATF

Number ELV per ATF

Number ELV treated

Ktonnes ELV per year

Average capacity per ATF (tonnes per day)

UK

>133

133

124

7

2




93%




732

2883

2110356

2039

14

Latvia

100

0



















161

311

50071

48

2

Poland

























670

119

79730

77

1

Slovakia

18

18

18










100%

Minimum requirements for treating ELV and WEEE, for all installations.

30

no info










Romania

























no info

no info










Slovenia

0

0
















No other information on these installation

20

no info










Czech Republic

59

59

58

1







98%

No other information on these installation

90

no info










Estonia

0

0



















70

214

14980

14

1

Sweden

0

0
















No info on implementation of BAT based legislation

370

641

237170

229

3

Belgium

59



















BAT based permit system (BAT study is almost finished)

48

1917

92016

89

9

Portugal

16

16

16










100%

No BAT-based regulation, since shredding resorts under R4 recovery operations

6

6500

39000

38

31

Austria

82

82

77

5







94%

No national BAT based legislation or other info

200

620

124000

120

3

Cyprus

























1

no info










Germany

























1178

1019

1200382

1160

5

Denmark

























210

381

80010

77

2

Spain

























540

1852

1000080

966

9

Greece

























4

5000

20000

19

24

France

























1000

1300

1300000

1256

6

Finland

























60

1483

88980

86

7

Hungary

























150

no info










Italy

























1800

508

914400

883

2

Ireland

























35

3714

129990

126

18

Luxem-ourg






















2




4500

9000

9

22

Lithuania

























43

465

19995

19

2

Malta

























0

0

0







Nether-lands






















500




544

272000

263

3

Romania

























no info

no info










Bulgaria

























no info

no info










TOTAL

467

308

293










95%













7518




Scrap processing installations treating only WEEE

Only WEEE

Total

Of which average capacity is given

< 50 tonnes per day

50-100 tonnes per day

100-300 tonnes per day

300-3000 tonnes per day

% < 50 tonnes per day

Comments

UK

>20

20

16

4







80%




Latvia

























Poland

























Slovakia

14

14

13

1







93%

Minimum requirements for treating ELV and WEEE, for all installations.

Romania

























Slovenia






















No other information on these installation

Czech Republic

23

23

22

1







96%

No other information on these installation

Estonia

1

1

1










100%




Sweden

17

17

13

4







76%

Partially implementation of BAT based legislation

Flanders

30

4 large
















BAT based permit system (BAT study is almost finished)

Portugal

3

3

3










100%

No BAT-based regulation, since shredding resorts under R4 recovery operations

Austria

31

31

31










100%

No national BAT based legislation or other info

TOTAL

138

109

99










91%




Scrap processing installations treating only other metal scrap




Total

< 50 tonnes per day

50-100 tonnes per day

100-300 tonnes per day

300-3000 tonnes per day

% < 50 tonnes per day

Comments

UK

>33

20

11

2




61%




Latvia






















Poland






















Slovakia






















Romania






















Slovenia






















Czech Republic

22

18

2

2




82%

No other information on these installation

Estonia






















Sweden



















Partially implementation of BAT based legislation

Flanders



















BAT based permit system (BAT study is almost finished)

Portugal

37

37










100%

No BAT-based regulation, since shredding resorts under R4 recovery operations

Austria

5

5










100%

No national BAT based legislation or other info

TOTAL

97

80

13

4




82%




Shredders, all input material (ktonnes per year) – ELV shredders with information on treated ELV only (data for ELV shredders taken from 5)




Total

Of which average capacity is given

50-100 tonnes per day

100-300 tonnes per day

300-3000 tonnes per day

% < 50 tonnes per day

ELV shredders

Number ELV per shredder

Total ELV

Ktonnes ELV per year

Average capacity (tonnes)

per ELV shredder



Comments

UK

50

7

2

3

2

0%

37

57000

2109000

2038

275

Scrap yards and ELV and WEEE treatment centres pose low environmental risks if managed properly. This is reflected in Waste Manegement Licences. For the shredders, there might be a more persuasive case for inclusion: particular problems with feedstock separation and a more rigorous permitting system might be appropriate

Latvia

0

0

0

0

0

0



















Poland

30

0













2

26000

52000

50

126




Slovakia

4

0













1

unknown










Minimum requirements for treating ELV and WEEE, for all installations.

Romania

0

0

0

0

0

0
















No data in questionnaire

Slovenia

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

unknown










No data in questionnaire

Czech Republic

2

0

0

0

0

0

3

unknown










No answer regarding national BAT-based legislation

Estonia

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

15000

15000

14

72

No shredders and no national BAT based legislation according to the questionnaire

Sweden

12

12

2

10

0

0%

7

34000

238000

230

164

9 large shredders treat ELV and WEEE; All installations are covered by national BAT-based legislation

Flanders

8

0

0

0

0

0

8

8000

64000

62

39

ELV information is for Belgium; national BAT-based legislation (Flemish BAT-study is in progress)

Portugal

4

0

0

0

0

0

2

26000

52000

50

126

No BAT-based regulation, since shreddering resorts under R4 recovery operations

Austria

6

6

1

0

5

0%

6

21000

126000

122

101

No further comments in questionnaire

Wallonia

4

0













4

8000

32000

31

39




Cyprus



















0




0










Germany

























0










Denmark

6

6










0%

13

6000

78000

75

29




Cyprus



















0

0

0










Spain



















22

45000

990000

956

217

1142857

Greece



















4

5000

20000

19

24




France



















42

31000

1302000

1258

150




Finland



















2

45000

90000

87

217




Hungary



















2




0

0

0




Italy



















18

51000

918000

887

246




Ireland



















2

65000

130000

126

314




Luxem-bourg



















0

0

0










Lithuania



















1

20000

20000

19

97




Malta



















0

0

0










Nether-lands



















11

25000

275000

266

121




Romania



















no info

no info













Bulgaria



















no info

no info













TOTAL

126













0%

189




6511000

6290






ANNEX III: requirements set by the ELV and WEEE Directives, concerning minimisation of environmental impact.


  • ELV Directive (2000/53/EC)

ANNEX I

Minimum technical requirements for treatment in accordance with Article 6(1) and (3)

1. Sites for storage (including temporary storage) of end-of-life vehicles prior to their treatament:

- impermeable surfaces for appropriate areas with the provision of spillage collection facilities, decanters and cleanser-degeasers,

- equipment for the treatment of water, including rainwater, in compliance with health and environmental regulations.

2. Sites for treatment:

- impermeable surfaces for appropriate areas with the provision of spillage collection facilities, decanters and cleanser-degreasers,

- appropriate storage for dismantled spare parts, including impermeable storage for oil-contaminated spare parts,

- appropriate containers for storage of batteries (with electrolyte neutralisation on site or elsewhere), filters and PCB/PCT-containing condensers,

- appropriate storage tanks for the segregated storage of end-of-life vehicle fluids: fuel, motor oil, gearbox oil, transmission oil, hydraulic oil, cooling liquids, antifreeze, brake fluids, battery acids, air-conditioning system fluids and any other fluid contained in the end-of-life vehicle,

- equipment for the treatment of water, including rainwater, in compliance with health and environmental regulations,

- appropriate storage for used tyres, including the prevention of fire hazards and excessive stockpiling.

3. Treatment operations for depollution of end-of-life vehicles:

- removal of batteries and liquified gas tanks,

- removal or neutralisation of potential explosive components, (e.g. air bags),

- removal and separate collection and storage of fuel, motor oil, transmission oil, gearbox oil, hydraulic oil, cooling liquids, antifreeze, brake fluids, air-conditioning system fluids and any other fluid contained in the end-of-life vehicle, unless they are necessary for the re-use of the parts concerned,

- removal, as far as feasible, of all components identified as containing mercury.

4. Treatment operations in order to promote recycling:

- removal or catalysts,

- removal of metal components containing copper, aluminium and magnesium if these metals are not segregated in the shredding process,

- removal of tyres and large plastic components (bumpers, dashboard, fluid containers, etc), if these materials are not segregated in the shredding process in such a way that they can be effectively recycled as materials,

- removal of glass.

5. Storage operations are to be carried out avoiding damage to components containing fluids or to recoverable components and spare parts.


  • WEEE Directive (2002/96/EC)

.ANNEX III

Technical requirements in accordance with Article 6(3)

1. Sites for storage (including temporary storage) of WEEE prior to their treatment (without prejudice to the requirements of Council Directive 1999/31/EC):

- impermeable surfaces for appropriate areas with the provision of spillage collection facilities and, where appropriate, decanters and cleanser-degreasers,

- weatherproof covering for appropriate areas.

2. Sites for treatment of WEEE:

- balances to measure the weight of the treated waste,

- impermeable surfaces and waterproof covering for appropriate areas with the provision of spillage collection facilities and, where appropriate, decanters and cleanser-degreasers,

- appropriate storage for disassembled spare parts,

- appropriate containers for storage of batteries, PCBs/PCTs containing capacitors and other hazardous waste such as radioactive waste,

- equipment for the treatment of water in compliance with health and environmental regulations

Annex IV: Cost data for wet scrubber systems

The information below applies for wet scrubber systems of the spray tower type and is taken from [18].



  • Investment cost:

The investment cost to treat a waste gas stream of 10000 Nm³/h with a relatively simple spray tower is 50 000 EUR, being 5000 EUR/1000Nm³. For other capacities a scaling factor to the power of 0.3 can be used.

  • Operational cost

  • personnel cost for maintenance : 0.25 manhour/day

  • operational cost 0.4 – 0.5 EUR/Nm³

  • additives and residues: the separated dust needs dewatering, transport and disposal. The water needs to be treated before discharge.

1 C. Polders, S. Vanassche en K. Vrancken, Best Beschikbare technieken voor schrootverwerking en sloperijen, final draft, VITO, 2007

2http://www.iiiee.lu.se/Publication.nsf/$webAll/5CF2CB5C4B0A5CCBC1256E8C00461370/$FILE/interim%20report-%20cvr.pdf

3 http://www.efr2.org/html/downloads/scraptrade2006.pdf

4 http://www.efr2.org/html/downloads/presentation.ppt

5 M. Savage et.al. (2006), Implementation of Waste electric and Electronic Equipment Directive in EU-25, EC, DG JRC – IPTS

6 Bio intelligence service et.al. (2006), Gather, process and summarise information for the review of the waste electric and electronic equipment directive, Synthesis report for DG ENV, , 2006

7 DEFRA (2007). Trial to establish waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) protocols. In association with the CIWM (EB), Chartered Institution of Wastes Management Environmental Body


8 GHK, Bio Intelligence Service (2006). A study to examine the costs and benefits of the ELV Directive, report for DG ENV

9 K. Forsgren, StenaMetal, personal communication.

10 Metso-Lindemann, personal communication

11 COBEREC, comments to Flemish BAT document, august 2007

12 http://glwww.mst.dk/udgiv/Publications/2000/87-7944-295-1/pdf/87-7944-297-8.pdf

13http://www2.mst.dk/common/Udgivramme/Frame.asp?pg=http://www2.mst.dk/udgiv/publications/2003/87-7972-675-5/html/kap05_eng.htm

14 François, F., Blondeel, M., Bernaert, P., Baert, R., ‘Dioxin-like PCB emissions in the Flemish region (Belgium)’, Paper presented at Dioxin 2005, Organohalogen Compounds, 2005, p. 2140 - 2143.

15 http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/pdf/end_of_waste.pdf

16 This question looks at whether the design of the option actually addresses the real problem – in the sense of focus rather than effectiveness. Effectiveness issues come after. Hence it is the intention and targeting of the option that is assessed here and not its effect.

17 These installations are shredder installations that perform other treatment processes. They are also included in the figures concerning shredders

18 VITO (2004) Gids Luchtzuiveringstechnieken – LUSS, http://www.emis.vito.be/Luss


/
VITO and BIO, with Institute for European Environmental Policy and IVM


Download 0.61 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page