Resolution resolved: The United States federal government should substantially curtail its domestic surveillance. Violations

SURVEILLANCE IS CONTINUOUS WATCH

Surveillance is continuous watch

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/surveillance?s=t

1. a watch kept over a person, group, etc., especially over a suspect, prisoner, or the like:

The suspects were under police surveillance.

2. continuous observation of a place, person, group, or ongoing activity in order to gather information:

video cameras used for covert surveillance. See also electronic surveillance.

3. attentive observation, as to oversee and direct someone or something:

increased surveillance of patients with chronic liver disease.
Surveillance is constant watch

Webster's 10 Webster's New World College Dictionary Copyright © 2010 by Wiley Publishing, Inc., Cleveland, Ohio. Used by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons, Inc. http://www.yourdictionary.com/surveillance

Surveillance noun

close watch kept over someone, esp. a suspect

constant observation of a place or process

supervision or inspection

Close observation of an individual or group; person or persons under suspicion.

Continuous monitoring of disease occurrence for example.

(military, espionage) Systematic observation of places and people by visual, aural, electronic, photographic or other means.

(law) In criminal law, an investigation process by which police gather evidence about crimes, or suspected crime, through continued observation of persons or places.

SURVEILLANCE IS CAREFUL OBSERVATION

Surveillance is careful observation

noun sur·veil·lance \sər-ˈvā-lən(t)s also -ˈvāl-yən(t)s or -ˈvā-ən(t)s\

: the act of carefully watching someone or something especially in order to prevent or detect a crime

Full Definition of SURVEILLANCE

: close watch kept over someone or something (as by a detective); also : supervision

QUESTIONING SUSPECTS IS NOT SURVEILLANCE

Surveillance is all means of perception except direct questioning and third party testimony

The location of a surveillance may be as open as a public street or as private as a residential structure. Alternatively, surveillance may occur at a place where expectations of only partial privacy would be reasonable, such as a prison. Or the surveillance may be made in circumstances where a substantial portion of privacy has already been voluntarily relinquished, as with unprivileged oral communications delivered to one or more other people, or uttered in premises used by the general public, such as a restaurant. The techniques of surveillance are often purely passive, employed in one of two ways: the data may be perceived by or in the presence of a human agent, or it may be invisibly monitored. Surveillance techniques are usually noncoercive, but they may also involve solicitation, provocation, unconscionable fraud, or even brutal or threatening conduct.

The methods of surveillance can be conveniently divided, according to their impact upon fourth amendment interests, into three categories. The first and third categories are conventional and readily [*1197] described, the middle one is freshly carved and requires somewhat more extensive explanation and analysis. The first category encompasses the deliberate, surreptitious government intrusion into secure space by means of an invisible electronic device that operates without a human counterpart present. While employed for the purpose of gathering incriminating utterances or actions, the device is capable of perceiving innocent behavior as well. This level is immediately recognizable as conventional electronic eavesdropping, including by easy analogy, electronic visual penetration as well. n254 This is, of course, a fourth amendment event requiring full compliance with constitutional warrant strictures. n255 The third category includes casual, spontaneous, and limited field observation. Such ordinary police work must be left to the field discretion of the officer upon the theory that no cognizable interest in privacy insulates the citizen from the very performance in which we all assume our police are normally engaged. Finally, the middle category comprises perceptions of mind-revealing behavior under circumstances where a reduced expectation of security is reasonable.

Questioning suspects is not surveillance

n99. Id. Two agencies responded but stated that they were still in the process of locating and sending their policies. The agencies that did not comply with the FOIA request typically cited to Va. Code Ann. § 2.2-3706(2), which relates to criminal records and does not apply to interrogation related policies, and Va. Code Ann. § 2.2-3705.2(6), which applies in part to "operational, procedural, tactical planning or training manuals, or staff meeting minutes or other records, the disclosure of which would reveal surveillance techniques." Va. Code Ann. §§2.2-3705(6), 2.2-3706(2) (Repl. Vol. 2014). Policies for interviewing and interrogating suspects do not involve "surveillance techniques."