Review of Progress and Prospects



Download 302.56 Kb.
Page5/9
Date29.01.2017
Size302.56 Kb.
#12116
TypeReview
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9

4.2 Capacity building

Participants recognized the need for continuing enhancement of human resource capacities through training.



Opportunities for intervention








Opportunities

Constraints

National

Familiarity with local conditions

Few skilled IM personnel

High turnover in IM professionals

Need for continuous education as technologies change


Regional

Availability of experts in different country

Facilitation of capacity building & training

Ability to derive economies of scale


Few/No IM professionals

Lack of stability in staffing

Need to accommodate variations in national capacities

Training to be provided in appropriate language



International

In-depth accumulated IM expertise

Coordination of international training initiatives

Ability to produce training resource materials


Insufficient resources for face-to-face training globally

Few established networks of IM professionals




Participants identified opportunities and constraints at three levels for capacity building in the management of agricultural science and technology information.
Participants identified the strongest need for capacity building as being in organizations at national and sub-national level, with a continuing requirement to upgrade and refresh technical skills in information management, and to raise awareness to institutional issues amongst decision-makers. Organizations at the regional level were seen to be most effective when acting as facilitators of capacity building and institutional networking at national level, recognizing that they have to manage with limited and unstable resources of their own. Organizations at the international level should exploit their in-depth accumulated expertise in information management to support activities at regional or sub-regional level, rather than intervening directly with national partners. However, a major constraint was identified in terms of the large variation in the capacities, resources, and infrastructure of national organizations, which implied the need for customized approaches. A significant gap was identified in the relative weakness of networks or communities for agricultural information professionals, leaving a clear demand for stronger organizations or associations at international (e.g. International Association of Agricultural Information Specialists - IAALD) or regional (e.g. Inter-American Association of Librarians, Documentalists and Specialists in Agricultural Information - AIBDA) level.
Proposed actions
Generic areas of action in capacity building for implementation in 2005/06 were identified, within which specific actions were highlighted in international or regional contexts.

  1. Institutional support. It was recommended that regional and/or sub/regional fora should become the clearing houses for capacity building initiatives. To facilitate follow-up, it was further proposed that the fora within each (sub-)region map the partners, experiences, resources, and projects to ensure that the key IM/IT players collaborate effectively. It was also agreed that training at all levels should ideally be made in an appropriately supportive institutional context, with adequate screening of trainees, evaluation of the training itself, and follow-up after the training. Examples of regional initiatives discussed during the Consultation were:

    • Eastern & Central Africa – in the Regional Agricultural Information Network (RAIN) by Association for Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa (ASARECA) with support from FAO, GFAR and Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA);

    • Near East & North Africa – in the Association of Agricultural Research Institutions in the Near East and North Africa (AARINENA) network, starting with a national pilot in Egypt under the NARIMS initiative;

    • Caucasus and Central Asia – in the AgroWEB network with support from FAO and GFAR, with follow-up focusing initially on the central Caucasus sub-region;

    • Latin America – through the INFOTEC network of FORAGRO.

  2. Professional association for information specialists. IAALD regional chapters or separate regional associations strengthened to build networks of information professionals, based on the identification of strategic partners in each region and the support from existing chapters or associations.

  3. Training targets and formats. Three main stakeholder groups were identified as requiring training, namely: (i) information specialists on methodologies and tools, and (ii) managers and decision-makers on strategic issues, and (iii) researchers and academics on the use of e-resources and on the dissemination of their outputs. In addition, three formats of training in universities and NARS were identified, which could also be coordinated at (sub-)regional level, namely: (i) continuing education through distance learning; (ii) short-term face-to-face courses; and (iii) formal post-graduate courses towards certification.

  4. Training Resource Materials. Participants highlighted the benefits of two particular capacity building partnerships already in progress where agencies are collaborating at the international level to produce resource materials for distance and face-to-face learning formats. These were the Information Management Resource Kit (IMARK) and ITrain Online. Continuing development of these initiatives was strongly supported, with specific actions identified for 2006:

    • Evaluation of the first IMARK module on “Management of electronic documents” (English version) by independent consultants under the coordination of FAO and CTA by June 2006;

    • Availability of IMARK modules in other languages, specifically Arabic and Russian;

    • Integration of IMARK more explicitly in ITrain Online portal, to be coordinated by FAO, INASP;

    • Promotion and use of ITrain Online as a clearing house for e-learning activities.

Development of such initiatives was seen as the basis for the sustained development of institutional and individual capacities in key aspects of agricultural information management. This approach depends considerably on the catalytic role of the regional and sub-regional fora, and continuing support from the international agencies offering material and financial resources.






Download 302.56 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page