W.P. No. 2015-03-34 Page No. 23 commonalities
and goals with others, organizations stand the best chance of benefiting from workforce diversity.
W.P. No. 2015-03-34 Page No. 24 Future Agenda for Inclusion To a great extent diversity and inclusion practices today are based on intuition and experience rather than empirical evidence. Some organizations in the UK, have come together to create benchmarking tools or some form of standards. For example, there is the Equality
and Human Rights Commission, a government agency, in the UK that promotes and monitors human rights and tries to enforce, through a code of practice and guides, practices for equality and inclusion. There is also a newly
created organization in the UK, called the National Equality Standard (NES) with Microsoft and Cisco among its 20 founding organizations, that attempts to create benchmarks for all legally protected diversity forms and conduct diversity audits. Independent auditors assess each organization that wishes to be audited for diversity. The organizations are in turn provided detailed reports on the extent to which their policies and activities fit with best practices. Diversity and inclusion efforts initiated for feelgood reasons or as a public relations vehicle, or when employers are insincere, may lead to no or negative impact. It is also possible that managerial strategies to promote diversity and inclusion may in fact promote new types
of differences and exclusions, as noted in a qualitative research, which can create unintended consequences of exclusion and one which employees may in fact resist. There is a need to scrutinize the extent to which the rhetoric of diversity and inclusion actually meets reality and the expression of voice among minorities in today‟s organizations. Thus, it is important to ensure that diversity and inclusion efforts are not reduced to tokenism, as perceived by minority group members, and are also seen as fair by others in the organization. It is also important to realize that one size may not fit all. It is important to recognize that dimensions of diversity vary in scope and importance across cultures and organizational leaders need to be aware of them. India is acknowledged to be among the most
diverse countries in the world, and Indians have unconscious competence to manage diversity. To make this competence conscious leaders within India may begin with an examination of the fundamental assumptions underlying the understanding of diversity and inclusion. Issues of exclusion in South Asia for example, revolve highly around gender and involve other complexities of caste, clan and biraderi,
language, income, location, status such as a citizen or migrant, refugee or internally displaced person, etc. Thus,
understanding inclusion