Risk Assessment Oil and Gas


ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT ALGORITHMS - DESCRIPTION OF



Download 361.05 Kb.
View original pdf
Page38/66
Date24.03.2021
Size361.05 Kb.
#56167
1   ...   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   ...   66
OILGAS
ADNOC Toolbox Talk Awareness Material 2020, ADNOC Toolbox Talk Awareness Material 2020, TRA-Installation of Field Instruments, Road Maintenance Plan & Status-Map Format
4.5. ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT ALGORITHMS - DESCRIPTION OF
APPROACH
4.5.1. Problem Formulation
Both sides agreed that the overall problem formulation was: “To develop the oil and gas reserves of the Priobskoye region in an environmentally and economically sound manner.” In meetings with representatives of the oil companies (YUKOS and Amoco) and the Russian environmental authorities the members of the EWG proposed particular issues (including stressors and receptors) that would be addressed in this risk assessment. The group addressed receptors of value (e.g., upland forest, fisheries, migratory animals) and stressors of interest (oil spills, road construction, etc.). Recognizing that it would not be able to address all of the issues, the group chose a subset of stressors and receptors to stimulate further discussion and to illustrate the use of the risk assessment process. Table 1 summarizes the chosen stressors and receptors.


43
Table 1. Stressors and Receptors Chosen for the Study
Stressor
Valued Resources
Fish
Water Quality
Waterfow l
Forest
Road construction x
x x
Pipeline breaks x
x x
Oil spray x
x
Road construction may affect all of the resources through either direct habitat destruction or by indirect effects such as increased ponding, flood alteration, and the release of sediments into the water. Increased sedimentation may degrade water quality by decreasing the amount of light penetrating the water column, filling the interstitial spaces in the gravel of the stream bottom, or directly smothering fish eggs. These actions may directly affect population levels of fish or may affect the habitat of important food resources. Waterfowl may be impacted indirectly through a reduction of food sources or by impairment of their ability to find food because of increases in turbidity.
Pipeline breaks may release large quantities of oil directly into the water if a break occurs at a stream crossing. If a break occurs on land or in a buried section of pipe, impacts will depend on terrain features and whether or not the released oil reaches the water. There are several routes of exposure of waterfowl to the spilled oil. The birds may directly contact the spray and ingest oil while preening their feathers to remove it, or they may be impacted through the ingestion of oil while feeding. Death of the birds may result from direct toxicity of the oil or by secondary effects caused by the loss of body heat because the feathers lose their insulation property. If the oil spill reaches water bodies, fish may be impacted through direct toxicity of the water-soluble fraction of the oil, by impact to the respiratory surfaces of their gills, or indirectly by a reduction in the availability of food. With respect to water quality, severe impacts often occur when heavy equipment is brought in during the cleanup operations and allowed to operate in the stream channel.


44
Oil spray from the production wells and oil/water separators coats the surfaces of the forest trees, inhibiting oxygen transfer and retarding growth. Coating during bud or seed production times is especially harmful. Oil spray may have direct effects on water quality if the oil enters the water directly or is washed off the land surface into the water.

Download 361.05 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   ...   66




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page