Risk Assessment Oil and Gas



Download 361.05 Kb.
View original pdf
Page42/66
Date24.03.2021
Size361.05 Kb.
#56167
1   ...   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   ...   66
OILGAS
ADNOC Toolbox Talk Awareness Material 2020, ADNOC Toolbox Talk Awareness Material 2020, TRA-Installation of Field Instruments, Road Maintenance Plan & Status-Map Format
4.6 MAIN RESULTS
4.6.1 GIS
A composite map of the hydrology, vegetation, and infrastructure GIS layers is shown in
Figure 7. All of the layers cannot be shown on one map and therefore a complete list of GIS
layers is given in Table 2 in Appendix B. The natural conditions and infrastructure layers of the
1:25,000 GIS of Site 1 are shown in Figure 8. The 1:25,000 GIS has much more detail of the oil infrastructure than the Overview GIS including individual wells and buildings. A table of Site 1
coverages and more detailed discussion of the layers is given in Appendix B.
The EWG Oil and Gas subgroup decided that Site 3 was more important than Site 2 from a risk viewpoint because Site 3 will be developed in the near future whereas Site 2 will not be developed for some time. Therefore, the production of the GIS for Site 2 was postponed and the
GIS for Site 3 was completed. The 1:25,000 GIS for the Site 3 GIS is shown in Figure 9. Since
Site 3 is undeveloped at present the oil infrastructure layers are less detailed than for Site 1.
Otherwise, Site 3 has many of the same layers as the Site 1 GIS. A table of Site 3 coverages and a more detailed description of the layers is given in Appendix C.


47
Figure 7


48
Figure 8


49
Figure 9


50

Download 361.05 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   ...   66




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page