Typhoon Moderation Research and Development Office
14 "'4 Quezon Avenue
Quezon City
Institut de mete orologie et d'hydrologie
Sos. Bucuresti-Ploiesti No. 97
Sector 1
Bucarest 18
Servicio Meteorolo/jico Nacional
Ciudad Universitaria
Apartado 235
Madrid
Laboratory for Atmospheric Physics
Federal Institute of Technology
H.P.P. HSnggerberg
G095 Zurich
The Royal Rain Making Research and Development
Institute
(no address given)
Turkish State Meteorological Service
Post Office Box Ho. 401
Ankara
Environmental Modification Office (EMS)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
6010 Executive Boulevard
Rockville, Maryland 20852
Direction de la Meteorologie Nationale
Boite Postale No. 576
Ouagadougou
Federal Hydrometeorological Institute
Bir&aninova 6
Post Office Box 604
11000 Belgrade
726
Copy of Questionnaire Circulated to Receive Information From Members
Member of WMO :
Reporting of activities in the year 19__.
1. Type (purpose) of weather modification activity or project :
2. Approximate size of the project area overall : km 2 .
and of the target area : km 2 .
3. Name and/or reference of project :
4. Location of area in which project is carried out :
5. Year project commenced : 19__.
6. Is it expected to continue during the coming year?
Yes No iNot known
7. Nature of national organization sponsoring project :
Please place X.
Governmental Private
Agriculture
Energy
Forestry ^
Hydrology
Transportation
Other (please specify)
8. Description of weather modification apparatus, modification agents and their
dispersal rates, the techniques employed, etc. (see instructions) .
9. Months of current reporting year during which seeding or other weather
modification activity took place :
10. Number of days during the year on which seeding (or other weather modi-
fication activity) took place:
11. Was a document prepared on the possible effects on the environment of the
weather modification project?
Yes
No
12. Optional remarks :
13. Reporting agency :
(a) Name of reporting agency :
(b) Official title of responsible office :
(c) Postal address :
Signed :
Date:
Please complete and return this questionnaire as soon as possible, and in any
case not later than 15 March 1977, to :
The Secretary-General
World Meteorological Organization
Case Postale No. 5
CH-1211 GENEVA 20
Notes for Completing Report on Weather Modification Activities
weather modification activities which should be included in the register
(1) The seeding or dispersing into clouds or fog of any substance with the
object of altering drop-size distribution, producing ice crystals or the coagulation
of droplets, altering the development of hail or lightning, or influencing in any
way the natural development cycle of clouds or their environment ;
(2) The use of fires or heat sources to influence convective circulation or to
evaporate fog ;
(3) The modification of the solar radiation exchange of the earth or clouds,
through the release of gases, dusts, liquids or aerosols into the atmosphere;
(4) The modification of the characteristics of land or water surfaces by dust-
ing or treating with powders, liquid sprays, dyes, or other materials;
(5) The releasing of electrically charged or radioactive particles, or ions, into
the atmosphere ;
(6) The application of shock waves, sonic energy sources, or other explosive
or acoustic sources to the atmosphere ;
727
(7) The use of aircraft and helicopters to produce downwash for fog dispersal
as well as the use of jet engines and other sources of artificial wind generation ;
(8) The use of lasers or other sources of electromagnetic radiation ;
(9) Any other similar activities falling within the definition of weather
modification.
WEATHER MODIFICATION ACTIVITIES WHICH NEED NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE REGISTER
Activities of a purely local nature, such as the use of lightning deflection or
static discharge devices in aircraft, boats, or buildings, or the use of small heat
sources, fans, fogging devices, aircraft downwash, or sprays to prevent the oc-
currence of frost in tracts or fields planted with crops susceptible to frost or
freeze damage.
Completing the form
One completed copy of this form is requested for each weather modification
activity (hereafter referred to as the project) once per year.
Item 1 — Enter the purpose of the project or activity : e.g. rainfall increase,
hail suppression, cold fog dispersal, etc.
Item 2 — Enter the size (in km 2 ) of the area designated for the project, and
the size of the target area if different (see "Definition", item 4) .
Item 3 — Enter the name and/or reference of project used by the operator. If
the project was reported in the previous Register, please quote the WMO Regis-
ter Number which appears in column 1.
Item 4 — Indicate the location of the weather modification project by geographi-
cal co-ordinates and name of the region.
Item 5 — Enter the year in which the first activities under the present project
took place.
Item 6 — Indicate whether the project is expected to continue in the future.
Item 7 — Indicate the nature of the organization sponsoring the project and
whether it is governmental (including local governments) or private.
Item 8 — Describe the weather modification apparatus, modification agents and
the techniques used. This might include type of ground or airborne apparatus
used, type of modification material dispersed, rate of dispersal in grams per hour
or other appropriate descriptions, and other information such as type of radars,
type of aircraft used, techniques employed (e.g. cloud base seeding at 3,000
m msl), etc.
Item 9 — Enter the months of the year to which the report applies during which
seeding, etc.. was carried out.
Item 12 — This item is to permit the reporting person to include any information
not covered by item 1 through 11 but which he feels is significant or of interest
such as references to published reports describing results of the weather modifi-
cation operation or experiment. Any definite plans for a new project during the
coming year may be outlined under item 12.
Item 13 — Please supply the name and address of agency to which any request
for further information should be directed.
Use a separate sheet of paper if more space is needed.
Definitions
As used in the WMO Register, terms have the following meaning :
Item 1 — Type (purpose) of weather modification activity or project: By proj-
ect is meant a related series of weather modification activities having a common
objective. Will be included any activity performed with the intention of pro-
ducing artificial changes in the composition, behaviour or dynamics of the
atmosphere.
Item 4 — Location of area in which project is carried out : The area referred to
includes both the target area and control area. By target area is meant the
ground area within which the effects of the weather modification activity are
expected to be found, and by control area is meant a preselected, untreated
ground area used for comparison with the target area.
Item 8 — Description of weather modification apparatus, etc. : By weather modi-
fication apparatus is meant any apparatus used with the intention of producing
artificial changes in the composition, behaviour, or dynamics of the atmosphere.
For example : seeding generators, propane devices, flares, rockets, artillery pro-
jectiles, jet engines, etc.
Appendix Q
Report of the World Meteorological Organizatiox/United Na-
tions Environment Program Informal Meeting on Legal Aspects
of Weather Modification
World Meteorological Organization and United Nations Environment
Program, Geneva, November 17 to 21, 1975
1. organization of the meeting
J. I Opening of the meeting
1.1.1 The Chairman, Professor R. List, declared the meeting open at 10 :00
a.m. on Monday 17 November 1975. The list of participants is reproduced in Ap-
pendix A.
1.1.2 Mr. O. M. Ashford, Director of Program Planning and UN Affairs of
the WM() Secretariat, welcomed the participants to the Headcpiarters of WMO on
behalf of the Secretary-General, expressing appreciation to UNEP for having
taken the initiative in arranging the meeting and for providing support to the par-
ticipants. He observed that when the Seventh World Meteorological Congress in
April 1975 decided to launch the Weather Modification Program, this
marked a considerable change in the position of the Organization in this respect
which was in line with the trend to give greater attention to the broad socio-eco-
nomic responsibilities of WMO as a specialized agency of the United Nations.
WMO already collaborated with UNEP in some ten different projects, and the
present meeting where persons from different disciplines could discuss together
topics of common interest was a good example of such collaboration. In conclu-
sion Mr. Ashford gave a special word of thanks to the six experts nominated by
WMO who had agreed to come to present on behalf of the Organization the current
scientific situation in weather modification.
1.1.3 Mr. R. S. Mikhail, Deputy Director of the Division of Geophysics, Global
Pollution and Health of the UNEP Secretariat conveyed the greetings of the Ex-
ecutive Director of UNEP and expressed appreciation to WMO for having orga-
nized the meeting in Geneva and thanked the co-chairman and participants for
having come. He informed the meeting that the Governing Council of UNEP
in March 1975 had agreed that the dialogue between WMO and UNEP on legal
aspects of Weather Modification should continue since it was essential that inter-
national legal principles and guidelines should be considered hand in hand with
the scientific advancement of the subject. Mr. Mikhail expressed the opinion that
if the present state of scientific knowledge in the area of weather modification
was not yet adequate to permit the development of formal legal instruments for
the regulation of activities in this area, it was nevertheless feasible to develop
general principles and operating guidelines as a first step in that direction.
X.% Adoption of tlte agenda
1.2.1 The agenda as adopted as reproduced in Appendix P>. List of supporting
paper* available at the time of the meeting is reproduced in Appendix C.
2. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS SINCE THE THIRD SESSION OF THE WMO EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEE PANEL ON WEATHER MODIFICATION IN NOVEMBER 1974
2.1 Relevant decision 8 of the third session of the Governing Council of T'NEP
2.1.1 The meeting was informed that according to the decisions of the Governing
Council, the strategy of UNEP in respect of the legal aspects of weather modifi-
cation is as follows :
1 ;i ' Consultations will be continued towards development of legal provi-
sions which would define the responsibility of States to ensure that weather
modification experiments and operations within their jurisdiction or control
(728)
729
do not cause damage to the environment of other States or to areas beyond
the limits of national jurisdiction ;
(b) The Executive Director will continue to consult with WMO and other
scientific and legal experts as necessary on the desirability of developing
general principles and operating guidelines on weather modification experi-
ments and operations. He proposes a meeting between scientists and legal ex-
perts to develop such principles and guidelines. The question of calling an in-
tergovernmental meeting to approve such principles and guidelines would be
considered at a later stage, after consensus is reached between scientists and
legal advisers.
2.2 Relevant decisions of the seventh session of Congress and of the twenty-
seventh session of the Executive Committee of WMO
2.2.1 The Weather Modification Program of WMO incorporates as its most im-
portant component a Precipitation Enhancement Project (PEP) which will be
an internationally planned, executed and evaluated experiment in artificial pre-
cipitation stimulation. The meeting was informed that in Resolution 12 (Cg-VII)
Congress had specifically asked the Executive Committee in developing the
plans for PEP to give particular consideration to minimizing any legal liability of
WMO.
2.2.2 The position of the WMO Congress was in accord with that of the UNEP
Governing Council in that international legal principles and guidelines should
be developed hand in hand with the scientific progress in the field of weather mod-
ification. Congress was of the opinion that a better understanding of the physical
basis of weather modification was needed before WMO would be able to provide
definitive advice to Members on this aspect of weather modification experiments
or operations.
2.2.3 The meeting agreed that scientific advancement in general did not pro-
gress smoothly, but was somewhat erratic and even subject to reverses on occa-
sions. It was suggested that over a relatively short time scale the keyword should
perhaps be "in phase" rather than "hand in hand".
2.3 Relevant decisions of the Conference of the Committee on Disarmament
(CCD) of the United Nations
2.3.1 The meeting noted with interest that at the request of the Conference of
the Commitee on Disarmament, some experts had attended an informal meeting
in Geneva in order to provide the Committee with scientific and technical back-
ground information concerning weather modification. Following this scientific
briefing, the representatives of the U.S.A. and the U.S.S.R. had submitted inde-
pendently an identical draft text for a convention on the prohibition of military
or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques. The General
Assembly of the United Nations was currently discussing the report of the CCD
and would indicate the future action to be taken on this draft.
2.3.2 The meeting was also informed that it was proposed to include a limita-
tion on the use of environmental warfare in the protocols to the Geneva Conven-
tions of 1949 now under discussion in a Diplomatic Conference on Humanitarian
Law (Geneva).
3. REVIEW OF THE STATE OF THE ART AND POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENTS
3.1 National laws related to weather modification
3.1.1 Professor Samuels introduced this item and drew attention to some of the
difficulties encountered in obtaining accurate up-to-date information, and in com-
paring different legal systems. After summarizing the principal control tech-
niques and substantive rules as found mainly in the special laws of Australia,
Canada, South Africa, and the United States, he recommended in particular
the establishment of an international register of relevant national legislation
and the development of a model national law comprising certain essentials such
as registration and data reporting for all weather and climate modification
activities.
3.1.2 In the ensuing discussion, reference was made to additional sources of
national law, including the applicable rules contained in water legislation (e.g.,
Peru 1969), in natural resources legislation (e.g. Colombia 1974), and in the
general body of environmental, administrative and civil law (e.g., in the
U.S.S.R.) . It was pointed out that even in those countries where special legisla-
tion had been enacted, a single statutory text normally could not cover all rele-
vant aspects of weather modification.
730
3.1.3 There was general agreement on the desirability of an improved col-
lection and mutual exchange of legislative information, also from an educational
point of view. It was noted with satisfaction that WMO was initiating a register
of weather modification activities and that the questionnaire circulated to Mem-
bers to obtain information for inclusion in the register inquired as to the
existence of laws relating to weather modification activities in the country
concerned. The meeting suggested that WMO Members should be invited to
supply full details of such laws so as to facilitate a complete compilation of
national laws. However, the meeting agreed that indiscriminate transfer of laws
from one country to another was not practicable, but that laws needed to be
adapted to specific requirements of different legal and social systems.
3.1.4 In this connexion, reservations were expressed as to the feasibility of
technical assistance and expert advice by WMO/UNEP to individual states on
legal aspects of weather modification at the present stage of scientific knowledge.
In particular, while legal rules on registration and data reporting were generally
considered as beneficial, premature rules on liability for damage were viewed
as potentially counter-productive.
3.2 The science of weather modification
3.2.1 The meeting agreed that the discussion would be concerned solely with
intentional weather modification.
3.2.2 The meeting had the opportunity to examine the official WMO state-
ment released in 1974 entitled "Present state of knowledge and possible practical
benefits in some fields of weather modification" (see Appendix D) and also the
amplification of this statement which had been prepared for use by the Secretary-
General of WMO.
3.2.3 It was agreed that the statement and its amplification represented the
current state of knowledge in the field of weather modification ; the meeting noted
that the International Commission on Cloud Physics of the International Asso-
ciation of Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics (IAMP) and indicated
satisfaction at the statement and at Weather Modification Programs of WMO.
It was recalled that the Precipitation Enhancement Project of WMO was de-
signed to obtain further scientifically acceptable information concerning the
feasibility of artificial stimulation of precipitation.
3.2.4 The meeting was informed that the role of WMO at the present time in
helping developing countries was to give advice, on request, concerning proposed
weather modification projects and occasionally to provide experts under the
UNDP to visit countries in order to assess the possibilities of artificial precipita-
tion augmentation. It was hoped to arrange courses in weather modification and
to offer fellowships in these courses to a certain number of scientists from
developing countries.
3.2.5 Seventh Congress strongly urged that when a Member country or a
group of Members wished to conduct their own weather modification with the
advice of WMO, a special WMO group of experts be set up to advise on the
planning, implementation and evaluation of the project. The high scientific stat-
ure and independence of such a group would permit it to guide the project along
sound scientific lines and thereby assume the greatest chance of success and
ultimate acceptance of the results by the scientific community. The cost involved
In providing for a WMO group for a special project of this kind would be borne
by the Member or Members concerned.
3.2.6 There was a considerable discussion on the distinction for legal pur-
poses between a weather modification experiment and an operation. It was gen-
erally agreed that in an experiment the major objective was using scientifically
acceptable met bods to obtain information, whereas in an operation the objective
\\a- i.) influence the atmospheric processes so as to produce a desired effect, e.g.
additional rainfall. In the latter case, a scientific evaluation of the intervention
was frequently not made. It was pointed out however that for the purpose of
determination of legal liability the distinction was irrelevant.
■l.i Legal problems facing public and private operators
3.8.1 Professor Samuels introduced this agenda item. He suggested that the
key problem facing operators is tbe legal responsibility they may hear for damage
cans. , i by their activities. He pointed out the difference between legal systems
ae regards tbe type of damage for which compensation may be received, the
111 Of liability and tbe kind of proof required. He also drew attention to
possible Links between an operator's liability and a State's international respon-
sibility in the event of alleged extended area effects.
731
3.3.2 After a general discussion on the state of international environmental
law and on the recourse available in situations involving alleged trans-frontier
damage, the meeting briefly reviewed past experience with court litigation regard-
ing injunctions and liability for damage. Weather modification activities, no
adverse effects of which have been proved on the basis of the present state of
scientific knowledge, were distinguished from other activities involving pollution
and other harmful effects ; the view was expressed that the development of new
beneficial technology should not be constrained unduly by "Punitive" legal sanc-
tions. Instead, the preventive function of administrative law was emphasized,
especially in the field of licensing procedures and mandatory environmental
impact assessment.
3.3.3 There followed a discussion on the practices of, and available controls
over, private operators engaged in weather modification abroad, especially in
developing countries. The meeting was informed of the 1973 recommendations
of the WMO Commission for Atmospheric Sciences, which advised governments
to seek advice from WMO on this subject and of the consequent decision of the
WMO Seventh Congress authorizing the Secretary-General to establish on re-
quest a special WMO group of experts to advise on the planning, implementation
and evaluation of projects where the costs involved will be borne by the Mem-
ber (s) concerned. (See paragraph 3.2.5 above.)
Share with your friends: |