ref·u·gee ( P ) Pronunciation Key (rfy-j) n.
One who flees in search of refuge, as in times of war, political oppression, or religious persecution.
[French réfugié, from past participle of réfugier, to take refuge, from Old French, from refuge, refuge. See refuge.]
: an individual seeking refuge or asylum; especially : an individual who has left his or her native country and is unwilling or unable to return to it because of persecution or fear of persecution (as because of race, religion,
Source: Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law, © 1996 Merriam-Webster, Inc.
From : Christine A. Bevc
For those of you who are less active on the list and concerned about the traffic into your inbox...
I hope this will help some of you.
Christine A. Bevc
But it does make an interesting point for scientific inquiry.
> to recite the corresponding practitioner perspective on the same issues.
For post-disaster shelter, see http://www.shelterlibrary.org especially the guidelines 'Transitional Settlement: Displaced Populations' http://www.sheltercentre.org/shelterlibrary/publications/112.htm along with "Shelter After Disaster" http://www.sheltercentre.org/shelterlibrary/publications/172.htm Both documents are the practitioner perspective. They were based on field experience and were written and published by practitioners for practitioners (who have published academically too).
For pets and disasters, useful practitioner starting points would be http://www.ussartf.org/pets_and_disasters.htm and http://www.redcross.org/services/disaster/beprepared/animalsafety.html and http://www.fema.gov/kids/pets.htm Sebastian Heath's excellent work http://www.worldvet.org/displayarticle665.html is mainly from a practitioner perspective, but he has published extensively academically.
Under international law, "refugee" has a specific legal definition spelled out clearly in the 1951 Convention and 1967 Protocol which is at
http://www.unhcr.ch/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/home?page=PROTECT&id=3c0762ea4 Because of IDPs, EDPs, moving country boundaries, "environmental refugees", and emergencies with combined causes, the lines between refugees and non-refugees are being blurred and are causing problems in international law and disaster response. UNHCR, for example, has ended up working outside of its mandate and outside of international law, yet with an international mandate and support.
Reply-To : kshoaf@ucla.edu
Sent : September 2, 2005 8:00:41 PM
To : o681j@unb.ca, disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu
Subject : RE: Katrina
I usually just lurk online, but thought it time to chime in on the "refugee" term. The term refugee has legal implications from the standpoint of international relief organizations and the United Nations. A refugee from a legal point of view is defined by the UN High Commission on Refugees and is someone who displaced across international borders (the reason can be political or otherwise i.e. related to natural disaster). Those who are refugees have legal rights and the United Nations has responsibilities to provide for them and protect them. The International Red Cross abides by these rules as well. Those who are displaced due to natural disaster or conflict, but do not cross international borders are referred to as "internally displaced populations". They have less rights and do not receive services from the United Nations.
As far as those in the US are concerned, I don't think we are yet asking for UN assistance so the terminology is probably not of legal consequence. However, I tend to believe that being accurate in our language use is important.
Kim
From : Susan Weiler
Reply-To : weilercs@whitman.edu
Sent : September 2, 2005 8:13:50 PM
To : mmessina@co.iredell.nc.us
CC :
Subject : Re: Katrina
from Merriam Webster on-line dictionary:
Main Entry: ref·u·gee
Pronunciation: "re-fyu-'jE, 're-fyu-"
Function: noun
Etymology: French réfugié, past participle of (se) réfugier to take refuge, from Latin refugium
: one that flees; especially : a person who flees to a foreign country or power to escape danger or persecution
- ref·u·gee·ism /-"i-z&m/ noun
Main Entry: evac·u·ee
Pronunciation: i-"va-ky&-'wE
Function: noun
: an evacuated person
Main Entry: evac·u·ate
Pronunciation: i-'va-ky&-"wAt
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): -at·ed; -at·ing
Etymology: Middle English, to draw off morbid humors, from Latin evacuatus, past participle of evacuare to empty, from e- + vacuus empty
transitive senses
1 : to remove the contents of : EMPTY
2 : to discharge from the body as waste : VOID
3 : to remove something (as gas or water) from especially by pumping
4 a : to remove especially from a military zone or dangerous area b : to withdraw from military occupation of c : VACATE
intransitive senses
1 : to withdraw from a place in an organized way especially for protection
2 : to pass urine or feces from the body
- evac·u·a·tive /-"wA-tiv/ adjective
From :
Reply-To : Nikola.Garber@noaa.gov
Sent : September 2, 2005 8:40:46 PM
To : cstalber@mitigation.com
CC : disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu
Subject : NOAA photos of devastated areas.
Hi all,
for those of you looking for photos of the devastated areas...
NOAA has done numerous overflight photos in the past few days with more photos yet to be posted.
Check out http://ngs.woc.noaa.gov/katrina/
Make sure and "Click here for imagery. " under the index maps photo...this will give you the entire coast and boxes to click on in areas you want to view and not make you download all the photos.
You can zoom in and the photos are clear.
- Kola
From : jerichob@juno.com
Reply-To : jerichob@juno.com
Sent : September 2, 2005 8:43:14 PM
To : disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu
Subject : Re: definition of refugee
Apparently there has been some commentary on the use of the term "refugee" on NPR; it is apparently being perceived as racist by some, and as politicizing the situation in an unhelpful way. It would be interesting to know if at the moment "refugee" is just being used by CNN and network reporters, or if, as Mauro wondered, government agencies and other responding agencies are also using it. The "refugees" might now not care what they are labeled, but their predicament could go on for months, and it may have a very real impact on how they are treated. It's unlikely they'll fall under the purview of the UNHCR, for example, but will "refugees" warrant more sustained assistance or differentkinds of assistance than, say, "hurricane survivors" would? Labeling can have very real political and economic consequences; there's been quite a lot of work on this in development studies, and I would imagine in disaster studies as well.
Something television reporters aren't aware of, but! perhaps will be after this.
Jericho Burg
Department of Communication
University of California
From : Darlington Jo D
Reply-To : jdd4556@louisiana.edu
Sent : September 2, 2005 9:45:03 PM
To : disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu
Subject : looting and disasters
This point may have already been made, so I apologize in advance if this is a repeat.
Quarantelli's work concerning the issue of looting was in reference to a "natural" disaster. As far as I know, there has been no reports of looting in Mississippi and Alabama. The levee failure in New Orleans, where
looting has occurred is not a natural disaster. The levee failure is a technological aka manmade disaster. I think it follows the pattern established in the literature. Looting seldom occurs as a response to natural disasters, but is known to occur following technological disasters....
just my thoughts....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jo Darlington
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology and Anthropology
University of Louisiana@Lafayette
Lafayette, LA 70504
Phone: 337-482-6067
email: jdd4556@louisiana.edu
From : Runte, Eduardo Frederico Augusto
Reply-To : o681j@unb.ca
Sent : September 2, 2005 10:30:56 PM
To : jdd4556@louisiana.edu
CC : disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu
Subject : Re: looting and disasters
Hello,
This is true - Quarantelli is quite clear when reporting that his conclusions derive mostly from "natural" disasters. He also makes the point that he is talking about "widespread" looting. However, if you take a look at Drabek's "Human System Responses to Disaster", he says:
"Despite the influx of non-victims into disaster areas, researchers repeatedly have documented an absence of looting behavior. This pertains both to the immediate emergency period and, as we will see in the next chapter, to the early stages of recovery, except under highly specialized circumstances. (...) No doubt some looting behavior occurs, but it is minimal at worst and entirely nonexistent, at best." (pages 145-146)
He then presents two quotes from the literature, one relating to a "technological" disaster (plane crash) and a "natural" one (tornado).
If you look at Fischer's "Response to disaster: Facts versus fiction & its perpetuation", looting is dismissed as "rare or nonexistent", but (as far as I can remember from the book), there is no warning that most of the research was done natural disasters - it is easy (though naive) to conclude that looting never occurs, or that it will never be widespread.
If we accept that looting is more common in technological disasters than in natural ones, there remains a key question - did people perceive (and thus responded to it) the disaster as a technological or a natural one?
Also, if the disaster (or catastrophe) in New Orleans is "classified" as a technological disaster, there may be impacts on how the insurance industry will deal with it.
Eduardo.
--
Eduardo Frederico Augusto Runte
MA Candidate - Department of Sociology
University of New Brunswick
ICQ: 31826219
MSN: efarunte@hotmail.com
From : Ezra Boyd
Sent : September 3, 2005 5:23:40 AM
To : tonyreic@cox.net, Laurie.Ure@turner.com, disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu, S.N.Jonkman@dww.rws.minvenw.nl, ilan_kelman@hotmail.com
Subject : Katrina -- Local Perspective
CONSERVE GAS!
Expect search and rescue to continue for sometime. I have seen little coverage of the Bywater/Ninth Ward, New Orleans East, St. Bernard Parish, Plaquemines Parish. These areas were hit hard. Local radio aired official from St. Bernard who said FEMA has not contacted them, much less physically reached them. Search and rescue could continue for weeks.
Civil unrest has spread. Though isolated in comparision, looting has been observed in Baton Rouge and St. Bernard. Slidell, La is likely next.
This nation must provide immediate housing for 1 million citizens. Technically, they are internally displaced persons. But, they are also people in need of immediate refuge and they are poor and destitute. Please urge everyone, especially those in southeast, to be compassionate and patient.
disaster_grads list master: please remove me temporarly from the listserve.
Everyone: Please do not email me unless you are in a position to provide immediate relief.
Bas and Ilan: I will refer all questions about flood fatality research to you two.
There are many unsung heros. Local radio aired a caller from the ninth ward who said he was 5'8" and that the water in front of his house was 6'. Every morning he swims as much water as he can carry to elderly trapped in his neighborhood.
Today is my birthday, and I drove around giving drinking water to thirsty people.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ezra Boyd
Graduate Research Assistant
Center for the Study of the Public Health Impacts of Hurricanes
Suite 3221 CEBA Bldg.
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
(225) 578-7694
ezra@hurricane.lsu.edu
From : Fred Dilger
Reply-To : fcd5@cox.net
Sent : September 3, 2005 4:17:17 PM
To :
Subject : Katrina and risk assessment
Hello,
I hate to add to the discussion. The deadeningly silly news coverage has now turned to oil refining. The real problem will be the increase in world food costs-something like 70% of the world’s feed grain used to stage near New Orleans before passing overseas and now can’t for a long time-the US grain harvest may be stuck.
I’d like to make a different point. What does this mean for the use of risk assessment?
Others have pointed out that the risks were well known for a long time. These risk were communicated, and obvious to anyone traveling there-when your hotel lobby is thirty feet below the river’s level, you know something is wrong.
The problem is that the risks were not acted on. The question is will this change how risk assessment is done? Nuclear power plants used to be constructed with a huge containment vessel over them to prevent the spread of radiation in the event of a “worst-case scenario”. Then it changed to “risk-based” design which dramatically reduced costs and did away with a lot of protections based on the probability of a severe event occurring. My question is: Does risk assessment work? Which is a better course of action: 1) to produce technically credible assessments of risk that are not used or 2) a worst-case scenario that attracts attention but is dismissed as crazy or too expensive and then not acted on. I’ve done both. It’s an urgent question because DHS is changing to a “risk-based” system for awarding grant funds.
In 1994, I got to witness ex-Gov. Edwin “Silver Zipper” Edwards address an NCSL meeting and joke that he was not able to own property in the state he had been Governor of because of his felony convictions. This area has a long history of bad governance and I think more will come out. Note that Florida, Alabama, and Mississippi did not have similar problems
Based on what I’ve learned so far, communications was the Achilles Heel that hampered decision making and assessment. Same as 9/11. The cell phone repeaters were on the twin towers and when they went, the communication failed. The same thing happened here, because the phone service went down.
Ultimately the best solution will be to deploy and subsidize a satellite telephone system, like the Iridium system that went bankrupt. But then we’ll have to worry about solar storms.
The best, most humane mitigation action I’ve heard was suggested by my colleague David Ballard at Cal State Northridge. He said that the authorities should have issued Social Security, Welfare and Adoption and Foster Care payments before the end of the month so that many of these people would have the money to leave. A wrinkle could have been to make them collect the money in person and shuttle them onto evacuation buses at the same time.
Fred C. Dilger PhD.
(702) 290-6990
From : Dave Johnson
Reply-To : djost3+@pitt.edu
Sent : September 3, 2005 6:22:45 PM
To : disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu
Subject : RE: Katrina and risk assessment
An excellent point. Risk assessment has always been the basis on which the rest of the emergency management strategies were based. The move to a risk-based policy is not a bad thing IF the range of risk is addressed. As with most issues it comes down to where the money is best spent based on how comfortable you are in rolling the risk dice. In the case of NO it obviously came up snake eyes. We can have redundant systems and hardended system but where do you draw the line? Consider not only the initial cost but also the long term, and often more expensvie costs of on-going maintenance. Undoubtedly mitigation is the more cost-effective but how much and where. These are complex, interdependent systems with a potential for both localized and cascading failure. Both concerns have to be addressed. There are no easy answers but that is why we took on this challenge in association with the practicing EMs. The big road block, in my opinion, is implementation. As Dr. Dilger points out the ultimate linchpins are the politicians that have to vote to implement wisely and not for the action that makes the most press.
I really like the idea of passing out the checks and boarding passes at the same time. I'll have to keep that idea in the mental tool box.
David "DJ" Johnson, PhD candidate
University of Pittsburgh, GSPIA/
Allegheny Co Emergency Services
From :
Sent : September 3, 2005 7:32:46 PM
To : ezra@hurricane.lsu.edu, tonyreic@cox.net, Laurie.Ure@turner.com, disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu, S.N.Jonkman@dww.rws.minvenw.nl, ilan_kelman@hotmail.com
CC : Patricia.Stepken@dhs.gov
Subject : Re: Katrina -- Local Perspective
Hi Ezra and All
As a member of the grad list, a disaster researcher, a previous FEMA caseworker, and a person born and raised in the heart of uptown New Orleans, I am writing to get the word out that if you apply for FEMA assistance please leave contact information and mailing addresses that can be utilized. There is no way to cal New Orleans as of yet. My mother is the youngest of fourteen children born in New Orleans. We have set up a line of communication and also are using contact information from Houston to get Temporary housing monies to our loved ones. If you know what hotels your family members are staying at, get their addresses and make sure you can contact them via telephone. Also know that if your family is moving from a hotel to a temporary house or apartment make sure you get the address to forward mail. Develop a daily call time so that you can update with the families. FEMA's biggest problem is going to be trying to contact applicant's directly. If there is a person who does have stable phone service, use that number. Mostly understand that the FEMA representatives, many of which here in Denton are my friends and family also are working 12 hour shifts taking sometimes fifteen applications or more on one call, are doing their best to get the information and move through the constant queue lights on the walls reminding them for every call they take 500 more are waiting.
peace,
patricia stukes
University of North Texas
Adjunct Instructor Women's Studies
Texas Woman's University
Doctoral Student Sociology and Women's Studies GTA
Alpha Kappa Delta Treasurer, TWU Chapter
email jusbcas@aol.com (or) jusbcas@twu.edu
"...within the war we are all waging with the forces of death, subtle and otherwise, conscious or not - I am not only a casualty, I am also a warrior." - Audre Lorde
"We have to consciously study how to be tender with each other until it becomes a habit because what was native has been stolen from us, the love of Black women for each other." -Audre Lorde, "Eye to Eye"
"It is easy to be friendly to ones friends. But to befriend the one who regards [themselves] as your enemy is the quintessence of true religion." -Mahatma Gandhi
"This is my simple religion. There is no need for temples; no need for complicated philosophy. Our own brain, our own heart is our temple; the philosophy is kindness."
Dalai Lama
From : Christine M. Rodrigue, Ph.D.
Reply-To : rodrigue@jps.net
Sent : September 4, 2005 3:45:43 AM
To : disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu
Subject : [Fwd: History Repeats Itself]
The parallels are depressing. Chrys Rodrigue
From: Bob Mason
To: "Christine M. Rodrigue, Ph.D."
Subject: History Repeats Itself
Sent: September 3, 2005 7:14:05 PM
Chrys:
http://billmon.org/archives/002123.html
Bob
From : Christian Stalberg
Reply-To : cstalber@mitigation.com
Sent : September 4, 2005 11:51:35 AM
To : ,
Subject : Racism is at the Heart of the Katrina Disaster
I realize this is a provocative news article but I wanted to share it with the list as it touches on a number of issues of interest that I hope will precipitate discussion. - Christian
Racism is at the Heart of the Katrina Disaster
By Joel Wendland, Political Affirs magazine
9-03-05
"I hate the way they portray us," said hip-hop star Kanye West Friday evening on a NBC telethon to raise money for the Red Cross relief efforts for victims of Hurricane Katrina. "They show a white family and they say they are looking for food. They show a Black family and say we’re looters."
West discarded his scripted for the show and denounced a race-divided society and the Bush administration for failing to provide adequate, effective, and timely relief and aid going into the sixth day of the hurricane disaster for the predominantly Black city of New Orleans. West further criticized the "shoot-to-kill" order handed down by Louisiana officials. NBC censored his remarks directly mentioning the Bush administration.
New Orleans is two-thirds Black and 28 percent white.
So is racism the motivation that drove Bush to target the city’s anti-flooding projects for funding cuts in order to pay for his tax cuts for the rich and his war in Iraq that has, in the view of most people, failed to make the world safer?
The answer is most certainly yes.
Despite President Bush’s ability to grin and joke at two public appearances in the six days since the hurricane disaster began, early estimates indicate that Katrina may be the worst natural disaster in our history.
But, as has been reported in the major news media, it was not a surprise. Experts have been warning for years of the catastrophe that a category 4 or 5 hurricane could cause on the Gulf Coast. In Louisiana, specifically, local
officials fought for, begged for, and demanded federal funding to implement hurricane defense plans that could have avoided the widespread flooding of New Orleans.
But the Bush administration has continuously slashed funding for those projects. Robert Hartwig, chief economist for the Insurance Information Institute, was quoted early last week in Newhouse News Service as saying, "It’s going to be very evident that there were an enormous number of vulnerabilities that weren’t addressed."
Toby Chaudhuri, communications director for the Campaign for America’s Future, said, "This is a very hard time for many of us, but we can’t forget that while the hurricane was an accident, the tragedy and horror were allowed to happen. It was not a surprise."
Since 2001, key federal disaster mitigation programs, including FEMA’s Project Impact, a model mitigation program created by the Clinton administration, have been cut or canceled outright. Cuts in federal funding for these programs have pushed communities across the country to compete for scarce pre-disaster mitigation dollars.
In 2003, the Republican-controlled Congress approved a White House proposal to cut FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) in half.
For Louisiana directly, Bush rejected pleas from the state’s congressional delegation urging Congress earlier this year to dedicate a stream of federal money to Louisiana’s coast. Ultimately a deal worth $540 million to the state over four years was agreed to, but it was far short of the needed estimate of $14 billion. In its 2005 budget, the Bush administration proposed only $10.4 million in funding, a sixth of what local officials say they needed, for southeast Louisiana’s chief hurricane protection project.
Bush’s 2006 budget proposal cuts funding for the Army Corps of Engineers, the entity that has helped build much of the levee system in New Orleans and proposed major renovations in 2004 and early 2005 for which it couldn’t scrounge up the funds. These proposed cuts come after Bush’s 2005 budget proposal called for a 13 percent reduction in the Army Corps of Engineers budget, down to $4 billion from $4.6 billion in fiscal 2004.
"I’ve been here over 30 years and I’ve never seen this level of reduction," Al Naomi, project manager for the New Orleans district of the US Army Corps of Engineers, told the local papers prior to this year’s hurricane season.
"Money is so tight the New Orleans district instituted a hiring freeze. The freeze is the first of its kind in about 10 years," said Marcia Demma, chief of the Corps’ Programs Management Branch last June.
"I think it’s extremely shortsighted," Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu (D) warned at the beginning of the summer. "When the Corps of Engineers’ budget is cut, Louisiana bleeds. These projects are literally life-and-death projects to the people of south Louisiana and they are (of) vital economic interest to the entire nation."
The Bush administration’s shift in concern to the "war on terrorism" and its war on Iraq have forced states to shoulder more of the responsibility to provide support for natural disasters and emergencies. Unfortunately, state budget shortfalls, fueled by cuts in direct grants to states on many levels, have meant fewer dollars for emergency management programs. In fiscal year 2004, the average budget for a state emergency management agency was $40.8 million, a 23 percent reduction from fiscal year 2003.
In an effort that showed the President’s personal lack of concern for natural disaster preparedness, Bush called for cutting the federal percentage of large-scale natural disaster preparedness expenditures from 75 percent of such costs, with states and municipalities funding the other 25 percent, to a 50 percent federal responsibility.
For Louisiana directly, Bush rejected pleas from the state’s congressional delegation urged Congress earlier this year to dedicate a stream of federal money to Louisiana’s coast. Ultimately a deal was struck to steer $540 million to the state over four years, far short of the needed estimated of $14 billion. In its budget, the Bush administration also proposed only $10.4 million in funding, a sixth of what local officials say they needed for southeast Louisiana’s chief hurricane protection project.
Last September, Terry Tullier, the New Orleans emergency preparedness director, expressed anger at learning that a federally funded study to determine ways to protect the region from a Category 5 hurricane has been shelved. "I’m all for the war effort, but every time I think about the $87 billion being spent on rebuilding Iraq, I ask: What about us?" he told New Orleans’ Time-Picayune.
He later warned that a major hurricane would have wide repercussions. "We are so critical that if it hits the fan in New Orleans, everything this side of the Rockies will feel the economic shock waves."
Rev. Jesse Jackson, in a statement released yesterday, remarked, "Homeland security means more than removing people’s shoes at the airport. It means making sure that our levees, our dams, our bridges, our roads, our ports and rails are all safe. Unfortunately, the tax cuts for the rich and the billions wasted on an unnecessary war in Iraq have devastated our public infrastructure, forcing cuts at every level—including levee protection and maintenance."
"The tragedy of Hurricane Katrina points to the problems of long-term divestment in our infrastructure and our communities," said Greg Speeter, executive director of the National Priorities Project. "At the same time, the federal government has found $205 billion to fund the Iraq War. In comparison, money required for necessary infrastructure development looks like peanuts."
Disaster epxerts also expressed concern over deep cuts adopted by Bush and the Republican Congress to the Southeast Louisiana Urban Flood Control Project (SELA). SELA’s budget was slashed from $36.5 million awarded in 2005 to $10.4 million suggested for 2006 by congressional Republicans and the president. Likewise, $35 million in projects to build and improve levees identified by the Army Corps of Engineers in New Orleans simply went unfunded.
Last March, Senator Landrieu warned that budget cuts for these projects could have dire consequences. "We could have lost 100,000 lives had Hurricane Ivan hit the mouth of the (Mississippi) River," said Landrieu.
"God has been good, but one of these days a hurricane is going to come and, if we don’t get projects finished, were sitting ducks."
National Guard resources and personnel needed for disaster relief stuck in Iraq prompted sharp criticism from National Guard officials and many politicians. "Missing the personnel is the big thing in this particular event. We need our people," Lt. Andy Thaggard told the Washington Post. Thaggard is a spokesperson for the Mississippi National Guard, which has a brigade of more than 4,000 troops in central Iraq. Louisiana also has about 3,000 Guard troops in Baghdad.
In addition to personnel shortages, National Guard officials have complained of equipment shortages. To equip troops in Iraq, according to a report in the Detroit Free Press, the Pentagon stripped local Guard units of about
24,000 pieces of equipment. That has left Guard units at home, already seriously short of gear.
Since the results of this disaster, many state officials fear that continued occupation of Iraq will negatively impact on National Guard recruitment and leaves their states unprotected against natural disasters and forest fires.
This situation even generated criticism from Republican ranks. Rep. Matt Foley (R-FL) called for the return of Florida’s National Guard contingent from Iraq to aid in ongoing disaster relief operations their and to bolster disaster prevention measures.
According to National Priorities Project estimates, Louisiana taxpayers will pay $1.7 billion for what Congress has allocated so far for the Iraq War, Mississippi will pay $919 million, and Alabama will pay $1.9 billion. These
amounts easily could have funded not only an array of social programs in these three states, but could have rebuilt and strengthened the levee system around New Orleans.
For Bush’s racist politics of cutting needed funds in Louisiana to pay for tax cuts for the rich and a war for oil, tens of thousands are suffering. It is a crime that cries out for justice.
From : Courtney Flint
Reply-To : cflint@uiuc.edu
Sent : September 4, 2005 1:13:26 PM
To : disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu
Subject : katrina
My initial message posted to the list was intended to initiate dialogue. To a certain extent, that has happened
and I thank those from all perspectives for contributing. I still stand by my original remark - that I hoped we might be able to assemble "a collective set of ideas about what went horribly wrong in managing this event, where we go from here, and how the disaster field of practitioners and researchers can respond." In some ways we have initiated this kind of discussion, but I suspect we are all reeling from the circumstances and emotional responses are not surprising.
I can't imagine that anyone in Louisiana (or the other affected Gulf States perhaps) would say that things did not
go horribly wrong when basic lifesustaining elements took days to arrive (water as a prime example) and known risks were left unmitigated. We will probably see a debate about all of this for years to come. Conflict can be a critical part of constructive dialogue as long as we maintain an ethical framework.
One way in which I think we as disaster researchers have done a disservice is to continue to oversimplify the
distinction between "natural" and "technological" hazards/disasters. We are continually reminded that these
boundaries are so blurry. Responses and experiences are influenced by an array of social and institutional
vulnerabilities and capacities that go far beyond initial hazard agents. The best we might offer is our ability to
critically evaluate what went wrong, what went right, and incorporate complex factors into our assessments and
strategies.
Courtney G. Flint
Univ of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Dept of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences
1023 Plant Sciences Laboratory
1201 South Dorner Drive
Urbana, IL 61801-4778
Telephone: 217-244-1840
Fax: 217-244-3469
Cell: 217-714-6012
EMail: cflint@uiuc.edu
From : Ilan Kelman
Sent : September 4, 2005 2:18:35 PM
To : cflint@uiuc.edu
Subject : RE: katrina
Dear Courtney,
Wonderful message! Keep up the good work and keep pushing on these issues.
Ilan
From : kelly fitzgerald
Reply-To : kellyfitzgerald@hotmail.com
Sent : September 4, 2005 7:28:02 PM
To : disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu
Subject : Request for Assistance--Research on Older Disaster Victims (Katrina)
Dear all-
I am a gerontology doctoral candidate and also a Red Cross Disaster Team member. I will be deploying very shortly with the Red Cross to the Gulf Coast working most likely in a shelter or mass feeding. While I am down there I would like to use this time to learn more about older victims, and use what I learn as part of my dissertation. Is there anyone out there that is interested in this topic who would be willing to assist, guide, or work with me in any capacity in preparing and collecting data? I know this request sounds very vague, but I have a few research questions in mind and will communicate those to anyone who responds to me directly at kellyfitzgerald@hotmail.com.
Best regards,
Kelly Fitzgerald, MPA, MS, PhD Candidate
University of Massachusetts Boston
Gerontology Center
Boston, MA
From : Vernee Ross
Reply-To : simplicity1020@yahoo.com
Sent : September 4, 2005 8:06:57 PM
To : disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu
Subject : disaster email
Hello all. The discussion and comments are great but my email is flooded with too many emails (no pun intended). Please send all emails dealing with Katrina or any other future disasters to drcintern05@yahoo.com. Thanx for your cooperation.
"I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, bears much fruit; for without Me you can do nothing" (John 15:5).
From : Yang Zhang
Reply-To : zhangy@neo.tamu.edu
Sent : September 5, 2005 5:28:48 PM
To : , ,
CC : , , "Baoliang Liu"
Subject : The New Planner Doctoral Students Forum for Hurricane Katrina
Dear Everybody,
Please visit www.newplanner.org to see our efforts to help the victims of Hurricane Katrina. For researchers, we finished a Vulnerability Analysis of the city of New Orleans. You can also find the slides on our website home page.
The New Planners Doctoral Students Forum urges the planning students all over the world make their contribution to the victims of this devastating natural disaster.
Thank you for your generosity.
Sincerely,
The New Planner Doctoral Student Forum
Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning
Texas A&M University
*********************************************************************************
Yang Zhang
Ph.D. Candidate
Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center
Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning
Texas A&M University
College Station, TX 77843-3137
Email: zhangy@neo.tamu.edu
Phone: 979-845-1010
Fax: 979-845-5121
**********************************************************************************
From : Runte, Eduardo Frederico Augusto
Reply-To : o681j@unb.ca
Sent : September 6, 2005 3:40:37 PM
To : disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu
Subject : Looting video
Hello everyone,
I don't know how relevant this might be, but here's the link:
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/31299/should_hurricane_katrina_looters_be_tolerated/
Eduardo.
--
Eduardo Frederico Augusto Runte
MA Candidate - Department of Sociology
University of New Brunswick
ICQ: 31826219
MSN: efarunte@hotmail.com
From : Jason Kingsley
Reply-To : kingsley911@yahoo.com
Sent : September 6, 2005 4:27:16 PM
To : disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu
Subject : Re: Looting video
I'm not able to see the video because my computer
doesn't have the software, but from the rather
obnoxious rants below it on that screen, it seems
police were filmed coming out of a Wal-Mart with
items. Depending on what the items were (if it can be
told for certain), this may be completely legitimate.
During the Ft. Collins flood in Colorado a few years
ago, police broke in to a sporting goods store and
took a great many items. These included a raft,
climbing rope and other gear used to assist in the
rescue effort. Again, I can't tell what the police
are taking, but I would be careful to immediately jump
on it as looting until I knew for certain what the
materials were being taken for. At the end of the
disaster, Ft. Collins was responsible for returning or
paying for the items, and did so. This information is
per a staff officer with that department.
Jason Kingsley, CEM
Region VIII President
International Association of Emergency Managers
From : Susan Weiler
Reply-To : weilercs@whitman.edu
Sent : September 6, 2005 4:12:04 PM
To : disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu
Subject : Teachers and Schools
Dear all,
It is clear that a crisis in education is emerging -- this field is new to me-I wonder if you have any answers--
With all the educational dislocation, has there been any attempt to mobilize graduate students and even college students to teach classes, or shift college students to other universities -- on a massive scale. Expand, the Americorps, work through the churches, etc. etc. to get students through this year? It seems to me it would be a tremendous leaning experience for everyone involved. If we can't all pull together now, after something like this, when can we?
Thanks you.
Sue Weiler
From :
Reply-To : meredithmoss@aol.com
Sent : September 6, 2005 4:50:18 PM
To : weilercs@whitman.edu, disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu
Subject : Re: Teachers and Schools
Higher education has been working on this issue. University of Richmond has announced the following:
"The University of Richmond has accepted, tuition-free for the fall semester, a number of undergraduate and law students dislocated from colleges and universities in the area devastated by Hurricane Katrina. The spots available for the fall semester have been filled. The University wishes it could do more, but capacity is limited by class space available. If stricken schools are not able to reopen in the spring, their students may apply for regular admission to Richmond for the spring semester, which begins in January 2006. The University will have time to plan for increased housing and course availability for spring semester and will accommodate as many mid-year admissions as feasible. Students who are admitted mid-year will have regular full-time student status and thus be eligible to apply for financial aid to meet the cost of tuition, fees, room and board."
Meredith Moss
Disaster Science Graduate Program
University of Richmond
From : Runte, Eduardo Frederico Augusto
Reply-To : o681j@unb.ca
Sent : September 6, 2005 4:51:47 PM
To : disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu
CC : kingsley911@yahoo.com
Subject : Re: Looting video
Hello,
I understand what you mean, and yes, if they were taking material for use in the
emergency, that would be understandable. However, apparently they were taking
shoes
(but they could be waterproof boots!), and there was no sense of urgency, but
rather a
sense of embarassment.
Further, when asked about what they were doing there, one of the police officers
(I'm
trusting that they were police officers and not private security) said they were
looking for looters - perhaps they were just keeping an eye on things and make
sure
there was no violence. After all, it wouldn't make much sense to try to stop the
looting in the store, when all resources had to be put to the task of saving
lives.
Eduardo.
--
Eduardo Frederico Augusto Runte
MA Candidate - Department of Sociology
University of New Brunswick
ICQ: 31826219
MSN: efarunte@hotmail.com
From :
Reply-To : Keakaha@aol.com
Sent : September 6, 2005 5:16:09 PM
To : disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu
Subject : Re: Teachers and Schools
I'm a student at Lewis and Clark Law School here in Portland, Oregon. Both the Law School and the main College have accepted students displaced by the disaster, primarily local (Oregon, SW Washington) students who were planning to attend comparable schools in the areas devastated. My understanding is that those students are meant to pay tuition to their 'intended' schools rather than to Lewis and Clark, credits will be transferable, and they should return to their 'intended' schools once those schools are up and running. L&C is just one of a a network of colleges and universities working together for displaced students.
Jessica Spiegel
Law Student
Lewis and Clark Law School
From : Valarie Olyniec
Reply-To : valleyvan@adelphia.net
Sent : September 6, 2005 6:24:13 PM
To : ,
Subject : RE: Teachers and Schools
Although I can’t speak for the universities in the area, the Washington Post stated that the University of Washington D.C. was taking students affected by the disaster.
Valarie Olyniec, BSN, RN
Touro University Student
Disaster and Emergency Managment
From : RaEsa Benjamin-Wardle
Reply-To : rbenjam1@ithaca.edu
Sent : September 6, 2005 6:49:06 PM
To : weilercs@whitman.edu
CC : disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu
Subject : Re: Teachers and Schools
HI there,
I'm an undergraduate student at Ithaca College in NY. A large group of us
are wondering what we can do to help out fellow college students effected
by the hurricane. One of volunteer organizations has invited the campus
to meet Thursday to brainstorm and discuss possibilties. Any ideas?
RaEsa
DRC Summer REU student
Ithaca College
Psychology/Sociology
From : Susan Weiler
Reply-To : weilercs@whitman.edu
Sent : September 6, 2005 7:26:22 PM
To : meredithmoss@aol.com
CC : disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu
Subject : Re: Teachers and Schools
Yes, it it looks clear that college students have a lot of opportunities -- but how about the K-12? Many local communities now have double the population of a month ago. My guess is teachers, even untrained teachers such as retired faculty and even undergrad and graduate students, are needed? Sort of like an extended Americorps?
cheers, sue
From : amy lindsey
Reply-To : lindseyamy@yahoo.com
Sent : September 7, 2005 2:00:40 AM
To : rbenjam1@ithaca.edu, weilercs@whitman.edu
CC : disaster_grads@lists.colorado.edu
Subject : Re: Teachers and Schools
as an emergency management employee sitting on the beach in
biloxi, ms I can tell you they need you monitary donatuins more
than anything. donations other than cash are logistically very
difficult and generally in disasters they dont. want your stuff
because they have nowhere to put it. let me recommend you first
speak to your local then state emergency management agencies. if
you want to donate more than money, donate your time to your
local red cross. with so many donations, theyll need. extra
help. please please do not self deploy- you will more than
likely be sent home before you get to your fdestination. oh
yeah, this is being written on a blackberry so sorry about any
typos. finally, if you attempt To come to the gulf, be warned
there is extremely little fuel and extremely long lines for what
fuel is left. fuel trucks are being deployed with armed guards
bc there have been a few attacks on vehicles and drivers.
thanks, amy lindsey
Amy
"Sometimes a person has to be surrounded by beauty to settle the soul."
Share with your friends: