Small business


Participating Center(s): LaRC



Download 1.54 Mb.
Page23/32
Date28.01.2017
Size1.54 Mb.
#9687
1   ...   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   ...   32
Participating Center(s): LaRC
The Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (ARMD) Airspace Operations and Safety Program (AOSP) is leading research in the area of integrated safety monitoring and assurance that detects, predicts and prevents safety problems in real-time.  ARMD sees its future, safety-related research focused in a forward looking, more comprehensive system-wide direction and is currently vetting a roadmap for Real-Time System-Wide Safety Assurance (RSSA) strategic activities.
Tools are being sought for use in creating a prototype of a RSSA capability.  The ultimate vision for RSSA is the delivery of a progression of capabilities that accelerate the detection, prognosis and resolution of system-wide threats.
Proposals under this subtopic are sought, but not limited to, these areas:


  • Develop and demonstrate data mining tools and techniques to detect and identify anomalies and precursors to safety threats system-wide.

  • Develop and demonstrate tools and techniques to assess and predict safety margins system-wide to assure airspace safety. 

  • Develop and demonstrate prognostic decision support tools and techniques capable of supporting real-time safety assurance.

  • Develop and demonstrate V&V tools and techniques for assuring the safety of air traffic applications during certification and throughout their lifecycles, and, techniques for supporting the real-time monitoring of safety requirements during operation.

  • Develop and demonstrate products to address technologies, simulation capabilities and procedures for reducing flight risk in areas of attitude and energy aircraft state awareness.

  • Develop and demonstrate decision support tools and automation that will reduce safety risks on the airport surface for normal operations and during severe weather events.

  • Develop and demonstrate alerting strategies/protocols/techniques that consider operational context, as well as operator state, traits, and intent.

  • Develop methodologies and tools for integrated prevention, mitigation, and recovery plans with information uncertainty and system dynamics in a TBO environment

  • Develop and demonstrate strategies for optimal human-machine coordination for real-time hazard mitigation.

  • Develop measurement methods and metrics for human-machine team performance and mitigation resolution.

  • Develop system-level performance models and metrics that include interdependencies and relationships among human and machine system elements.

Focus Area 21: Small Spacecraft Technologies



Participating MD(s): STMD
NASA’s technology, science, exploration, and space operations organizations are identifying a growing number of potential applications for very small spacecraft. Such spacecraft can accomplish missions at a fraction of the cost of larger conventional spacecraft and can be developed quickly and more responsively. In some cases, their small size and ability to be delivered in relatively large numbers may enable mission applications not possible with larger satellites. A small spacecraft can also serve as a low-cost platform for spaceflight testing of new technologies that are appropriate for spacecraft of any size.
Small spacecraft, for the purpose of this solicitation, are defined as those with a mass of 180 kilograms or less and capable of being launched into space as an auxiliary or secondary payload. Small spacecraft are not limited to Earth orbiting satellites but might also include interplanetary spacecraft, planetary re-entry vehicles, and landing craft.  Cubesats are a special category of small spacecraft and are of particular interest because launch opportunities tend to be more frequent and affordable compared to other small spacecraft, due to the standard sizes and containerization of cubesats.
Specific innovations being sought in this solicitation will be outlined in the subtopic descriptions. Proposed research may focus on development of new technologies but there is particular interest in technologies that are approaching readiness for spaceflight testing.  NASA’s Small Spacecraft Technology Program will consider promising SBIR technologies for spaceflight demonstration missions and seek partnerships to accelerate spaceflight testing and commercial infusion.
Some of the features that are desirable for small spacecraft technologies across all system areas are the following:


  • Simple design.

  • High reliability.

  • Low cost or short time to develop.

  • Low cost to procure flight hardware when technology is mature.

  • Small system volume or low mass.

  • Low power consumption in operation.

  • Suitable for rideshare launch opportunities or storage in habitable volumes (minimum hazards).

  • Tolerant of extreme thermal and/or radiation environments.

  • Able to be stored in space for several years prior to use.

  • High performance relative to existing system technology.

The following references discuss some of NASA’s small spacecraft technology activities:



www.nasa.gov/smallsats.
Another useful reference is the Small Spacecraft Technology State of the Art Report at:

http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/small_spacecraft_technology_state_of_the_art_2015_tagged.pdf.
Z8.01 Small Spacecraft Propulsion Systems

Lead Center: GRC

Participating Center(s): GSFC, JPL, MSFC
There are currently a wide range of technologies for propulsion systems, however the miniaturization of these systems for small spacecraft is a particular challenge. While cold gas or pulsed plasma systems are targeted for small delta-v, Δv application, modules that can provide more demanding maneuvers still need development. Small spacecraft buses other than cubesats have more flexibility to accommodate systems with several thruster units to provide more attitude control and also large single axis maneuvers. Missions have demonstrated these technologies successfully and performance data gathered has paved the way for future modifications of the existing hardware in order to re-adapt the designs to satisfy demanding constraints.
Specifically, proposals are solicited in the following areas:


  • High Impulse per unit volume (>2000 Ns/U):

    • Example applications: Interplanetary/Deep space, orbit capture.

    • Electric Propulsion with thrust greater than 1.25 mN.

    • Long life Chemical Propulsion.

    • High thrust/power ratio.

    • Delta-v > 1 km/sec.

    • Includes ACS functionality 

  • High Thrust per unit volume (>750 Ns/U):

    • Example applications: Orbit raising (MEO, GEO), long life LEO.

    • Electric Propulsion with thrust greater than 1.25 mN.

    • Chemical Propulsion thrust > 100 mN.

    • Includes ACS functionality.

    • Low soakback temps, (i.e., minimal increase to local bus temperature).

  • Precision Control (I-bit < 0.2 microN-sec) for spacecraft < 180 kg:

    • Example applications: Formation flying, tight pointing requirements.

    • Sub-microN thrust levels.

Proposers are expected to quantify improvements over relevant SOA technologies that will substantiate the investments in the new technology.  Key metrics for that comparison can include, but is not limited to, recurring cost, total impulse, thrust, life, sail characteristic acceleration, etc.  Potential opportunities for mission infusion for both technology demonstration and long-term mission application should be identified along with potential technology gaps that need to be addressed or assessed.


For concept/component development, proposals are solicited to mature propulsion concepts of TRL 2 or higher and mature them to TRL 6 at the component level.  For system level maturation, proposals are solicited to mature integrated system solutions capable of delivering potential qualification or flight hardware within the constraints of a Phase II SBIR with no or minimal need for enhancements or Phase III investments.
The desired features for a SmallSat propulsion system is one that balances reliability, high performance (i.e., relatively high specific impulse [Isp] and thrust), has no/minimal chemical or electromagnetic contamination issues, is low pressure (or pressurizes post deployment), safely contains propellant (hazardous or non-hazardous), low cost, and has the simplest design feasible in order to meet performance requirements. 
Z8.02 Small Spacecraft Communication Systems

Lead Center: GRC

Participating Center(s): ARC, GSFC, JPL, JSC, LaRC, MSFC
Space communications is an enabling capability to conduct NASA missions. Communications systems should impose the least possible constraints on mission spacecraft in order to meet required performance. Innovations and novel approaches are sought to reduce the mass, power consumption, volume, and operational constraints in order to increase the total data return, advance the technology readiness level, and reduce the cost and risk of communications systems for small spacecraft (generally considered to be on the order of 180 kg or less). Small spacecraft communication systems must be increasingly robust, flexible and diverse to support a wide variety of stand-alone and interconnected missions used by NASA to conduct space science, Earth science and exploration of the universe. Communication system components need to be able to operate over a range of environmental conditions, such as those imposed by launch vehicles and operations in space with appropriate levels of radiation tolerance. Infusion of new technologies or best commercial standards and practices (e.g., DVB-S2 standard, CubeSat form factors) that can demonstrably improve performance and be applied or adapted for use in Government, non-Government or commercial networks is desirable.
Proposals for innovations and advancements in technology readiness are sought in any of the following areas of small spacecraft communications systems:


  • High-gain Antennas (HGAs) - Development of HGAs are sought across a broad range of technologies including but not limited to deployable parabolic or planar arrays, active electronically steered arrays, novel antenna steering/positioning subsystems, and others suitable for use in high data rate transmission to, from and among small spacecraft. Operations compatible with NASA’s space communications infrastructure1 and Government exclusive or Government/non-Government shared frequency spectrum allocations (e.g., 25.5-27.0 GHz) is required. However, applicability or adaptability of the HGA technologies to non-Government use spectrum is also desirable [See References for applicable Government frequency spectrum allocations in the near Earth and deep space regions]. 

  • Transceivers and Radios - This area includes but is not limited to: radio frequency (RF) transmitters; amplifiers; low noise receivers, full duplex frequency selectable RF front-ends, integrated Global Navigation Satellite Service (GNSS) receivers, software defined or reconfigurable radios, or integrated transceivers and radios for links to relay satellites or direct to ground stations. In addition to reductions in mass, power consumption, volume and cost, increases in power and bandwidth efficiency, operational flexibility and frequency select-ability are sought. Small spacecraft transceivers and radios must be compatible with the operations of NASA’s space communications infrastructure.1 [See References for applicable NASA near Earth and deep space infrastructure guidelines and specifications]. 

  • Network and Application Service Protocols - Standard Internet protocols don’t work well over communication links that are subject to the frequent, transient service outages and/or long signal propagation delays that are characteristic of space flight communications. Innovations or advancements are sought in software and hardware systems that implement NASA’s delay/disruption tolerant networking (DTN) standards to support scalable, robust mission communications for small spacecraft missions. Implementation of protocols to enable low-power application communications among clusters of small spacecraft are also invited (e.g., Constrained Application Protocols, CoAP) [See References for applicable NASA and commercial networking standards]. 

  • Optical Communications - One-way optical communications for direct data downlink from small spacecraft can provide a useful communications mode for NASA and non-government missions while avoiding some of the complications associated with a two-way optical link (i.e., requiring an uplink beacon). Technology advancements or system-level solutions (i.e., space and ground segment components) are sought that increase the data rate or availability of optical communications for small spacecraft, or reduce mission risk, complexity or cost.

A typical approach to advance the technology readiness level (TRL) leading to future flight hardware/software demonstration of any of the small spacecraft communications technologies would include:


Phase I - Identify, evaluate and develop candidate small spacecraft communications technologies that offer potential advantages over the state of the art, demonstrate their technical feasibility, and show a path towards a hardware/software infusion into practice. Bench-level or lab-environment level demonstrations or simulations are anticipated deliverables. The Phase I proposal should outline a path that shows how the technology can be developed into space-qualifiable and commercially available small spacecraft communications systems through Phase II efforts and beyond.
Phase II - Emphasis should be placed on developing and demonstrating the candidate technologies under simulated small spacecraft spaceflight conditions or in the relevant environment. A demonstration unit for functional and environmental testing is an anticipated deliverable at the completion of the Phase II contract. Some of the products resulting from this subtopic may be included in a future flight opportunity for on-orbit testing or application demonstration.
All technologies developed under this subtopic area should be compatible with existing NASA space communications infrastructure1, frequency spectrum allocations, and applicable standards. However, applicability or adaptability to non-Government and commercial use as well is desirable.
(1) NASA’s space communications infrastructure includes the Near-Earth network (NEN) of ground stations, the Space Network (SN) of tracking and data relay satellites in geostationary Earth orbit, NASA’s Deep Space Network (DSN) of ground stations, and other assets such as the Wallops range ground station.
References – Please see the following references for more details:                                          

  • NASA Spectrum Policy: http://www.nasa.gov/directorates/heo/scan/spectrum/policy_and_guidance.html.

  • Spectrum Guidance for NASA Small Satellite Missions: http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/spectrum_guidance_smallsats_cubesats_2015.pdf.

  • Near Earth Network (NEN) Users Guide: http://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/450-SNUG_V10.pdf.

  • Space Network Users’ Guide (SNUG): http://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/453-NENUG%20R2.pdf.

  • Deep Space Network (DSN): http://deepspace.jpl.nasa.gov/advmiss/missiondesigndocs/.

  • Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking (DTN):

    • NASA DTN: http://www.nasa.gov/content/dtn.

    • InterPlanetary Networking Special Interest Group (IPNSIG) DTN www.ipnsig.org.

  • Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP):

    • Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Constrained RESTful environments (CoRE) Working Group: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/core/charter/.

    • IETF RFC 7252: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7252%20h.



Z8.03 Small Spacecraft Power and Thermal Control



Lead Center: GRC

Participating Center(s): GSFC, JPL, MSFC
SmallSats and CubeSats offer several new opportunities for space science, including multipoint in-situ measurements and disaggregation of larger science missions into constellations. These missions require reliable operation for several years in potentially harsh radiation environments.  Industry has developed numerous cubesat components, but they lack the robustness needed for long duration missions.  To address this capability gap, this subtopic will develop high reliability smallsat power generation and storage and thermal control systems that meet the performance and resource requirements of upcoming missions, while maximizing flexibility. An emphasis should be considered for energy management systems that combine power generation, storage and heat rejection in the compact cubesat platform as well as systems that enable electric propulsion.
The development of advanced power generation and energy storage technologies are critical to enabling and expanding the use of future small satellite missions. Proposed research may focus on the development of new power generation and storage technologies, with particular interest in technologies that are approaching readiness for spaceflight testing.  This subtopic solicits the development of modular, highly-reliable solar array, battery, power system electronics technologies that enable scalable smallsat and cubesat power systems with the following specifications:


  • Solar array input power ranging from 15 W to 100 W.

  • Battery capacity ranging from 5 Amp-hours to 20 Amp-hours (volume dependent).

  • Provides from 12 to 20 switched power services to users, with output voltages configurable to meet mission-specific requirements.

  • Maximum board size of 90 mm x 90 mm for power system electronics.

  • Configurable via I2C, SPI, or CAN bus interface.

  • Simple/modular power component designs (“plug and play”).

  • Supports body mounted or deployed solar arrays.

  • Supports power system reset initiated by external command (typically received from radio).

  • Tolerant of extreme thermal and/or radiation environments.

  • Ability to be stored in space for several years prior to use.

  • Novel and/or integrated power with other subsystems (i.e., power and communications, energy storage and satellite structure, combined power/propulsion subsystems, etc.).

Integration of the power and thermal subsystems is a synergistic combination that can result in mission-enabling resource savings.  For example, batteries often carry the most restrictive temperature range of all spacecraft hardware, which can drive the thermal design.  An integrated heat transfer turn-down device that helps to regulate temperature in extreme environments is a technology sought in this solicitation.  Examples include miniaturized heat switches and lightweight thermal capacitance devices that are integrated into the battery assembly, each being scalable and tunable to a specific mission’s requirements.


Deployable solar array systems are associated with higher waste heat dissipations, which in turn leads to higher volumetric heat fluxes for the small spacecraft.  With limited area for suitable radiator placement, deployed radiator systems will also become necessary.  Combining the radiator with the solar array will reduce the need for another deployment while also taking advantage of the environmental views. Technologies are sought to provide efficient heat transfer across the deployment mechanism. Thin radiator assemblies are needed to minimize increases in solar array thickness while also providing thermal isolation from the side with solar cells.  Radiator concepts can be passive (e.g., solid-state material or heat pipes) or active (e.g., integrated fluid tubing is assumed to interface with a spacecraft-provided pumped loop).
Integrating high thermal conductivity pathways from high heat flux power electronics components to chassis interfaces can provide incremental reductions in radiator sizes.  Order of magnitude improvements over copper thermal ground plane/card-lock technologies are sought.
In Phase I, contractors should prove the feasibility of proposed innovations using suitable analyses and tests. In Phase II, significant hardware or software capabilities that can be tested at NASA should be developed to advance their Technology Readiness Level (TRL). TRLs at the end of Phase II of 3-4 or higher are desired. NASA’s Small Spacecraft Technology Program will consider promising SBIR technologies for spaceflight demonstration missions and seek partnerships to accelerate spaceflight testing and commercial infusion.
Z8.04 Small Spacecraft Structures, Mechanisms, and Manufacturing

Lead Center: ARC

Participating Center(s): GSFC, JPL, LaRC, MSFC
Smallsats, including cubesats, are quickly maturing technologically towards advanced capabilities, which will result in significant contributions to the achievement of NASA’s scientific and exploration missions.  In fact, smallsats are seriously being considered for complex, long duration missions to deep space locations and for Earth observing constellations.  However, while smallsats have the benefit of small size and mass making them generally easier and cheaper to launch, many space applications require larger physical sizes or alternate structural architectures.  These applications can be realized through the innovative blending of structural elements with other functional elements; reconfigurable, reusable structures; reliable deployment mechanisms and aggregation techniques; and novel manufacturing techniques driving the utility of smallsats even further.  Three main thrust areas are envisioned for this subtopic.

Structures
In the area of smallsat structures, NASA is interested in materials and structural systems that optimize component or instrument packaging.  This includes techniques to integrate or combine structural elements with other subsystem elements (multi-functionality; i.e., spacecraft chassis with electrical power management, or internal spacecraft communications).  See related discussion below on Manufacturing on embedded systems into structures.
Also of interest are technologies that can allow aggregation of smaller elements in space to create larger structures that cannot be launched as a single element, or that do not have to be designed to withstand launch loads.  This implies integrative structural technologies that can share or distribute power, communications or thermal resources between the individual building blocks that can be arranged to perform a specific function in space.  Further, these systems of building blocks can be reconfigured once launched to enable in space assembly architectures.
Mechanisms
This area focuses on the stowage (during launch) and deployment (during space operations) of various elements and subsystems.  Included in this category are deployable solar cell arrays, radiators, antennas or other mission-enabling elements.  These deployable mechanisms should be reliable in a wide variety of space environments (LEO and/or deep space) and be compatible with existing smallsat architectures. Ideally, deployable mechanisms should include methods to verify proper deployment (i.e., latch sensors, etc.) and should also employ robust technologies such as motorized actuators versus passive stored energy systems such as springs.  Inflatable and on-orbit reconfigurable systems are also of interest.
Manufacturing and Materials
NASA is interested in technologies that take advantages of manufacturing advances as they apply to small spacecraft.  Examples include model-based additive manufacturing technologies that can create fluid manifolds, propellant tanks, small thrusters, or unique geometries not currently possible via traditional manufacturing techniques.  A related dimension to this area is multiple (or mass) production technologies that can be applied for the manufacturing of large numbers of spacecraft such as swarms or constellations.  Other concepts involve integrating electrical components and interconnects within structural elements, especially when such integration results not only in mass savings, but also decreased integration and test flow timelines and increased overall systems reliability through the use of built-in-test approaches.
Finally, NASA is interested in manufacturing technologies using novel materials that are low mass/density yet compatible with high radiation and extreme temperature deep space environments.
Z8.05 Small Spacecraft Avionics and Control

Lead Center: GSFC



Download 1.54 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   ...   32




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page