Preliminary Alternatives Screening
Development of a wind energy project is a highly iterative process. The Project proponent considered several alternative locations for Project infrastructure and eliminated options due to economic and environmental reasons throughout the early stages of planning. The Project proponent developed the Project layout over a period of more than three years. The placement of wind turbines is based upon the wind energy resource, the availability of leasable land, the setback constraints in the zoning ordinance, the avoidance of sensitive environmental resources, and constructability considerations.
The Project proponent conducted many preliminary studies to aid in the selection process and eliminate inappropriate sites from consideration. For example, the Project proponent conducted a Tier 2 Site Characterization Study of the SummitWind Resource Area (Tier 2 Study) consistent with the requirements of Chapter 3 of the USFWS Land-Based Wind Energy Guidelines (USFWS 2012b). Section 1.3.2 of this EA lists other preconstruction studies that the Project proponent has completed or is currently undertaking. These studies have already led to layout modifications. For example, the Project proponent adjusted the locations of several turbines and associated access roads and buried electrical lines in order to significantly minimize impacts to delineated wetlands and USFWS wetland easements. After field consultation with the USFWS, the Project proponent also adjusted the locations of four proposed turbines, moving them away from an active bald eagle nest and off of native grassland.
In addition, the Project proponent considered two alternate interconnection approaches requiring construction of a 4.5 mile and a 30-mile overhead electric transmission line to the Summit 115kV Substation in Roberts County, North Dakota and the Big Stone Substation in Big Stone, South Dakota, respectively. These alternatives were eliminated after determining that it would result in greater ground disturbance and visual impacts than the onsite POI. However, should Western choose the No Action Alternative, described below, it is possible that the Project proponent would reconsider an alternative interconnection.
Under the No Action Alternative, Western would not grant an interconnection agreement to SummitWind Farm.
Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action
General Purpose and Need
South Dakota has a voluntary Renewable Portfolio Standard encouraging 10 percent of all retail electricity sales in the state be obtained from renewable and recycled energy by 2015. Although South Dakota has already met its retail electricity targets, energy from the Project would significantly contribute to the state’s overall energy needs and may help serve energy export goals to neighboring states over the next 30 years.
According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA), “South Dakota is one of the least-populated states, and its total energy consumption is among the lowest in the nation. However, it is among the top 10 in total energy consumption per capita.” Although South Dakota has limited fossil fuel resources, it has significant renewable energy potential. More than one-fourth of the households in South Dakota use electricity as their primary energy source for home heating. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) estimates that 88 percent of South Dakota’s land area has high wind power potential and EIA estimates that South Dakota has the fifth-largest wind resource in the United States.
The Proposed Action would also provide much needed income to Grant County, South Dakota and its residents by way of landowner agreements, taxes and payments in lieu of taxes, construction expenses, and jobs. The Project proponent estimates that the Project’s total capital investment (including turbine cost) would be approximately $155 million.
Applicant Purpose and Need
The Project proponent is an independent power producer in the business of developing renewable energy power generation facilities for profit. The purpose of the Project proponent is to help entrepreneurial individuals, companies and communities generate their own renewable wind power.
Agency Purpose and Need
The Project proponent, as an Interconnection Customer, requests to interconnect its proposed Project with Western’s Summit-Watertown 115 kV transmission line at a tap configuration at the existing Summit-Watertown 115kV Transmission Line within the Project area. Western’s purpose and need is to consider and respond to the interconnection request in accordance with its Open Access Transmission Service Tariff (Tariff) and the Federal Power Act. Western’s Tariff is filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for approval.
Under the Tariff, Western offers capacity on its transmission system to deliver electricity when capacity is available. The Tariff also contains terms for processing requests for the interconnection of generation facilities to Western’s transmission system. In reviewing interconnection requests, Western must ensure that existing reliability and service is not degraded. Western’s Tariff provides for transmission and system studies to ensure that system reliability and service to existing customers are not adversely affected by new interconnections. These studies also identify system upgrades or additions necessary to accommodate the proposed project and address whether the upgrades/additions are within the project scope.
Authorizing Actions
Federal, state, and local agencies have jurisdiction over certain aspects of the Project. Authorizing actions and agencies are summarized in Table 1.6-1: SummitWind Farm Regulatory Authorizations.
Table 1.6-1: SummitWind Farm Regulatory Authorizations
Regulatory Action/Statute
|
Agency
|
Federal
|
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
|
Western
|
Large Generator Interconnection Agreement (LGIA)
|
Western
|
Section 7 of Endangered Species Act (ESA) Consultation
|
Western, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS)
|
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
|
Western, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS)
|
The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA)
|
Western, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS)
|
Special Use Permit (SUP), Right-of-
Way Permit, Compatibility Analysis
of Disturbed Easements, Exchange of Grassland and Wetland Easements
|
U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS)
|
Section 404 Clean Water Act Permit
|
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District
|
Form 7460-1. Notice of Proposed
Construction
|
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
|
Section 106 of National Historic Preservation Act Consultation
|
Western, State Historical Preservation Office (SHPO), and Tribal Nations
|
Native American Graves Protection
and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) Compliance
|
Western and Tribal Nations
|
American Indian Religious Freedom Act
|
Western and Tribal Nations
|
State
|
Overweight/Oversized Permits
|
South Dakota Department Of Transportation (SDDOT)
|
Road Approach/Access Permit
|
South Dakota Department Of Transportation (SDDOT)
|
Utility Crossing Permit
|
South Dakota Department Of Transportation (SDDOT)
|
Aeronautical Hazard Permit
|
South Dakota Department Of Transportation (SDDOT)
|
National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES),
General Construction Storm Water and
Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan
|
South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR)
|
Section 401, Clean Water Act (CWA)
|
South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR)
|
State Threatened and Endangered
Species Consultation
|
South Dakota Game, Fish and
Parks (GFP)
|
Notice to Telecommunications Companies
|
South Dakota Codified Law SDCL 49-32-3.1
|
Notice to the PUC
|
Public Utilities Commission (PUC) SDCL 49-41B-25.1
|
Local
|
Right-of-Way
|
Grant County
|
Overweight and over width permit
|
Grant County
|
Conditional Use Permit: wind farm and transmission line.
|
Grant County
|
Building Permits: towers, collection lines, feeder lines, buildings, and substation.
|
Grant County
|
Soil Erosion and Sediment Control
Plan
|
Grant County
|
Share with your friends: |