Table of Contents introduction & vocabulary 2



Download 0.73 Mb.
Page18/23
Date20.05.2018
Size0.73 Mb.
#49610
1   ...   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23

CAPITAL GAINS AND LOSSES


  • Code § 11. Tax imposed.

  • Code § 1211. Limitation on capital losses.

  • Code § 1212. Capital loss carrybacks and carryovers. (caps the loss deductions for corporations at gains and non-corporate taxpayers at gains + $3,000)

  • Code § 1221(a). Capital asset defined—In general.

  • Code § 1221(b)(3). Capital asset defined—Definitions and special rules.

  • Code § 1222. Other terms relating to capital gains and losses.



  • More than 12 months  long–term capital asset & preferential treatment (15%, or if your ordinary income is taxed at 0-10% you get 0% tax on capital gains)

    • Less than 12 months, short-term

  • Basketing effect—individuals can use capital loss to offset ordinary income up to $3,000

    • Can carryback excess losses 3 years, or carry forward 5 years

    • (Corporations can only deduct losses to the extent that they have gains)

  • ONLY applies when you have a sale or exchange

    • Sometimes you have to bifurcate your gains—i.e. if your employer pays $14.1K for an asset worth $12.1K that you bought for $10--$2.1K capital gains, $2K compensation (or you could try to justify an idiosyncratic value)

  • Interest income is capital income (as in income from saving and investing) but it’s NOT a capital gain

  • Capital assets are not necessarily just assets you capitalize—we have to look at code to see what qualifies to generate capital gains/losses

  • Individuals

    • Capital losses are fully deductible against capital gains § 1211(d)

    • You can deduct a loss against up to $3,000 in ordinary income

    • If IBM stock that you’ve held for more than 1 year loses $5,000 you can deduct the loss against any capital gains and $3,000 of ordinary income and the rest you can carry forward to deduct against capital gains and $3,000 of ordinary income in the next year

    • Can carry forward indefinitely—but can only carry forward to the extent of your capital income

      • If you have: 8,000 Net capital loss; Taxable income = 4,000

      • Deduct 3,000 against TI; carry forward 4,000; lose 1,000 of deduction

    • Can deduct short-term capital losses against long-term capital gains

  • Corporations

    • can only carryback for 3 years and forward 5 years

    • Why can’t corporations carry forward indefinitely?

      • We want to limit corporations cherry picking—selling losing capital assets for deductions and never realizing income on appreciating capital assets

      • Driven by the realization requirement—motivates concern about cherry picking

**as an individual you really like capital gain income and ordinary losses—preferential rate and deductions at ordinary income rates

Capital Asset--§ 1221(a)—more than one year generate long-term capital gains/losses taxed at preferential rate—up to and including one year generate short-term capital gains/losses taxed as ordinary income

What defines a capital gain?

  1. The transaction must involve “property” that is a “capital asset”

  2. The property must be transferred in a “sale or exchange” and

  3. The minimum holding period must be met.



  • Policy Discussion: Capital Gains Preference

    • Arguments FOR Preference

      • Bunching

        • problem arises because people would otherwise cherry pick to avoid the implications of the realization requirement and stepped up basis § 1014

          • Other potential responses to bunching?

            • Mark-to-market and accrual taxation

            • Income averaging—apply gains to all years that taxpayer held the asset

        • Inflation—capital gains increase long-term lockstep with inflation  capital gains try to tax only growth over the inflation rate

      • Lock-in

        • Stepped up basis

        • You have to hold a capital asset for a year to get preferable treatment—exacerbates lock in effect

        • If you raise the capital gains rate people might hold assets longer to delay realization

          • If you suggest cut the capital gains rate—someone will have a study that says it will raise more revenue—does not seem to be the case in the long run

      • Dynamic Scoring

        • Takes into account macroeconomic effect

        • Makes revenue estimates depend on feedback effects and assumptions

        • Capital gains are concentrated among high-income households

      • Encourages savings and economic growth

Problem Set #15: What is a Capital Asset?

  1. Ruth is an individual taxpayer in the 35% bracket. She has the choice to invest in one of the following three assets:

    1. A bond selling for $10,000 that will pay $1,000 each year for two years, (ORDINARY INCOME)

    2. $10,000 of growth stock that will pay no dividends and that Ruth expects to be worth $12,100 in two years when she will set it, (CAPITAL ASSET § 1221(a)(1)) or

    3. Stock selling for $10,000, which will pay dividends of $1,000 each year for the next two years and maintain its initial value. (CAPITAL ASSET § 1221(a)(1) + DIVIDENDS TAXED AT PREFERENTIAL RATE)

  2. If Ruth were indifferent between these investment choices (pre-tax), how might tax considerations influence her behavior?

A—Interest income is ordinary income

B—preferential rate—$12,100 subject to long-term cap gains rate in 2 years

C –preferential rate—$11,000 at cap gains rate in 2 years and $1,000 at preferential rate in 1 year (dividends taxed like capital gains § 1(h)(11))

**TVM of payment of preferential rate 1 year earlier makes B more favorable than C and preferential rates make both B and C more favorable than A.



  1. If the taxpayer in (1) was a university instead of an individual in the 35% tax bracket, how might tax considerations influence its behavior?

§ 115 Tax exempt  would look only at CFs and risk profiles

  1. Given the answers in (1) and (2), how might the market react to the cost of the investments described above?

The market would be fragmented in its preferences—individuals would purchase B (relatively inflate)  as universities invest they will prefer C because B’s price will inflate slightly—market sorting, price capitalization of tax benefit likely imperfect but present

Directory: sites -> default -> files -> upload documents
upload documents -> Torts Outline Daniel Ricks
upload documents -> Torts outline Functions of Tort Law
upload documents -> Constitutional Law (Yoshino, Fall 2009) Table of Contents
upload documents -> Arrest: (1) pc? (2) Warrant required?
upload documents -> Civil procedure outline
upload documents -> Criminal Procedure: Police Investigation
upload documents -> Regulation of Agricultural gmos in China
upload documents -> Rodriguez Con Law Outline Judicial Review and Constitutional Interpretation
upload documents -> Standing Justiciability (§ 501 Legal/beneficial owner of exclusive right? “Arising under” jx?) 46 Statute of Limitations Run? 46 Is Π an Author? 14 Is this a Work of Joint Authorship? 14 Is it a Work for Hire?
upload documents -> Fed Courts Outline: 26 Pages

Download 0.73 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page