Tampa Prep 2009-2010 Impact Defense File



Download 2.71 Mb.
Page124/230
Date28.01.2017
Size2.71 Mb.
#9494
1   ...   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   ...   230

AT: Military Overstretch



1. Overstretch empirically denied - the military faced extreme shortages and lack of military readiness with no impacts last year

National Security Network ’08 (The National Security Network was founded in June 2006 to revitalize America's national security policy, bringing cohesion and strategic focus to the progressive national security community, “The progressive approach: The Military restore American military Power”, 5-13-08, http://www.nsnetwork.org/node/850)

Our military is second to none, but eight years of negligence, lack of accountability, and a reckless war in Iraq have left our ground forces facing shortfalls in both recruitment and readiness. Every service is out of balance and ill-prepared. We need a new strategy to give the military the tools it needs for the challenges we face today. And we need leadership that meets our obligations to the men and women who put their lives on the line. Overview The U.S. military is a fighting force second to none. It didn’t get that way by accident – it took decades of careful stewardship by civilian as well as military leaders in the Pentagon, the White House, and on Capitol Hill. But eight years of Administration recklessness, and a lack of oversight from conservatives on Capitol Hill, have put the military under enormous strain. Active-duty generals at the highest levels have said that “the current demand for our forces is not sustainable… We can’t sustain the all-volunteer force at the pace that we are going on right now” (Army Chief of Staff George Casey, April 2008); that in terms of readiness, many brigades being sent back to Afghanistan and Iraq were “not where they need to be” (Army Vice-Chief of Staff Richard Cody, SASC subcommittee hearing, April 14, 2008); and that “we cannot now meet extra force requirements in places like Afghanistan” (Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mullen on National Public Radio, April 2008). Readiness and Response: Two-thirds of the Army – virtually all of the brigades not currently deployed to Afghanistan or Iraq – are rated “not combat ready.” The dramatic equipment shortages of a few years ago have been improved but not completely remedied. Recruitment and Retention: These conditions of service, and the strains they place on military family members, have hindered Army efforts (and to a lesser extent those of the Marine Corps) to recruit and retain the requisite number and quantity of service members. The Army has been forced to lower its educational and moral standards and allow an increasing number of felons into its ranks. It is also struggling to keep junior officers, the brains of the force, who represent the height of the military’s investment in its people – and whose willingness to stay on represents a crucial judgment on Administration policies. The Marine Corps, America’s emergency 911 force, is under similar strain. The Commandant of the Marine Corps said in February 2008 that the Marines will not be able to maintain a long term presence in both Afghanistan and Iraq. The National Guard and Reserve are already suffering from severe shortages of equipment and available combat personnel. In many states, the Army National Guard would struggle to respond to a natural or man-made disaster – just as the Kansas National Guard struggled to respond to the severe tornados last year. How, and whether, we rebuild our military in the wake of the fiasco in Iraq will likely shape it for the next generation. Too much of our military posture is left over from the Cold War. Our forces are being ground down by low-tech insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the most immediate threat confronting the U.S. is a terrorist network that possesses no tanks or aircraft. We must learn the lessons of Iraq and dramatically transform our military into a 21st century fighting force ready to confront the threats of today and tomorrow.
2. The Military will ALWAYS have enough troops due to immigrants serving

Boston Globe 2-19-09 (“Faster citizenship in uniform”, Lexis Nexis)

THE MILITARY has long had a policy of offering accelerated citizenship to legal immigrants with green cards who volunteer for service. Now it is going to offer the same inducement to immigrants who are refugees or on temporary work or student visas. While thorough background checks will be needed to make sure the recruits aren't sleeper agents for enemy states or terrorist organizations, the program should help the Pentagon cope with two wars and the need to be prepared for other conflicts. The Army, which is taking the lead on the new policy, hopes to use it to draw immigrants who have medical training or linguistic skills and familiarity with foreign cultures. The service is quick to point out that the new program is not a means of meeting overall recruitment goals. Until the recession hit, the Army could meet its goals only by admitting higher percentages of enlistees without high school diplomas or who need waivers for medical conditions or criminal records. The poor economy is expected to make recruitment easier, as young people turn to the military for job opportunities. But the two wars of this decade have taught the military how critical it is to have troops with the ability to speak languages used in the world's hot spots, from the Pushtu of Pakistan and Afghanistan to the Somali and Swahili of East Africa. The new program also recognizes the large number of immigrant doctors and nurses working in this country, whose skills are also needed in the military. To qualify for enlistment, the immigrants will need to have been in the United States at least two years. Once sworn in, they can immediately apply for citizenship and can get it in as little as six months. To protect against sleeper agents, all the recruits will be subject to screening by the Department of Homeland Security, in addition to the initial DHS screen done before they received their visas. Further checking will be done if anything questionable turns up. Fingerprints of recruits will be checked against those picked up by US officials at terrorism sites overseas. While the new troops can qualify as "translator aides," none of the immigrant recruits will serve in any capacity requiring a security clearance until they have become citizens. The new policy has strong historical roots. Non-citizen immigrants have served in all the nation's wars. Still, an official of the American Legion veterans organization, while approving careful recruitment of visa holders, worries about any "great influx of immigrants" to the United States. Veterans - and active-duty troops - should be the first to recognize the value of service members who can be the voice and ears of the military on unfamiliar ground. The program is a sound one that the Army should move on as quickly as possible.



Download 2.71 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   ...   230




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page