The Battle of Frenchtown (1855), Washington Territory: the Political and Demographic Context rev 9/4/11


So why was there a Frenchtown at this battle site? Well for starters, as mentioned earlier, most of the French-Canadian West ended up in the U.S



Download 125.74 Kb.
Page4/6
Date18.10.2016
Size125.74 Kb.
#991
1   2   3   4   5   6

So why was there a Frenchtown at this battle site? Well for starters, as mentioned earlier, most of the French-Canadian West ended up in the U.S.




As such, the worlds of the U.S. Army and the Canadians intersected all across the American West. This is clearly not the West in the mind of the general public, which is more geared to Hollywood, and dime-novel distortions.


One of the most important members of Lewis & Clark’s Corps of Discovery had been their principal scout, translator and hunter, Georges Drouillard. Then when Astor decided to set up a trading operation near the mouth of the Columbia a few years later, Canadians of French and Scottish origins constituted a major proportion of his employees and partners. Then with Fremont’s expeditions in the 1840s, though Kit Carson got all the press with the American reading public who wanted to hear about one-of-their-own, Fremont’s other principal scout was Basil Lajeunesse. A few years later, in September 1849 Captain William Warner headed up into the mountains of northeastern California from Sacramento to scout the region for alternative trails entering Oregon from the south. And who was beside Capt. Warner when they both went down in a hail of arrows at the head of an Army column? Nobody named Juan or Pedro, but there was a scout named Francois Bercier. As for the mountain range, it was named, of course, for the martyred Captain, not the scout. Likewise, whenever Governor Stevens ventured into the interior, though his trust in them was highly variable, he found himself forced by circumstances into relying on the likes of Pierre Boutineau, Antoine Plante, Andre Dominique Pambrun, and Georges Montour.

Following the return of the Lewis and Clark Expedition, it took decades for American settlers to actually start to migrate out to the Pacific Northwest, several more years to establish a new



border (1846), and then three more years for the first U.S. Army units to arrive in 1849. The latter had in the interim been preoccupied in Mexico and California. The principal public authority in the region during the intervening period had been a British chartered trading monopoly – the Hudson Bay Company (HBC) – responsible for the Western two-thirds of British North America. It was the Hudson’s Bay Company that intervened to save the 56 surviving hostages of the Whitman Massacre in December 1847. There were still no American authorities on hand, and would not be for another 18 months. In fact, it would not be until 1872 that the company and the British Army withdrew from their last enclaves in Washington Territory, where Indians still outnumbered whites till around 1860. The HBC’s current and former employees in the region, mostly of Canadien extraction - along with their mixed-blood families – totaled approximately one thousand people by the early 1840s, as the Americans began to arrive in significant numbers over the Oregon Trail.


These former employees had been establishing a series of settlements up river from the company’s various trading posts, receiving various names from the new arrivals, including French Towns, or Prairies, or French Settlement. Though Canadiens in fact - along with their Indian and mixed-blood wives and mixed-blood children – they constituted the majority of settlers in Oregon’s Willamette Valley prior to November 1843 and in Washington Territory until around 1850. Contrary to convenient mythology, most of these people never left the region, though they tended to relocate into the more remote corners of the backcountry over the following decades, many descendants ultimately ending up on several interior Indian

Reservations.


From the battles of Vincennes (1779), to Detroit (1812), along with an earlier Battle of Frenchtown in Michigan (1813) - on to points west, these Canadien/metis border communities found themselves in the eye of the storm. Lines drawn at tables located on the Atlantic seaboard ignored a less clear-cut reality in the interior. And as their native relations were by no means willing to be passive actors, this multi-cultural people were caught in the middle of the ensuing disturbances. The earlier Battle of Frenchtown fought in southeast Michigan is considered to be the bloodiest single defeat suffered by the Americans during the War of 1812.
Along the way, these families, had become the first settlers of the region, usually with smaller scale farming and ranching, often supplementing their income by occasional work as packers, cowhands, ranchers, woodcutters, ferry operators, or toll bridge operators. A significant number were also hired as guides, interpreters, and scouts by the new governmental authorities. Moreover, they did not go away.
Washington Territory was not all that different from other areas along the northern borderlands, except as to the particulars. Clearly the hottest, or cutting edge racial issues weren’t what are usually portrayed. Their numbers, their strategic locations, and their skill sets meant that the half-breeds, mostly metis, couldn’t be ignored by the new set of decision makers. As earlier in the century on the frontiers of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota, at the time and place they had to be dealt with first - as the original settler group, and necessary intermediaries. This was still Indian Territory. The metis knew the local people and their languages. In Washington, during the 1850s those locals – the Indians - not only constituted a majority of the territory’s population through the end of the decade, but they were the primary source of hired labor, which was still mostly a seasonal requirement. They were also the key to local sources of nourishment. In addition to communication between friends, relations, neighbors or strangers, they knew the terrain. It wasn’t easy to get around without the Indians or metis serving as guides and providing packhorses, ferry services, or canoes. These peoples could be marginalized, then integrated or disposed of later, but for now they were needed. Splitting allegiances down the middle – divide and conquer is usually a good tactic. Many of the descendents of the oldest metis families, though, had already gone the other way, being by then three quarters or even 7/8 Indian, such as the Finleys and the Plantes.
Kent Richards, encapsulates the situation at the first meeting of the territorial assembly in 1854 for us.

A major issue of the session was the status of the French Canadians formerly employed by the Hudson Bay Company who continued to reside in the territory. Some of the legislators argued that most of the Canadians were pioneers who helped open up the country and who paid taxes. Some citizens petitioned for the denial of voting privileges to anyone who could not read or write English, and, after hot debate, the legislature granted the vote to half-breeds who the election judges determined had adopted the habits of civilization, a compromise that allowed Canadian farmers to vote but excluded those living among the Indians. [Richards p. 188]


This story also reminds us of the multiple challenges faced by our predecessors in the mid-19th century in establishing the authority of the Federal Government in this far corner of the world. Americans had arrived late on the scene, and some were inclined to over-compensate for the slow start. As with other matters in life, the establishment of government authority in borderlands, haste often makes waste. Political expediency is no excuse, in military affairs at the time, nor in the later writing of history.
(4) The rest of the Story



Download 125.74 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page