The Financial Times: Ask the experts: Urban planet
Next year most of the world's population will be living in cities, but for
one in three people that will mean a crime-ridden slum with inadequate housing
and services.
Rapid urban growth will present enormous environmental problems with
overcrowding and poor housing compounded by poor sanitation and a lack of clean
water.
Anna Tibaijuka, executive director at UN-Habitat, (above right) and Fiona
Harvey, (above left), FT environment correspondent, answer your questions in a
live Q&A today from 1pm BST. Click the refresh button on your browser for the
latest
The ANC has promised to get rid of all the slums in Johannesburg by 2014. Is
this a realistic ambition and can it be done without forcing people to leave
their homes Sue Knights, Johannesburg, South Africa
Anna Tibaijuka: It is widely accepted that political will in responding to
the reality of slums is pivotal in mobilising commitment to help the urban poor
to gain access to adequate shelter, livelihoods and services. South Africa
stands out as one of the countries that has demonstrated consistent political
commitment over the last years to large-scale slum upgrading and service
provision for the urban poor. It is true that so far its slum growth has fallen
by only 0.5 per cent but the South African government and especially the local
authorities are demonstrating that it is possible to develop the capacity to
use their mandates and resources for sound and participatory urban development
policy.
In the last few years, the slum annual growth was reduced to 0.49 per cent
while the urban population is growing at a rate of 1.6%. In addition to this,
they are mobilising resources to ameliorate the present situations, planning for
future needs, expanding local sources of revenue, attracting investment all in
active cooperation and dialogue with residents, but especially with the urban
poor.
In such an environment, we hope that people will not be forced to leave their
homes, but on the contrary to participate actively in the transformation of
their living conditions.
Fiona Harvey: It certainly sounds challenging, but it's not impossible if the
political will and economic resources are there. People should not be forced to
leave their homes, but should be given incentives to move elsewhere if that is
necessary. Or their homes can be improved to allow people to continue living
where they want to, but with access to basic infrastructure.
The UN has found that one of the most important factors in successfully
replacing slums with decent housing is a consistent, long term political will to
tackle the problem, and unfortunately that appears to be what has most often
been lacking in many places in the past. If the ANC can provide that, the
practical infrastructural problems can be overcome.
With the unprecedented rise of the city, how can we make sure that we
preserve our natural environment? Shouldn't we put more pressure on urban
planners when it comes to environmental conservation? David Mason, Bradford, UK
Anna Tibaijuka: I believe that the environmental future of the planet will be
won or lost in the streets of our cities. After all this is where most of the
resources are consumed creating large and unsustainable ecological footprints.
If successful, good urban governance and planning can make cities and towns
environmentally sustainable.
It has been clear ever since the Rio Conference that environmental management
has to be closely linked to the management of cities and human settlements. In
response, urban planning has been changing over the years to meet the demands of
ever-expanding cities both in the developed and developing world.
Conventional urban planning worked in stable political and institutional
environments with well-coordinated mechanisms, sound development strategies,
functional markets and effective intervention strategies. But it has been less
effective in poor countries with ill-equipped structures and serious problems of
governance.
In a world where almost one billion people live in slums, we need to find a
new concept of urban planning, which combines concerted action by local
authorities, national governments, civil society actors and the international
community, works to alleviate the plight of slum dwellers. Urban planning cannot
yield positive results in an environment of poverty with weak governance
structures.
In other words, urban planners cannot just work to ensure environmental
sustainability, our argument is that they must also struggle to make cities and
towns socially sustainable. After all poverty is the greatest polluter of them
all.
There are an increasing number of initiatives that integrate environmental
and social concerns. For example, UN-Habitat has been working closely with other
UN agencies and partners on "localising agenda 21" and "sustainable cities" to
help reduce the impact cities have on the environment.
What these projects and programmes illustrate is that urban planning will
only be effective if it addresses problems that are rooted in the
socio-economic and political realities of our time.
Fiona Harvey: In some ways, the rise of the city is a good thing for the
natural environment as it keeps more people in one place, rather than spread
out everywhere. But cities themselves can be made less environmentally
destructive by investing in cleaner power (renewable electricity, for example,
or at least ways of avoiding the use of coal or biomass for domestic cooking);
by providing good public transport and enforcing pollution standards on private
vehicles; by investing in waste management facilities that enable waste to be
recycled, composted or burned for energy instead of being sent to landfill; by
preserving areas of woodland, wetland or other natural features in parks within
cities; and by ensuring that industries are adopting technology that eliminates
or minimises the pollution they cause.
The problem of overcrowded slums come from rural people no longer being able
to make a decent living. Should the UN and governments around the world consider
ways of making rural life more attractive? Overcrowded cities in the developing
world ultimately result in slums and shanty towns. How can organisations such as
UN-Habitat encourage people to leave urban life and return to the rural areas?
Jamie McGeorge, London, UK
Anna Tibaijuka: There are no silver bullets: the failure of agricultural
policies in the developing world are closely linked to the issue of agricultural
subsidies in the developed world. Though no one has been able to stop migration
to cities, it is clear that a more vibrant agricultural sector would contribute
greatly to reducing the flow of people into the urban areas.
As outlined below, there is also an urgent need for comprehensive integrated
strategies of rural and urban development that would ensure more investment in
infrastructure to link rural and urban areas.
It is interesting to note that the "commission for Africa report" pointed out
that Africa is one of the few continents where railway infrastructure only
connects mines and extractive industries to the ports, rarely creating networks
for market exchange. The report rightly calls on the international community to
invest more in infrastructure in order to improve rural urban linkages and to
allow agricultural markets to flourish.
Having said this it is important to understand that the growth of cities is
not just a phenomenon of migration from rural to urban areas. An increasing
proportion of people are migrating from smaller cities to larger cities. At the
same time, natural population increases are becoming a significant contributor
to urban growth, and reclassification of rural settlements into urban areas is
speeding the rate of urbanisation.
The implication of all this is that though rural development can and should
be encouraged, it is not an antidote for urbanisation.
Fiona Harvey: I see you live in London - is that because you weren't able to
make a decent living on the land, or did you want the amenities and social
opportunities that only a city could provide?
People don't just want to live in cities because rural life does not offer
enough economically - they want better access to services, such as health and
education, they want a wider range of opportunity, they want the social life
that cities provide. People have wanted to live in cities for millennia. If this
is what people want, the answer is not to encourage them to return to rural
areas - as they won't - but to improve the infrastructure of cities to cope with
such a large influx of people.
What steps can be taken to improve environmental and sanitary conditions in
the various slums around the world? People come to big cities for better jobs,
education and healthcare, even if it means living in a slum. Can we improve the
standard of living for the slumdweller or are large and controversial slum
clearances (like those that we saw in Zimbabwe last year) inevitable Rebecca
Grant, LA, US
Anna Tibaijuka: The formation of slums is neither inevitable nor acceptable.
Experience shows that it is not possible to run the poor out of town either
through evictions or discriminatory practices. This is not the answer.
UN-Habitat's position is that it is possible to help the poor to become more
integrated into the fabric of urban society through jobs, education opportunity
and access to housing and basic services. This is the only long-lasting and
sustainable solution to the growing urbanisation of poverty.
The first and most important step is for governments and local authorities to
understand that urbanisation is here to stay. The urban poor are not going to
disappear and demolishing their homes is only a recipe for long-term disaster.
Instead what is needed for local authorities to eject outmoded forms of
governance and old colonial by laws. The poor have a right to the city and it is
the job of local authorities to encourage inclusive cities.
When writing my report on Zimbabwe, as the UN secretary general's special
envoy on human settlements issues in Zimbabwe, I stressed the fact that crisis
of eviction in that country was a reflection of the larger crisis of
urbanisation in Africa. In fact, the report calls for a global commitment to
prioritising the shelter needs of the urban poor.
Fortunately, this call has been taken up by the African Union and NEPAD which
are strongly committed to improving the management of the cities in the
continent and to slum upgrading. This was reinforced in the "commission for
Africa report. "Our common interest" stated categorically that urbanisation was
the second greatest challenge facing Africa after HIV/Aids and that more
resources have to be targeted at urban development. Specifically, it called for
the funding of a slum upgrading facility that can help developing countries
establish pro-poor mortgage mechanisms.
Unfortunately, one of the sad facts about development is that international
aid agencies have tended to invest more in rural areas. The presumption is that
anyone living in the city is better off but, as UN-Habitat statistics show, the
poor suffer from an urban penalty, the result of which is that their children
die younger. This new phenomenon, known as the "urbanisation of poverty", needs
to be taken seriously by everyone so that new ways of funding can be found for
slum upgrading and pro-poor shelter.
Evidence from around the world suggests that it is possible to implement
massive slum upgrading programmes through good governance; pro-poor policies and
most importantly, resource mobilisation. In fact, UN-Habitat's" state of the
world cities report 2006" shows that countries that had successfully reduced
slum growth rates, slum proportion and slum populations in the last 15 years
shared many attributes: their governments had shown long-term political
commitment to slum upgrading and prevention; many had undertaken progressive
pro-poor land and housing reforms to improve the tenure status of slum dwellers
or to improve their access to basic services; most used domestic resources to
scale up slum improvements and prevent future growth; and significant number had
put in place policies that emphasised equity in an environment of economic
growth.
Fiona Harvey: Large slum clearances are not necessary, and it is possible to
move people from one area to another, or to improve their standard of living
without resorting to force. Environmental and sanitary conditions can be vastly
improved by the supply of basic infrastructure - the most basic are water and
sewage. The most important condition for successfully improving people's living
conditions is having the "buy-in" and support of local people.
Too often in the past, aid agencies or governments have provided some piece
of basic infrastructure, like a water pump or well, and then left, leaving local
people without the means to maintain it, so that a few years later the situation
has reverted to what it was before. If local people have a stake in the
development of their area, they are more likely to maintain it. This can include
giving people legal title to the land they inhabit, which encourages people to
invest their resources into developing it, without fear it will be taken from
them.
Mexico City has experienced tremendous, and rather uncontrolled growth over
the past couple decades. The massive migration of people from the countryside to
Mexico City has been a cause of a widespread mentality of people in Mexico that
life in the city may bring better opportunities. This massive migration has
created misery belts around the city with rising poverty and crime. This has
happened in major cities in China, but to a much lesser extent, and it is mostly
due to government migration regulations where you are not allowed to move
without prior authorisation.
These regulations have proven to be somewhat effective in preventing the
massive (relatively speaking) growth of misery belts around cities in China.
However, they seem a bit extreme in the sense that it limits people's freedom
of movement around the country. I would just like to know your opinion on these
regulations, if they are extreme or effective, and if they would be applicable
in other countries where growth rates are worrying. Also, what types of
strategies do you suggest in order to prevent misery belts from forming around
major cities in the world Jaime Mart, Mexico City
Anna Tibaijuka: In a democracy people vote with their feet and move freely to
areas that offer them opportunities. It is very difficult to stop the flow of
people into cities and towns. Urbanisation is one of the most powerful,
irreversible forces in the world.
Today, half of the world's population live in urban areas and it is estimated
that 93 per cent of the future urban population growth will occur in the cities
of Asia and Africa and to a lesser extent Latin America and the Caribbean.
Traditionally, urbanisation has been closely linked to the process of
industrialisation. With increased agricultural productivity, people were pushed
off the land and pulled into the factories in cities.
However, today, Africa and many other developing countries seem to be going
through a process of 'premature urbanisation'. Because of the many conflicts on
the continent and the failure of agricultural policies, Africans are being
pushed into cities where, unfortunately, there are no jobs.
Clearly what is needed in Africa is a cessation of hostilities. At the same
time, policy makers and planners have to design integrated strategies of rural
and urban development that, amongst other things, encourage the growth of
smaller towns. This is one of the best ways to avoid the creation of
mega-cities with their unmanageable slums. However, many such strategies falter
because the success of agricultural policies is closely linked to the problems
of agricultural subsidies and international trade.
In the case of Mexico city, as in many other mega-cities of the world, we
have observed that the economies of scale that a large city offers - employment,
education, and social amenities - can become dis-economies of scale. With
increased size the negative externalities mean that land and transport costs are
extremely high and pollution is rampant.
Fortunately, many cities have a natural tendency to stop growing. This
happens either because the rural population no longer moves to the city, for the
reasons cited above, or because the urban population starts moving to the
suburbs. This is already happening in Mexico City. In the 1960s, the cities
annual growth rate was 6 per cent, but today it is 1.3 per cent and it is
estimated to go down to 0.8 per cent in 2020.
As for the misery belts in cities around the world, there are many well
established ways for in-situ slum upgrading that involve partnership between
governments, local authorities, the private sector, non-governmental
organisations and the poor themselves. For example, governments in developing
countries need to build on the experience of micro-credit facilities to
encourage banks to establish pro-poor mortgage mechanisms. What is the needed is
the political will and resources to upscale these projects and programmes.
In conclusion, it is important to note that, finally, the problems of slum
dwellers are being taken more seriously. The realisation that there are already
one billion slum dwellers and that this figure could double by 2030, is starting
to galvanise the international community.
In 2000, at the Millennium Summit, world leaders voiced their concern about
the increasing number of slum dwellers, going so far as to ensure that one of
the Millennium Development Goals (Goal 7 Target 11) was specifically aimed at
improving the lives of slum dwellers.
Fiona Harvey: Rather than tell people where they are allowed to live and
where they can't, which most people in a democracy would find an infringement
of their freedoms, governments can create incentives for people to move to
certain areas and avoid certain others. They can try to direct migration by
pointing out to people thinking of moving the opportunities available in a
variety of places, rather than the most obvious city (often the capital, or the
biggest city).
Providing infrastructure, such as homes, water, electricity and public
transport, in an area that is underdeveloped can help to attract migrants there
instead of to other, overcrowded places. But in order to be sustainable, there
must be jobs available in these areas as well as infrastructure, or people will
soon leave them. Governments must accept that people will move to where they see
opportunity, with permission or not, and deal with the situation accordingly -
trying to stop people doesn't work, as they find a way to move legally or
illegally.
With most of the world's population living in cities next year, how is the
demand for clean drinking water for all going to be met Michael Glennan, NY, US
Anna Tibaijuka: Many cities are beginning to confront water shortages. Right
now the cities in the developed world are consuming ten times more drinking
water than those in developing countries: 500 to 800 litres per day as compared
with 60 to 150 litres per day.
However with 93 per cent of the projected urban growth in the next fifteen
years taking place in developed countries, in small and medium sized cities, it
remains to be seen how they will cope with increased demand for water. Already,
in many cities of the developing world, the urban poor are penalised, living
without clean water or adequate sanitation. It is therefore hardly surprising
that one of the "Millennium Development Goals" is committed to halving the
number of people living without clan water and adequate sanitation by 2015.
If this is to be achieved, there is no question that local authorities will
need to initiate comprehensive water management strategies. In the future, UN
-Habitat's research suggests that the urban water crisis will lead to more
political problems and a crisis of governance. Decisions will have to be made to
trade off the competing demands of agriculture, industry and domestic use.
At the same time, local authorities need to ensure greater efficiency in the
use of this precious resource. For example, already, in many cities, both in the
developed and developing world, over 50 per cent of the water is unaccounted
for, often being lost through leakages, this means that local authorities must
opt for stringent water audits and commit themselves to improving infrastructure
and delivery.
The future need not be bleak if one takes into account that in many
developing countries, innovative public/private partnerships, which include
community participation, have helped to rationalise the distribution of water,
leading to overall savings and the delivery of water to the urban poor.
Fiona Harvey: In the short term the simple answer is that it will not be met,
just as it has not been met in the past. In order to meet the enormous demand,
governments will have to think imaginatively. Neither the public sector alone,
nor the private sector, is likely to have all the answers. There must be
partnerships between public sector bodies and private sector companies to bring
clean drinking water, and sewage services, to areas that don't have it. At
present, poor people pay more for drinking water than the rich, because they
often must buy it from street vendors or travel long distances to get the water,
while rich people have a cheap (often state-subsidised) supply piped to their
houses.
What positives can come from the rapid rate of global urbanisation we are
currently experiencing Avi Cohen, Israel
Anna Tibaijuka: Fifty per cent of the world's population now live in cities
and towns and this figure is projected to rise quite steeply within the next few
decades. Though the proportion of people living in cities and towns in North
and South America and Europe has stabilised at 75 per cent of the population, it
is now the turn of Africa and Asia, which though they are still predominantly
rural, will be in for a major demographic shift.
Urbanisation is the direct result of industrialisation and though it led to
slums in Victorian England, and there are currently over one billion slum
dwellers in the world, urbanisation in itself need not be negative. In fact,
throughout history, cities have been centres of creativity and economic growth.
Recent statistics from UN-Habitat's "state of the world cities report" show
that the link between urbanisation and socio-economic development cannot be
disputed. Cities make countries rich. Countries that are highly urbanised have
higher incomes, more stable economies, stronger institutions and are better able
to withstand the volatility of the global economy than those with less urbanised
populations. Urban-based economic activities account for up to 55 per cent of
gross nation product (GNP) in low-income countries, 73 per cent in middle-income
countries and 85 per cent in high income countries.
Cities are also the engines of rural development. They provide many
opportunities for investment, which not only support urban development but also
contribute to rural development in an environment of strong urban-rural
linkages.
Finally, contrary to popular perception, infrastructure investments in urban
areas are not only cost-effective but also environmentally sound. The
concentration of population and enterprises in urban areas greatly reduces the
unit cost of piped water, sewers, drains, roads, electricity, garbage
collection, transport, healthcare, and schools.
Fiona Harvey: People flock to cities partly because that's where they want to
live - with other people, because that's where economic and social
opportunities lie, and it's where people are most likely to gain easy access to
services, such as health services and education. So the move to cities should
not be seen as a bad thing per se, and many people would prefer to live in
cities than in the countryside. But the problem is that most people moving into
growing cities in developing countries will lack basic infrastructure such as
water and electricity, and will find it difficult to get jobs.
The structures that have been set up to aid development in poorer countries
must also change to take account of rapid urbanisation. In the past, a lot of
aid work in the developing world has been focused on the rural poor, but it is
clear that in the future the urban poor will need more and more assistance. That
could bring more positives, in the form of better infrastructure and economic
development in poor cities.
Background
Slumdwellers suffer what MsTibaijuka the human settlements programme, calls
the "urban penalty". She explains: "They have worse health [because of poor
sanitation] and they are affected by the worst effects of industrial pollution.
If there is a flood or a disaster, it's the poor who always suffer."
Ms Tibaijuka wants central government to direct migration better in order to
avoid congestion in the most populous slums. This need not involve controversial
forced clearances; instead, strategies can be developed to help people migrating
from the countryside find shelter in the cities best able to accommodate them,
she argues.
With epidemic disease, overcrowding, malnutrition and crime all growing, how
can urban cities become safer and cleaner places to live? How can we make city
life sustainable against a backdrop of rising urban populations? And with the
strain upon current urban infrastructures, what does this mean for the state of
our cities in the developing world?
___________________________________________________________________________
BBC: Chinese drought affects millions
At least 18 million people have been affected by China's worst drought in 50 years, according to the state news agency Xinhua.
The south-western region of Chongqing has been worst hit, but areas of Sichuan and Liaoning are also affected.
In Chongqing there has been no rain for more than 70 days, and two-thirds of the rivers have dried up, Xinhua said.
Residents in some mountain villages are having to walk up to 2km (1.25 miles) to get water.
At least one person is said to have died from heatstroke, and Xinhua estimates the drought has caused economic losses of 11.74bn yuan ($1.24bn).
Weather extremes
The Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs said on Thursday that in 2006, China had faced its most severe natural disasters for six year.
By 15 August this year, natural disasters had killed 2,006 people, affected more than 316m others and caused economic losses of 160bn yuan ($20bn), the ministry estimated, according to Xinhua.
Earlier this year, some parts of China were hit by heavy snowfall, while in recent months there have been several deadly typhoons, each killing hundreds of people.
This drought is again affecting millions of people. According to Xinhua, 10m people in Sichuan, nearly 8m in Chongqing and 600,000 in Liaoning do not have enough access to drinking water at the moment.
The problem has also affected huge areas of farmland, with crop failures and the death of cattle.
The Sichuan meteorological bureau has forecast that the drought will continue, at least for the next few days.
___________________________________________________________________________
Reuters: China Power Grids Strained by Heat, Drought
CHINA: August 18, 2006
BEIJING - Soaring temperatures and the worst drought in over 50 years have strained power grids in southwestern China and caused blackouts in at least one city in the east, state media reported on Thursday.
Electricity generators have struggled in recent years to match demand during hot months when power-guzzling air-conditioning is turned on, but a slew of new capacity meant there had been hardly any problems reported this summer.
But Hangzhou, capital of coastal Zhejiang province, cut its power supply on Tuesday to avoid breakdown of a key transmission line after power consumption climbed nearly a quarter higher than a year earlier, the Shanghai Daily reported.
Temperatures in the city had nudged 38 degrees Celsius at the start of the week, and demand outpaced supply capacity by around 250 megawatts, the report added.
Neighbouring provinces struggling to keep their own lights on and engines running had no spare power to offer.
In Chongqing, at the centre of a drought that has reduced water levels in the country's longest river to the lowest since records began, businesses were told to suspend production in the afternoon and evening to ease pressure on the network.
Temperatures in the southwestern city exceeded 40 degrees Celsius, after a July when the average temperature stood at 31 degrees Celsius, more than 3 degrees above long-term averages.
But the China Meteorological Administration has forecast a cooler than usual start to the autumn for the city after a warm August.
___________________________________________________________________________
The Daily TelegraphTyphoon hits Japanese island
TYPHOON Wukong slammed today into the southern Japanese island of Kyushu, triggering landslides, cancelling dozens of flights and leading to two deaths and three injuries, officials said.
Wukong, which means Monkey King in Chinese, hit Miyazaki prefecture some 900 kilometres southwest of Tokyo early today and lashed the region with heavy rains, the Japan Meteorological Agency said.
Some 110 people were evacuated from the path of the 10th typhoon of the season but the first to make landfall on the main Japanese islands.
A 66-year-old man was seriously injured in Nagasaki prefecture in northern Kyushu as he broke his hip after falling from the roof where he was fixing gutter downpipes, a police spokesman said.
Two other people were also injured on Kyushu today, while a surfer and an angler died yesterday in rough weather conditions caused by Wukong, police said. Another angler was missing.
The typhoon also caused seven landslides, cut roads at three points and damaged three houses on the southwestern island, he said.
As of 1.40pm (1440 AEST), the typhoon was located over Nagasaki prefecture, packing winds up to 83 kilometres per hour.
It was moving northwest at a speed of 15 kilometres per hour, sweeping over Kyushu, the agency said, adding that it was likely to head toward South Korea.
Japan Airlines cancelled at least 31 flights while All Nippon Airways called off 34 flights.
Several local train services were suspended on Kyushu.
Passenger ships were also cancelled between Fukuoka, Kyushu's biggest population centre, and South Korea's second largest city Busan.
___________________________________________________________________________
Bloomberg.com:Tropical Storm Hits Japan's Kyushu; Flights Cancelled (Update2)
Aug. 18 (Bloomberg) -- Tropical Storm Wukong made landfall near Miyazaki city on the western Japanese island of Kyushu early this morning, bringing heavy rains and thunderstorms, the Japan Meteorological Agency reported.
Wukong, with maximum sustained winds of 83 kilometers per hour (52 miles), was about 112 kilometers south of the city of Fukuoka at 4 p.m. and had almost stopped moving, the weather agency said. The storm is forecast to skirt Fukuoka, with a population of 1.4 million people, early tomorrow.
Japan is regularly buffeted by tropical storms and typhoons, which left scores dead in 2004. Wukong, named after the Monkey King in the Chinese novel Journey to the West, crossed land shortly after 1 a.m. and brought rains of 55 millimeters (2.1 inches) per hour, Kyodo news reported. Three people were injured and 500 were forced to leave their homes, it said.
Heavy rain, flood, storm and high wave warnings are in affect for all of Kyushu and parts of adjacent Honshu, Japan's weather agency said.
Japan Airlines Corp. and All Nippon Airways Co., the country's two largest carriers, canceled at least 36 domestic flights, they said.
Idemitsu Kosan Co., Japan's second-biggest petroleum refiner, Cosmo Oil Co. and Kyushu Oil Co. and halted oil product shipments from three refineries as Wukong approached. The storm caused blackouts in 200 households in Miyazaki prefecture, Kyodo reported, citing Kyushu Electric Power Co.
Postponing Services
Kyushu Railway Co., postponed services on five lines including one that crosses Kyushu, the company said on its Web site. Long distance ferries connecting Kagoshima and Miyazaki with Osaka were also halted, the Asahi newspaper reported.
Typhoon Saomai last week brushed past the southern Japanese island chain of Okinawa on its way to China, where at least 214 people were killed and more than 50,000 houses damaged or destroyed.
At least 20 people died in September last year when Typhoon Nabi hit southwestern Japan. A record 10 typhoons and tropical storms hit Japan in 2004, killing scores of people and causing billions of dollars of damage.
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
Share with your friends: |