The International Correspondence Chess Federation 2014 Congress Sydney, Australia Table of Contents


International Correspondence Chess Federation



Download 1.23 Mb.
Page26/34
Date14.07.2017
Size1.23 Mb.
#23286
1   ...   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   ...   34

International Correspondence Chess Federation


Ian M Pheby

Aspirer Tournament Organiser

ian.pheby@tiscali.co.uk

Report to the 2014 Congress

Aspirer Tournaments
11th August 2014

Dear Chessfriends,


Introduction
I would like to apologise for not being able to present this report in person. As you may know, I have a total fear of flying, and I am thus unable to attend Congress unless it is held within mainland United Kingdom. I did have the pleasure of meeting many of you at the Leeds Congress in 2009, which I attended. I am pleased to submit my first report as Tournament Organiser of the Aspirer tournaments to the 2014 ICCF Congress. The period of this report will be from the start of these events in November 2013 through to 11th August 2014.
Aspirer Tournaments
The Aspirer tournaments enables players who are new to the ICCF, without an ICCF rating or have ICCF ratings of less than 1600 to participate within ICCF events where they are not likely to be outclassed. They therefore should get some enjoyable games and hopefully become quite active within the ICCF family. Players may register either via their National Federation or through the Direct Entry Programme.
Aspirer Tournament Entries
Since these tournaments were introduced in November 2013, I have to date received 154 entries, which have been split into 22 separate events. This is an excellent return in the first year of this tournament. Of these 22 events, some 9 are already complete.
Appendix 1 contains details of the breakdown of the entries.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the ICCF continue to offer Aspirer events in the future. I am sure they will continue to be successful.
Appreciation
I wish to thank Andrew Dearnley (ENG) for seeking the agreement of the ICCF to hold this type of tournament. Finally, I would like to thank my Tournament Directors for their hard work in these events. The Tournament Directors are:
SIM Biedermann, Thomas (USA); Kain, Tony (USA); Sherwood, Russell (WLS); Tseng, Wilbur (USA)

Ian M Pheby

TO, Aspirer tournaments

Appendix 1 – Aspirer Entries


1. Entries
Total entries though National Federations = 33
Total entries through the Direct Entry Programme = 120
Total entries by Zonal Director = 1
Total = 154

2. Entries by National Federation


Number of National Federations = 31

Australia = 11 Austria = 2 Belgium = 1 Canada = 11


Chile = 2 Cape Verde = 1 Egypt = 1 England = 15
Finland = 1 France = 4 Germany = 6 Ireland = 4
Italy = 2 Japan = 1 Jordan = 1 Luxembourg = 3
Mexico = 1 Netherlands = 2 Norway = 2 Panama = 1
Poland = 3 Russia = 1 Scotland = 8 South Africa = 1
Spain = 3 Sweden = 1 Switzerland = 6 Turkey = 4
USA = 52 Venezuela = 1 Wales = 2
Postal Tournament Office Report


iccflog2000_35mm1



POSTAL

TOURNAMENT

OFFICE

COMMISSIONER


THE INTERNATIONAL CORRESPONDENCE CHESS FEDERATION
Gian-Maria Tani

via Tripoli 20

I-10136 Torino

Italia

tel.: +39-3495519830

E -mail: pto@iccf.com


REPORT OF THE PTO COMMISSIONER
Year 2013

The number of postal correspondence players is always very low, but 2013 was a good year for Promotional Postal Tournaments. In 2013, I started 22 sections (6 WT/M, 7 WT/H, and 9 WT/O) with 100 players, while in 2012 the players were 98.


Year 2014

In the first 8 months of 2014, I started 14 sections (2 WT/M, 5 WT/H, and 7 WT/O) with 50 players.

I expect to have in the whole 2014 the same number of tournaments and players as in 2013 and 2012.
Countries and Zones

The players of 2013 postal world tournaments came from 19 different countries (while in 2012 the number of countries was 16). As usual, most of the players were from Europe (78%); the other ones come from NAPZ (21%) and Africa/Asia (1%). Unfortunately, we had no players from Latin/America. The most players came from Germany (44); the second and the third most players came from the USA (14) and Italy (7), while in 2012 the third country was France.


ICCF Diamond Jubilee Postal World Cup 19

The Final of this important tournament was started on 1/07/2014 (T.D.: Laurent Tinture -FRA- with 13 players (7 from Germany, 1 from Czech Rep., England, Italy, Poland, Romania, and Spain).


Tournament Directors

As usual, many thanks to “my” Tournament Directors (Rubens Battistini, Bjørn Brobakken and Thed Klauner for the Promotional Tournaments; Rubens Battistini, Bjørn Brobakken, Markus Hömske, Joop Jansen, Thed Klauner, Leo Lahdenmàki, Ian Pheby and Laurent Tinture for the Preliminaries and the Final of the Diamond Jubilee) for their excellent work!


Amici sumus!
Gian-Maria Tani
ICCF Promotion Tournament Entries
ICCF entries received until 31 August 2014



Year

Number

2007

879

2008

1548

2009

1568

2010

1576

2011

1573

2012

1598

2013

1727

2014

994 (*)


Year

Class O

Class H

Class M

2007

330

213

336

2008

563

343

642

2009

565

394

609

2010

604

325

647

2011

604

366

603

2012

647

358

593

2013

765

396

566

2014

395 (*)

224 (*)

375 (*)

(*) 2014 only from 01.01.2014 to 31.08.2014



Title Tournament Commissioner


iccflog2000_35mm1



TITLE

TOURNAMENT

COMMISSIONER



THE INTERNATIONAL CORRESPONDENCE CHESS FEDERATION
Gian-Maria Tani

via Tripoli 20

I-10136 Torino

Italia

tel.: +39-3495519830

E -mail: ttc@iccf.com


1. WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS
1.1 WCCC Finals

The Final of the 27th WCCC ended on 9/05/2014. The new World Champion is Aleksandr Surenovich Dronov (RUS), who was already the 22nd World Champion; Matthias Kribben (GER) was the runner-up and Thomas Mahling (GER) got the third place.


There is still one running game in the Final of the 26th WCCC. The winner, Ron Langeveld (NED), is already known. The runner-up is Florin Şerban (ROU) and Rafael Leitão has the third place.
The Final of the 28th WCCC, started on 10/06/2013, is going on regularly, with 60% of the games already finished.
1.2 WCCC Candidates’ Tournaments

The Sections of the 31st, the 32nd, and the 33rd WCCC (started in 2011, 2012, and 2013) are going on regularly.

The 2014 Sections (34th WCCC) are regularly starting on 20/09/2014 (4 Sections with 44 players).
1.3 WCCC Semifinals

The Sections of the 36th and the 37th WCCC (started in 2012 and 2013) are going on regularly.

The 2014 Sections (38th WCCC) were started on 20/06/2014 (9 Sections with 117 players).
1.4 WCCC Preliminaries

The Sections of the 36th and the 37th WCCC (started in 2012 and 2013) are going on regularly.

The 2014 Sections (38th WCCC) were started on 20/03/2014 (15 Sections with 195 players).
2. LADIES’ WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS
2.1 LWCCC Finals

There are still 3 running games in the Final of the 9th LWCCC.

They have been sent to adjudication: the name of the new Ladies’ World Champion will be soon known.
2.2 LWCCC Semifinals

All the Semifinals of the 10th LWCCC have ended in 2013.

It was not possible to start the Final because the qualified players from 9th LWCCC Final were not known.


3. OLYMPIADS
3.1 CC Olympiads Finals

The Final of the 16th Olympiad (postal) is still ongoing. There are still 6 running games, but the winner team is already known: the Czech Republic. The runner-up is Germany, while many teams are fighting for the third place.

The Final of the 18th Olympiad (webserver), started on 10/12/2012, is going on regularly.
3.2 CC Olympiads Preliminaries

The Semifinals of the 19th Olympiad (postal) are still ongoing, with a lot of running games.

The Semifinals of the 20th Olympiad (webserver), started on 10/12/2012, are going on regularly.

4. LADIES’ OLYMPIADS
The 9th Ladies’ Olympiad ended on 11/01/2014. The team winner was Russia, Lithuania was the runner-up, and Germany got the third place.

5. GRAND MASTER NORM TOURNAMENTS
4 GMN Sections were started in 2013, the same as in 2012.

3 GMN Sections have been started in the first 8 months of 2014.

Unfortunately, the waiting time is very high.

6. MASTER NORM TOURNAMENTS
16 MN Sections were started in 2013 (in 2012 the MN Sections were 14).

9 MN Sections have been started in the first 8 months of 2014.

The waiting time is quite low.

7. NEXT NORM TOURNAMENTS TO BE STARTED
7.1 WCCC Final

The Final of the 29th WCCC is planned to start on June 2015.


7.2 WCCC Candidates’ Tournaments

The Candidates’ Tournament of the 35th WCCC is planned to start on September 2015.


7.3 WCCC Semifinales

The Semifinals of the 39th WCCC are planned to start on June 2015.


7.4 WCCC Preliminaries

The Preliminaries of the 39th WCCC are planned to start on March 2015.


7.5 Ladies’ World Championships

The Final of the 10th LWCCC is planned to start on 20/11/2014 together with the Semifinals of the 11th LWCCC.



7.6 Olympiads

The Final of the 19th Olympiad, played by post, will start when the Final of the 16th Olympiad will be ended and the qualified teams will be known.


The Congress is requested to confirm or to dismiss the 21st Olympiad played by post.
A proposal could be to start the Postal Olympiad in 2016, together with the Semifinals of the 22nd Olympiad played on ICCF webserver.


7.7 Ladies’ Olympiads

The 10th Ladies’ Olympiad is planned to start on the second quarter of 2015.



8. THANKS

At the end of my report, I would like to thanks all the friends who help me in this important and difficult work, especially “my” deputy, Neil Limbert and the Direct Entry Commissioner, Ian M. Pheby.


A special and warm thank to my great friend Carlos Flores Gutiérrez, who decided to retire from his office of TD for health reasons. His excellent work as one of our best Postal TDs will be sorely missed.
In addition, finally yet importantly, I want to thank all the Tournament Directors: without their daily work, it would not be possible for our players to enjoy their favourite hobby!

Amici sumus!




Torino, 28/08/2014.

firma gian- 002



Tournament Rules Commission




THE INTERNATIONAL CORRESPONDENCE CHESS FEDERATION
Chairman of the Rules Commission: Per Söderberg

Holbergsgatan 72, S-16849 Bromma

: per.soderberg@schack.se



Report – Tournament Rules Commission
ICCF Congress Sydney (Australia) 2014

List of the members of the PRC:


Per Söderberg (SWE) Acting Chairman

Duncan Chambers (ENG) Vice Chairman

Gian-Maria Tani (ITA)

Sergey Grodzensky (RUS)

Leonardo Madonia (ITA)

Gerhard Binder (GER)

Eric Ruch (FRA) ICCF President, member in all Commissions

Michael Millstone (USA) General Secretary, member in all Commissions


Since last, Ralph Marconi and Gianni Mastrojeni have asked to step down from the Commission. Ralph and Gianni are heartily thanked for their dedicated work for the Commission during a long time of service. As there is a proposal to join the two Rules Commission into one, no replacement has been sought.

Duncan Chambers asked to be relieved from the duty as Chairman of this Commission, he will stay on the Commission, and I took over the Chair for this report. We give our appreciated thanks to Duncan for his years as Chairman of the Commission, great work!



Discussions:

There are 5 Tournament Rules Proposals for ICCF Congress 2014:
1)

Flag Fall Forfeit

United States

Replace the following section of 8.7

(a) Exceeding the time limit is valid only if it is confirmed by the Tournament Director (if a player agrees that he has exceeded the first time limit, this takes effect only after confirmation by The Tournament Director).

With


(a) Exceeding the time limit is valid only if it is confirmed by the ICCF server.


Title: Flag Fall

Scope: Tournament Rules, Webserver

Proposed by: United States

Proposal:

Replace the following section of 8.7



(a) Exceeding the time limit is valid only if it is confirmed by the Tournament Director (if a player agrees that he has exceeded the first time limit, this takes effect only after confirmation by The Tournament Director).

With


(a) Exceeding the time limit is valid only if it is confirmed by the ICCF server.

Rationale:

ICCF Playing Rules Server 6) Time Allowed and Penalties d. A competitor who has exceeded the time allowed shall forfeit the game.

The proposal would make the Playing Rules and Tournament Rules consistent. There is no need to involve the TD or create delays when the server can simply set the score for the game.

Comments:

Appeal procedures allow for exceptional circumstances, like a health emergency.

Another possible concern is the IMR (Insufficient Material Rule), an important part of blitz competition or in a time scramble heading to time control in normal OTB.  In such positions, there may only be seconds to make 10-20 moves.  In blitz, you will see people play into the IMR, giving up material to take the last pawn (or a Rook) when short on time.
Part of the reason for the IMR is the difficulty in stopping play to get a decision.  An OTB player is allowed to stop the clocks and seek an arbitrator (see below).  However, this is almost never done unless the arbitrator is standing over monitoring the game, because there is a penalty provision. The penalty would logically be the time wasted searching for the arbitrator or a proscribed penalty time in blitz.  Thus, flag falls in IMR positions are more common as the player tend play on until time control or a flag-fall.

FIDE 6.12d: If a player stops the chess clock in order to seek the arbiter’s assistance, the arbiter shall determine whether the player had any valid reason for doing so. If the player had no valid reason for stopping the chess clock, the player shall be penalised in accordance with Article 12.9.

Time rules in ICCF are already much different, for example, no time expires in the first 24 hours, giving plenty of time to get the TDs attention in unusual situations.  In addition, IMR positions are relatively simple so playing a couple moves "short on time" is not hard while waiting for a decision. It is also unlikely to occur in CC, where a player can offer a draw to an opponent with insufficient mating material, rather than allowing his own flag to fall.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Comments:


The Tournament Rules Commission did vote on this proposal as 4 against and one in favour. One problem is that Tournament Rules are general for all ICCF events, and in postal events, it will be necessary with a TD as the games are not monitored by the server. Further, it was identified that the case where a player has withdrawn – as discussed in Cracow – it is necessary for him to claim the win. If he does not, the result will be scored as 0-0. The TD is also responsible for the play in the event and this will make it difficult to change any “decision” made by the server and as Appeals Instance shall only check if the TD has made a mistake an ETL decision by the server will not be possible to appeal. Please check the Playing Rules recommendation on the subject of automation. The TRC recommendation is against this proposal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

2)


Minimum Score for Titles

Poland

Normally there is requirement for minimum score for all international titles, for example 30% in Poland or 35% in FIDE. For ICCF events currently there is no minimum, so in extreme cases it is enough 10% or even less. The minimum required to be discussed and possibly decided during congress meeting.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Comments:
This proposal had an even vote in the TRC. And thus it seems to be an issue for the Congress to decide. The TRC will not give a recommendation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

3)


Titles Achieved in National Championships

Poland

The final stage of the national individual or team championship shall be exempt and international title norms possible if other requirements fulfilled. However, at least one of the norms has to be achieved under normal foreigner requirement. In my opinion, ICCF can implement this FIDE standard.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Comments:
This proposal received 3 votes against and one in favour. The idea as such is possible, but we also have the case of Myanmar (Burma) in FIDE where one federation fixed their games to get a very high rating not corresponding to the player’s actual skill. We do not wish that to happen that a player gets a title by playing only domestic players do we.

It also came up a proposal that if a national federation do wish to have a titled championship, then a format of playing with 10 domestic players and 5 invited players from other federations would work.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
4)

Tournament Rules – Unexpected Substantial Change During Update Process

Poland

Appendix II, International Correspondence Chess Title Regulations [1.e) & 3.]

An international tournament shall have the following requirements:

e) not more than two thirds of the participating players shall be members of one and the same ICCF affiliated federation
3. The minimum game scores for title results shall be by virtue of the following table of points, where

C = the maximum number of players being members of one and the same federation.


Title of Proposal: Tournament Rules – Unexpected Substantial Change during Update Process

Proposed By: Poland/Qualification Commissioner

Proposal and Comments:
Appendix II, International Correspondence Chess Title Regulations [1.e) & 3.]

1. An international tournament shall have the following requirements:

e) not more than two thirds of the participating players shall be members of one and the same ICCF affiliated federation
3. The minimum game scores for title results shall be by virtue of the following table of points, where

C = the maximum number of players being members of one and the same federation,
Being QC I am responsible for ICCF title tournaments in terms of providing guarantee that ICCF rules are observed by both players & TOs.I didn't realize that requirements for title tournaments, valid for several years, were changed substantially until worried organizers pointed that out. I investigated the issue and present my findings below (see also details in separate pdf file attached).
The issue is that at some stage of TR update in 2011 somebody, probably believing that an error existed, replaced expression "C = The minimum number of players not belonging to one and the same federation" with "C = the maximum number of players being members of one and the same federation". In fact these are two different expressions with totally different meanings. Numbers in column C were mixed as well and are still incompatible with column description.

Some people may say that this was just update to eliminate a double negative and that these expressions mean the same or the first one is nonsense, because the minimum is 1! You couldn't be more wrong!

"The minimum number of players not belonging to one and the same federation" actually means the minimum number of different federations represented in an event!

Moreover, I could not find in the minutes authorization for that substantial change.


See just few examples:
-MT-Tolush (http://www.iccf-webchess.com/event?id=41401) started in 2014 -> 11xRUS; TR 2014 says in para 1.e) max 11, but in para 3 (norm table, column C): max 6!

-MT-Paredes/A (http://www.iccf-webchess.com/event?id=43536) started in 2014 -> 6xESP; TR 2014 says in para 1.e) max 10, but in para 3 (norm table, column C): max 5!

-MT-Hawley (http://www.iccf-webchess.com/event?id=40274) started in 2013 -> 7xENG; TR 2013 says in para 1.e) max 10, but in para 3 (norm table, column C): max 5!

-RUS/Gold-2013 (http://iccf-webchess.com/event?id=39862) started in 2013 -> 10xRUS; TR 2013 says in para 1.e) max 10, but in para 3 (norm table, column C): max 5!

-MT-Crusi/A (http://www.iccf.com/event?id=37645) started in 2013 -> 6xESP; TR 2013 says in para 1.e) max 10, but in para 3 (norm table, column C): max 5!

-MT-Crusi/B (http://www.iccf.com/event?id=37646) started in 2013 -> 6xESP; TR 2013 says in para 1.e) max 10, but in para 3 (norm table, column C): max 5!

-RUS/Gold-2012 (http://iccf-webchess.com/event?id=32258) started in 2012 -> 9xRUS; TR 2014 says in para 1.e) max 10, but in para 3 (norm table, column C): max 5! However, exceptionally for TR 2012 para 3 (norm table, column C) says about: (page 21) min or (page 19) max 10 depending on page you are looking at!

My advice as QC is to correct table description for column C as following "C = The minimum number of players not belonging to one and the same federation" (for all editions TR 2014, 2013, 2012-including numbers in column C), so like was previously.


Whatever you decide all title tournaments starting from 2012 have to be verified with regard to that issue and norms for international titles to be validated (or not).
If you insist anyway to follow rules as it is, several events need to be corrected and downgraded to rated only. In result, title norms have to be cancelled, if applicable.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Comments:


This editorial issue has been taken care of by updating the table on the server.

No action from TRC is needed.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
5)

Team Captain Options – My Claims

Poland

"My claims" - claim to be accepted (or rejected) by TC is missing.

Contact possibility TC with another TC in team events is missing. This prevents TC from his basic privilege and obligation to solve problem before reporting it to TD.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Comments:
The Tournament Rules Commission feels that this is an issue for the server commission. It has no impact to the Tournament Rules.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
_________________________________________________________

I would like to thank all members of the TRC for their dedicated and cooperative work and input!

Kind Regards and Amici Sumus

Per Söderberg, Acting Chairman of the TRC

Bromma, Sept 1st 2014



Download 1.23 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   ...   34




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page