The spirit of jezebel, the mystery of iniquity and The strong delusion editor: The Ineffable, Unbegotten Creator yahuah
Usurp definition: usurped, usurping, usurps
Download 1.22 Mb.
|
Usurp definition: usurped, usurping, usurps1. To seize and hold (the power or rights of another, for example) by force or without legal authority. 2. To take over or occupy without right: usurp a neighbour's land. 3. To take the place of (another) without legal authority; supplant, to seize another's place, authority, or possession wrongfully. Also Saul was present if not ‘in charge of’, the murder of the Apostle Stephen! Acts 7, 54-60: ‘When they heard these things, they were cut to the heart, and they gnashed on him with their teeth. But he, being full of the Holy Ghost, looked up steadfastly into heaven, and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing on the right hand of God, and said, Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God. Then they cried out with a loud voice, and stopped their ears, and ran upon him with one accord, and cast him out of the city, and stoned him: and the witnesses laid down their clothes at a young man's feet, whose name was Saul. And he kneeled down, and cried with a loud voice, Lord; lay not this sin to their charge. And when he had said this, he fell asleep. Matthew 16. 1- 12: ‘The Pharisees also with the Sadducees came, and tempting desired him that he would show them a sign from heaven. He answered and said unto them, “When it is evening, ye say, It will be fair weather: for the sky is red. And in the morning, it will be foul weather today: for the sky is red and lowering. Oh you hypocrites, you can discern the face of the sky; but can ye not discern the signs of the times? (The Church is asleep) A wicked and adulterous (Fornicating) generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas”. And he left them, and departed. And when his disciples were come to the other side, they had forgotten to take bread. Then Yahushua said to them, “Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees”. And they reasoned among themselves, saying, it is because we have taken no bread. Which when Yahushua perceived, he said unto them, “Oh you of little faith, why reason you among yourselves, because you have brought no bread? Do ye not yet understand, neither remember the five loaves of the five thousand, and how many baskets you took up? Neither the seven loaves of the four thousand, and how many baskets you took up? How is it that you do not understand that I spoke it not to you concerning bread, that you should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees? Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees. ‘The sign of the prophet Jonas’ – Have you ever been instructed as to what this really is? Just as Jonah refused the truth and the voice of God, running in the opposite direction; so have the rebellious Children of God turned and ran away in these last days! However the Great Shepherd promised that he would call his sheep from out of the flock. So just like Jonah was brought back to face the truth and his calling, true believers will be called from out of the apostate church and back into the will and grace of their Father. ‘Do ye not yet understand, neither remember the five loaves of the five thousand, and how many baskets ye took up? Neither the seven loaves of the four thousand, and how many baskets ye took up? – The ‘5’ loaves and the ‘7’ loaves represented the ‘12’ apostles that would spread the gospel of the kingdom by feeding them the ‘bread of heaven’ and bring many back into the truth. Yahushua was ‘the Word’ that gives the ‘Bread of Life’. It was also a picture of ‘whatever a man sows, that shall he reap’ or whenever true ‘Bread’ is given out – yet even more we shall receive! beware of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees – Be careful when you listen to the teachings of the religious leaders. Acts 22. 3: ‘I am verily a man which am a Jew, born in Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, yet brought up in this city at the feet of Gamaliel, and taught according to the perfect manner of the law of the fathers, and was zealous toward God. Tarsus – In Hebrew, the number 666 is identified by the Hebrew letters TRSV; T=400, R=200, S=60, V=6 which total 666. TRSV is pronounced TARSU. at the feet of Gamaliel – From the ‘online Wikipedia’: Gamaliel the Elder, or Rabbi Gamaliel I, was the grandson of the great Jewish teacher Hillel the Elder. He was a leading authority in the Sanhedrin in the mid first century. He died nine years before the destruction of Jerusalem (63 AD). In the Talmud, this Gamaliel bears the title ‘Rabban’, a rabbinic title given to the Nasi (head) of the Sanhedrin, of which he is the first of seven appointed leaders of that school of Hillel which earned the title. He figures in two anecdotes as the religious adviser of Agrippa I and his wife Cypris. Of his teaching, beyond the saying (preserved in Aboth i.16), which enjoins the duty of study and of scrupulousness in the observance of religious ordinances… Gamaliel I held a reputation of one of the greatest teachers in the annals of Judaism. Mish. Sorah ix.15 pays tribute to this quality, "Since Rabban Gamaliel the Elder died there has been no more reverence for the law, and purity and abstinence died out at the same time." While believing the law to be wholly inspired by God, he ruled that the sabbath laws should be less rigorous and more realistic. He also argued that the law should protect women during divorce and urged Jews to be kind towards Gentiles. In Acts of the Apostles, Gamaliel is described as a Pharisee and celebrated scholar of the Mosaic Law. In Acts (5:34), citing past revolts based on the prophesied messiah such as Theudas and Judas of Galilee, Gamaliel advises his fellow-members of the Sanhedrin not to put to death Saint Peter and the Apostles for preaching the Gospel. His advice was acted upon, so great was his authority with his contemporaries. He is also treated as the originator of many legal ordinances; as the father of a son, whom he called Simeon, after his father's name, and of a daughter who married the priest Simon ben Nathanael. (22:3), It is also stated that he was the teacher of St. Paul. In Acts 22:3 Paul tells a crowd in Jerusalem, "I am a Jew, born in Tarsus in Cilicia, but brought up in this city, educated at the feet of Gamaliel according to the strict manner of the law of our fathers, being zealous for God as all of you are this day." But we are told nothing about the nature or the extent of the influence which he exercised upon the future apostle of the Gentiles. Shabbath 30b mentions a student of Gamaliel I, who displayed ‘impudence in learning’ a person some scholars identify as possibly referring to Paul. Other scholars, such as Helmut Koester, are doubtful that Paul studied under this famous rabbi. What is important is his association with him. So he states that he is a Jew, born in Tarsus (Under Roman rule at that time) and his teacher (If he was telling the truth) may well have been Gamlaliel, the Pharacee and originator of many of the church’s rituals that we have today. This would explain Saul’s teaching a relaxation of the Laws. Acts 22. 25-29: ‘And as they bound him with thongs, Paul said unto the centurion that stood by, Is it lawful for you to scourge a man that is a Roman, and uncondemned? When the centurion heard that, he went and told the chief captain, saying, Take heed what thou doest: for this man is a Roman. Then the chief captain came, and said unto him, “Tell me, art thou a Roman”? He said, Yea. And the chief captain answered, “With a great sum obtained I this freedom”. And Paul said, “But I was free born”. Then straightway they departed from him which should have examined him: and the chief captain also was afraid, after he knew that he was a Roman, and because he had bound him. 2 Corinthians 11. 22: ‘Are they Hebrews? so am I. Are they Israelites? so am I. Are they the seed of Abraham? so am I’. Acts 24. 4-5: ‘My manner of life from my youth, which was at the first among mine own nation at Jerusalem, know all the Jews; Which knew me from the beginning, if they would testify, that after the most straightest sect of our religion I lived a Pharisee’. Ok Saul – Which are you, Jew or Roman? We know he was from the tribe of Benjamin and a Pharisee. A chameleon is what he was and a agent of Rome being the lead usurper. Genesis 49. 27: ‘Benjamin shall ravage as a wolf: in the morning he shall devour the prey, and at night he shall divide the spoil’. Philippians 3. 5: ‘Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee; Romans 11. 1: ‘I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin. Acts 13. 21: ‘And afterward they desired a king: and God gave unto them Saul the son of Cis (Kish in 1 Samuel 9 and 10), a man of the tribe of Benjamin. It was King Saul from the tribe of Benjamin, which disobeyed the command of Yahuah and hearkened to the voice of men instead. He allowed the best of the spoils to be kept by the men, when commanded to utterly destroy everything to do with the Amalekites. A vital clue is hidden in these next two verses. Yahushua first warns not just of the leaven (Gas that becomes trapped as bubbles within the dough) but this also: Mark 8. 15: ‘And he charged them, saying, Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod. What was the ‘leaven’ of Herod’ then? Acts 12. 1-4: ‘Now about that time Herod the king stretched forth his hands to vex certain of the church. And he killed James the brother of John with the sword. And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also (Then was the days of unleavened bread). And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people. Matthew 14. 3: ‘For Herod had laid hold on John, and bound him, and put him in prison for Herodias sake, his Brother Philip's wife. Now keep in mind that Saul had kept company with this same Herod. What does Saul do not long after? Galatians 2. 1: ‘Then fourteen years after I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas (Another who spent time with Herod!), and took Titus (A Greek) with me also. Galatians 2. 11-14: ‘But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed. For before that certain came from James, he did eat with the Gentiles: but when they were come, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing them which were of the circumcision. And the other Jews dissembled likewise with him; insomuch that Barnabas also was carried away with their dissimulation. But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews? Saul/Paul had just done to Peter the same as Herod (to vex certain of the church)! Herod killed James and took Peter prisoner because it pleased the Jews! Then there’s John the Baptist of course. Saul proceeds to verbally assault Peter just because he was in front of alot of Jews (And because he saw it pleased the Jews) and he liked to please people whoever they were (See below 1Corinthians 10. 31-33). Just as Herod did evil to the true Disciples and Apostles, to please persons. Anyone who associated with Herod then, would effectively be infected with the Leaven of Herod! Whatever Herod’s ways and methods were, his friends would surely follow suit. Acts 13. 1-3: ‘In the church at Antioch there were prophets and teachers Barnabas, Simeon called Niger, Lucius of Cyrene, Manaen who had been brought up with Herod the tetrarch and Saul. Matthew 16. 16-19: ‘And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. And Yahushua answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven. And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock (Not ‘the man’ but the fact of ‘who’ Yahushua was) I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. We will soon see more of ‘the Leaven of Herod’ in action! It’s also interesting to note that Saul’s favourite travelling companion ‘Titus’ who is said to have been a Greek, is the same ‘Roman General Titus’ that put down the Jewish rebellion in 70AD. The first Jewish-Roman War (66–73), sometimes called The Great Revolt. The famous ‘Arch of Titus’ still stands in Rome: it depicts Roman legionaries carrying off the Temple of Jerusalem's treasuries, including the ‘menorah’. Titus set up the Cherubim, captured from the Jewish temple, over one of the gates in Antioch. Antioch is crucial to unravelling this strangle-weed that chokes the truth of the Gospel of the Kingdom! So who was this Scribe called Luke, Saul’s travelling companion? Some very interesting facts are revealed in a simple ‘Wikipedia’ online search. This will blow some Church-going minds for sure! LUKE: APOSTLE OR APOSTATE? (Once again from the online Wikipedia) Luke (Christendom’s 4th gospel writer) is a Syrian of Antioch, a Syrian by race, a physician by profession. He had become a disciple of Saul until his [Saul's] so-called martyrdom. Having served the Lord continuously, unmarried and without children, filled with the Holy Spirit he died at the age of 84 years. (Edit: cough cough). Some manuscripts add that Luke died ‘in Thebes, the capital of Boeotia’. All of these facts support the conclusion that Luke was associated with Paul. Later tradition elaborates on these few facts. Epiphanius states that Luke was one of the Seventy-(Two) (Panarion 51.11), and John Chrysostom indicates at one point that the ‘brother’ Paul mentions in 2 Corinthians 8:18 is either Luke or Barnabas (Later rewarded with the position of ‘Bishop of Milan’. Mr J. Wenham asserts that Luke was one of ‘the Seventy’ (See below later), the Emmaus disciple, Lucius of Cyrene (See later) and Paul's kinsman. Not all scholars are as confident of all of these attributes as Wenham is, not least because Luke's own statement at the beginning of Acts freely admits that he was not an eyewitness to the events of the Gospel. This confirms then that LUKE was NOT A TRUE APOSTLE! According to the rules set out in Acts 1. 21-22. To be an Apostle, someone had to have been a companion of Yahushua the ‘entire’ time he walked the earth and been a witness to his ressurection! Antioch was a major centre of worship dedicated to Apollo (The Revelation ch9 - Apollyon) and Daphne (Diana Queen of Heaven/Lilith). Alexander the Great made altars to Zeus (Tammuz/Molech) there around 400AD. Luke was a worshiper of the Satanic Trinity of Babylon! The Deities just had different names. He was not a ‘Jew of Antioch’, which tried to stone Saul and Barnabus, Herod’s buddies! Jesus is a translation of Zeus (More of a play on words really) – Concordance 2424, original word ʼnhsou', The original coming from the Hebrew [wXwhy - meaning - Yahowshuwa; transliterated to ‘Iesous’. Phonetic spelling - ee-ay-sooce. Zeus is in both Hebrew and Greek the latter ‘A’ meaning - that he is the beginning and the end; Phonetic spelling – ‘dzyooce’ very similar to ‘Iesous’ when it comes to pronouncing it. So Jesus is a deliberate translation alteration. Once the real name of Messiah is discovered, it is just plain rude to keep calling him something else! How would you feel if the people who say they love you, kept calling you a different name. His honouring ‘good intent’ through ignorance will not last forever. Also vital to remember is that when Satan turns up here in the flesh again, he will come as ‘Jesus’ not Yahushua! So the sooner people make that clear definition, the better there chances of not being deceived by the ‘false Jesus’. Definition: Jesus = Jehovah is salvation (Note: Jehovah = ‘the existing One’, also suggestive of the plural. The true name of the living Father is YAHUAH (the PRE-existent one!) That is the name that he has decided we are to know him by. The "J" in "Jehovah" is a result of Martin Luther's rendering of the Biblical Hebrew name יְהֹוָה in his German translation of the Masoretic Text, which was already in the hands of the Pharasees. Some, but not all modern scholars believe that the original pronunciation of the ‘Tetragrammaton’ may have been lost somewhere in the first millennium (What a coincidence!), when the Jewish people stopped saying the name, out of fear of violating the commandment "You shall not take the name of YHWH your God in vain" (Exodus 20:7). By then though the Pharasees had taken control of the texts and the oral laws, by the strange ordination of Eleazar (See topic titles ‘Eleazar’ and ‘Gameliel’). Jesus, the Son of God, the Saviour of mankind, God incarnate (So was Zeus to them! Zeus is Tammuz of Babylon. Satan incarnated in the body of Tammuz (See later). Jesus Barabbas was the captive robber whom the Jews begged Pilate to release instead of Yahushua. Also there was Jesus surnamed Justus, a Jewish Christian, an associate with Paul in the preaching of the gospel of grace and lawlessness. Adonai Jews also call God Adonai, Hebrew for ‘Lord’ (Hebrew: אֲדֹנָי). Formally, this is plural ("my Lords"), but the plural is usually construed as a respectful, and not a syntactic (relating to) plural. The singular form is Adoni: "my lord". This was used by the Phoenicians for the god Tammuz and is the origin of the Greek name Adonis. Jews only use the singular to refer to a distinguished person). Since pronouncing YHWH is considered sinful, Jews use Adonai instead in prayers, and colloquially (appropriately) would use Hashem (The Name). When the Masoretes added vowel pointings to the text of the Hebrew Bible in the first century (Of course they did), they gave the word YHWH the vowels of Adonai, to remind the reader to say Adonai instead. Thereby getting people to redirect their worship of the Most High to Satan. LORD refers to Yahushua but Lord refers to BAAL! The Jesus referred to in the New Testament is none other than Zeus (Tammuz) the son of Cronus (Nimrod of Babylon). Quite a clever switch really. The implications for Christendom though are the worst imaginable!! Deceiving people into praising and praying to Jesus all the time instead of YAHUAH in Yahushua’s name, is simply switched to praising and praying to THE DEVIL HIMSELF!! Do you really think Satan cares how he receives his praise? Deception has always been his favourite method. JESUS IS NOT YAHUSHUA. They are playing esoteric mind-games with Christendom and have been ever since the crucifixion! It fits with everything that’s wrong with Christendom today! Hence the SUN-day worship and the pagan festivals, so of course Christmas and Easter are acceptable to the churches! They (Unwittingly hopefully) all centre around Devil worship and through Satan’s favourite means – Deception! (Allowed by YAHUAH for his purposes to test his church). Let’s look at a nice piece of Luke’s work… Acts 4. 30: ‘By stretching forth thine hand to heal; and that signs and wonders may be done by the name of thy holy child Jesus. (Saul and his scribe/s switched Yahushua for Jesus). The account of Peter and John was a true one until Luke later adds in his own ‘Pauline’- spin. By doing this they make it look and sound as if Peter and John were performing exactly the same kinds of thing’s as Saul’s 72 interpreters. What Yahushua granted to the True 12 Apostles were not ‘Signs and Wonders’. Just by adding these few words, yet another layer of deception was brought down upon us. We would then simply assume, “Well if the ‘12’ did them, surely Saul and Co were doing nothing different right”? Wrong. Acts 14. 1: ‘And it came to pass in Iconium that they went both together into the synagogue of the Jews, and so spake, that a great multitude both of the Jews and also of the Greeks believed. But the unbelieving Jews stirred up the Gentiles, and made their minds evil affected against the brethren. Long time therefore abode they speaking boldly in the Lord, which gave testimony unto the word of his grace, and granted signs and wonders to be done by their hands. But the multitude of the city was divided: and part held with the Jews, and part with the apostles (False ones). And when there was an assault made both of the Gentiles, and also of the Jews with their rulers, to use them despitefully, and to stone them, They were aware of it, and fled unto Lystra and Derbe, cities of Lycaonia, and unto the region that lieth round about: The ‘unbelieving’ Jews of Antioch recognized false ‘Signs and Wonders’ when they saw them, which is why they knew them to be Charlatans whom served other gods! They had after all been living most of their lives in the centre for Zeus worship! They were also well educated in the original ‘tongues of fire’ account. And the first place he runs to – Lystra, is a Roman colony (From 6BC). Funny that a Hebrew would feel more comfortable with Roman’s that his blood-brethren. Download 1.22 Mb. Share with your friends:
|