The spirit of jezebel, the mystery of iniquity and The strong delusion editor: The Ineffable, Unbegotten Creator yahuah

Acts 20. 24-26: ‘But none of these things move me, neither count I my life dear unto myself, so that I might finish my course with joy, and the ministry, which I have received of the Lord Jesus, to testify the gospel of the grace of God (Which is not ‘the Gospel of the Kingdom’) And now, behold, I know that ye all, among whom I have gone preaching the kingdom of God, shall see my face no more. Wherefore I take you to record this day that I am pure from the blood of all men!!

Most likely in reply to accusations about his real serpent-seedline heritage. He is actually stating that he is above mankind in that he is not even of the same blood as them!

For those readers who do not believe in any such thing as a ‘Serpent- Seedline’….well I would pinch myself to check I was still breathing!

In the chapter Paul the false Apostle I mentioned that many scholars believe the book of Hebrews was not written by Paul. In spite of the fact that the message of Hebrews is similar to that of Paul's message in that he believes the Law has been done away with, I agree with the scholars for a number of reasons. First, unlike every other letter written by Paul, the author of Hebrews does not identify himself. Secondly, the author's grasp of the Greek language is superior to Paul's and is very eloquent compared to Paul. Paul regularly starts a thought-line and then losses it as he runs off on a tangent. The writer of Hebrews follows a very systematic strait forward line of reasoning from which he does not swerve. And third, the style of writing is significantly different than that of Paul's.  Paul's style is to continually refer to himself with the use of personal pronouns like "I", "me", "my", and "mine".  The author of the book of Hebrews refers to himself only 7 times in the entire book. Paul's self-interest is especially evident in Romans and 1st and 2nd Corinthians where he uses personal pronouns 103,175 and 103 times respectively in these three books. The author of Hebrews coming in at only 7 times was obviously not as interested in making something of himself.

Of the possible choices for author of Hebrews there is really only one good candidate and that person is Apollos. Apollos was a leader in the early Messianic movement (Meaning Paul and his disciples!) and he is mentioned ten times in the New Testament. Twice in the book of Acts, and eight times by Paul himself (He really does love talking about himself). We are first introduced to him in Acts 18:24.

Now a certain Jew named Apollos, born at Alexandria, an eloquent man and mighty in the Scriptures, came to Ephesus. This man had been instructed in the way of the Lord; and being fervent in spirit, he spoke and taught accurately the things of the Lord...(The commentary that Apollos "taught accurately", comes from Luke's point of view).

Paul also speaks of Apollos as a prominent leader with an apparently significant following. His name is mentioned right along with the likes of himself, Peter, and Jesus. 

1Corinthians 1. 12: ‘Now I say this, that each of you says, ‘I am of Paul’, or ‘I am of Apollos’, or ‘I am of Cephas’, or ‘I am of Christ’. (Not KJV)

Note the order of the names. Apollos is the closest to Paul who names himself first. Paul undoubtedly thinks highly of Apollos because Apollos generally agrees with his doctrine. We know that Apollos was influenced by Pauline doctrine through Aquila and Priscilla who themselves spent much time with Paul and later "explained the way of God more accurately" to Apollos. Acts 18:18-28 

If indeed Apollos was the author of Hebrews it would make perfect sense why he did not identify himself as the author of the book. The book was written to the Hebrew people. Unlike the way most of us use names today, the Jewish people made much of a person's name. A name was supposed to tell you something about that person. Apollos was not named after the God of Israel or any of the patriarchs as most non-Hellenic Jews were. He was a Greek Jew, born in Alexandria Egypt and named after the pagan god Apollo the son of Zeus! A book with a name like Apollos attached to it would automatically have three strikes against it in the eyes of most Hebrew people.

The rest of the article requires attention, especially for those that love ‘Hebrews’.
The first real ‘subversion’ of Messiah’s Gospel of the Kingdom, was when Saul came along after his claimed Damascus road experience and then the followers of the true Messiah, tried to kill him for it! Saul was lucky to escape and ran back to the safety of his Roman masters to come up with a more effective plan. I concur with the Rev Derrek Younger, when he says that Saul was a ‘power-hungry’ man. I am adding to that statement by stating that he was driven by ‘the Spirit of Jezebel’, which in turn deceived Christianity into ‘Another Gospel’. Rome of course used his writing’s over the next 300 yrs, to replace the writing’s of the disciples. Now though they have resurfaced and can be found in the ‘Nag Hammadi library’, all available on the internet. I recommend downloading them or printing them before the New World Order freaks shut the net down in order to replace it with their ‘Mark of the Beast’ access only – Supra-net.

Galatians 1.6-12: ‘I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel (M.I: I’m surprised that you leave my version of the grace of christ and go back to that gospel of the kingdom): Which is not another (Yes it is another gospel. It is Messiah’s gospel); but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ (Like you Saul). But though we, or an angel from heaven (It’s up to us to test the spirits whether they be of God or not. Paul is telling us not to listen to anything but him!), preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed (If you don’t follow Saul’s gospel of grace, Saul curses them). For do I now persuade men, or God? Or do I seek to please men? For if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ (Misdirection). But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Yahushua Christ’.

For some, even this becomes a point of division. The top version is of course just Jezebel making it sound appealing to our carnal ears, encouraging our belief in the Spirit of Anti-Christ’s statement! (Tangent End)

Verses 6-7: ‘And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in diverse places. All these are the beginning of sorrows.

The Beginning of Sorrows is the time period from the end of the Crucifixion, up to the beginning of the Great Tribulation! The ‘Great Tribulation’ replaces the ‘beginning of sorrows’ and is the final testing phase for the Grooms Bride! Therefore the ‘rumours of wars’ and ‘nations rising against nations’ includes the last Struggles of the Roman Empire, before it was forced underground into subversion for its own survival. Just as Mithraism is said to have ‘faded away’ at the end of the 4^th Century, disguising itself under the banner of the Christian Dove! It just went underground is all it did. The Phoenix (Golden Eagle) would then be guaranteed to Rise-Again from the ashes of destruction. Tangent topic: Hence the Phoenix/Eagle on the American 1 Dollar notes and it’s use as a Military emblem. The US public Army has and is being perverted in order to carry out Nazi ideals! That is why they are/have developed Bio-Chemical war-agents that specifically target a racial-type! In this way the Serpent-Seedline Hybrids (Explained later on for the unknowing or un-believers in it), can target every single DNA profile except their own! It is the very purpose for which America was founded. They are being de-humanized in order to use them for the ‘War on the Saints’ and anyone who defies the New World Order. (Tangent End).

Verse 9-10: ‘Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake…

This is describing the first War on the Saints (With the Lion feeding and the games that slaughtered all those who were confessing Messiah), as well as the second War on the saints during the Great Tribulation. Because after those two verses we have this!

Verse 11: “And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another”. And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many’

Matthew 24. 24: ‘For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect’.

General umbrella site: http://www.sherryshriner.com/

Website about Saul/Paul: http://www.justgivemethetruth.com/

B: The following two excerpts from an earlier book, "The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception" also raise doubts as to the legitimacy of Paul's role within the early church:

by Michael Bajgent and Richard Leigh (Corgi Books, London, 1991)

‘... Paul is in effect the first Christian heretic, and his teachings, which become the foundation of later Christianity, are a flagrant deviation from the 'Original' or 'pure' form extolled by the leadership. Whether James, the 'Lord's brother,' was literally Yahushua' blood kin or not (and everything suggests he was), it is clear that he knew Yahushua...personally. So did most of the other members of the community or 'early Church,' in Jerusalem, including of course, Peter. When they spoke, they did so with first hand authority. Paul had never had such personal acquaintance with the figure he'd begun to regard as his 'Saviour.' He had only his quasi-mystical experience in the desert and the sound of a disembodied voice. For him to arrogate authority to himself on this basis is, to say the least, presumptuous. It also leads him to distort Yahushua' teachings beyond recognition, to formulate, in fact, his own highly individual and idiosyncratic theology, and then to legitimise it by spuriously ascribing it to Yahushua’.

"As things transpired, however, the mainstream of the new movement gradually coalesced, during the next three centuries, around Paul and his teachings. Thus, to the undoubted posthumous horror of James and his associates, an entirely new religion was indeed born, a religion that came to have less and less to do with its supposed founder."

©Copyright Knowledge of Reality Magazine 1996-2003. All rights reserved.

Paul was not at all sheepish about calling himself an apostle. In fact, in nine out of thirteen of his books, he introduces himself as an apostle of Yahushua, and in every case he states in one way or another that his apostleship stands by divine sovereign decree.

Here is the question. Should we automatically believe the testimony of a person who makes grand claims about themselves, when all we have for confirmation of their claim is little more than their word and maybe a statement or two from their best friend? If so, then we should likewise confirm those like Jim Jones and David Koresh. Unless there is obvious corroborative evidence to support such claims made today and in the past, all of them should be taken with a very large helping of salt. Unlike Paul, a true prophet or apostle does not have to go to such extraordinary lengths to convince the world they are who they say they are. Even Yeshua said that if he alone bore witness of himself, his witness was invalid. John 5:31 and of all the people who shouldn't need to have others testify on their behalf, Yeshua was that person. Yet he had Moses, the prophets, the Psalms, John the Baptist, the Fathers voice from heaven declaring to everyone "this is My beloved Son..." and hundreds of those who witnessed his resurrection just to name a few. Paul had none of these. Though in his conceit he considered himself to be God's gift to the Gentiles and tried to claim a prophecy for himself that was given exclusively to Isaiah in

Isaiah 49. 6: ‘And he said, It is a light thing that thou shouldest be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob, and to restore the preserved of Israel: I will also give thee for a light to the Gentiles, that thou mayest be my salvation unto the end of the earth.

Acts 13. 47: ‘For so the Lord has commanded us: 'I have set you to be a light to the Gentiles that you should be for salvation to the ends of the earth’. Saul the Roman, Benjamite is claiming to belong to the house of Jacob!